Literature DB >> 34429701

Initial Experience in Rectal Cancer Surgery for the Next Generation of Robotic Surgeons Trained in a Dual Console System.

Manabu Yamamoto1, Keigo Ashida2, Kazushi Hara1, Ken Sugezawa1, Chihiro Uejima1, Akimitsu Tanio1, Yuji Shishido1, Kozo Miyatani1, Takehiko Hanaki1, Kyoichi Kihara1, Tomoyuki Matsunaga1, Naruo Tokuyasu1, Teruhisa Sakamoto1, Yoshiyuki Fujiwara1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery for rectal cancer is used worldwide, with an increasing incidence of robotic surgeons. Therefore, the most appropriate educational system for next-generation robotic surgeons should be urgently established.
METHODS: We analyzed 39 patients who underwent robotic rectal surgery performed by a next-generation surgeon with limited experienced in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery. The dual console system was used in the initial 15 cases, and we assessed short-term outcomes and the learning curve on operative time using the cumulative sum method.
RESULTS: The patients were divided into two groups: 15 cases in the early phase, and 24 cases in the late phase. The operative time and surgeon console time were significantly shorter in the late phase than the early phase (P < 0.001). Postoperative complications were more frequently observed in the early phase (P = 0.049); however, the estimated blood loss and length of hospital stay were not significantly different. In the initial 15 cases that using the dual console, the average operative time changing to the expert surgeon was 82 minutes in the first 5 cases, 19 minutes on average in the next 5 cases, and no change occurred in the last 5 cases. The learning curve peaked after 14 cases, plateaued from case number 15 to 23, and decreased in a linear fashion until the final case.
CONCLUSION: Education of a next generation surgeon using a dual console system for robotic rectal cancer surgery was performed safely. ©2021 Tottori University Medical Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dual console; rectal cancer; robotic surgery

Year:  2021        PMID: 34429701      PMCID: PMC8380558          DOI: 10.33160/yam.2021.08.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Yonago Acta Med        ISSN: 0513-5710            Impact factor:   1.641


  29 in total

1.  Prior experience in laparoscopic rectal surgery can minimise the learning curve for robotic rectal resections: a cumulative sum analysis.

Authors:  Manfred Odermatt; Jamil Ahmed; Sofoklis Panteleimonitis; Jim Khan; Amjad Parvaiz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with suprapancreatic nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: a multicenter phase II trial (JCOG0703).

Authors:  Naoki Hiki; Hitoshi Katai; Junki Mizusawa; Kenichi Nakamura; Mikihito Nakamori; Takaki Yoshikawa; Kazuyuki Kojima; Haruhiko Imamoto; Motoki Ninomiya; Seigo Kitano; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  Learning curve for robotic-assisted surgery for rectal cancer: use of the cumulative sum method.

Authors:  Tomohiro Yamaguchi; Yusuke Kinugasa; Akio Shiomi; Sumito Sato; Yushi Yamakawa; Hiroyasu Kagawa; Hiroyuki Tomioka; Keita Mori
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Risk factor analysis of postoperative complications after robotic rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Jeonghyun Kang; Byung Soh Min; Yoon Ah Park; Hyuk Hur; Seung Hyuk Baik; Nam Kyu Kim; Seung Kook Sohn; Kang Young Lee
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Developing a robotic colorectal cancer surgery program: understanding institutional and individual learning curves.

Authors:  Hamza Guend; Maria Widmar; Sunil Patel; Garrett M Nash; Philip B Paty; José G Guillem; Larissa K Temple; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Martin R Weiser
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Initial experience with a dual-console robotic-assisted platform for training in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  J C Bolger; M P Broe; M A Zarog; A Looney; K McKevitt; D Walsh; S Giri; C Peirce; J C Coffey
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 7.  A meta-analysis to determine the oncological implications of conversion in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  C Clancy; D P O'Leary; J P Burke; H P Redmond; J C Coffey; M J Kerin; E Myers
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.788

8.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Martijn Hgm van der Pas; Eva Haglind; Miguel A Cuesta; Alois Fürst; Antonio M Lacy; Wim Cj Hop; Hendrik Jaap Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 9.  Surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy approaches to lobectomy.

Authors:  Bryan A Whitson; Shawn S Groth; Susan J Duval; Scott J Swanson; Michael A Maddaus
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Dual-console robotic surgery: a new teaching paradigm.

Authors:  Ashlee L Smith; Eirwen M Scott; Thomas C Krivak; Alexander B Olawaiye; Tianjiao Chu; Scott D Richard
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-04-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.