Literature DB >> 24840635

Risk factor evaluation for postoperative complications in laparoscopic colorectal surgery by a classic severity grading system.

Xiang Xia1, Gang Cen, Tao Jiang, Jun Cao, Kejian Huang, Chen Huang, Zhengjun Qiu.   

Abstract

Using the uniform complication grading system to evaluate postoperative complications after laparoscopic colorectal surgery is the purpose of the present study. Surgical complications were defined as grades I, II, III, IV, and V recommended by Dindo et al. Patients were categorized into three pairs: complication group (CG) and non-complication group (NCG), minor complication group (MiCG, grades I-II) and non-minor complication group (NMiCG), and major complication group (MaCG, grades III-V) and non-major complication group (NMaCG); of the 570 patients, 431 patients were discharged with no complications, and 174 complications occurred in 119 patients. The percent of grades I, II, III, IV, and V complications were 4.7, 20, 4.7, 0.7, and 0.4 %, respectively. Complications were significantly associated with male gender, larger tumor volume, and more estimated blood loss (EBL). The multivariate analysis revealed that male and EBL ≥150 ml were found to be independent predictors of postoperative complications. In subgroup analysis, patients with larger tumor volume were at significantly higher risk of postoperative major complications, and male gender and EBL ≥150 ml remained independent predictors of developing minor postoperative complications. Patients with postoperative complications would significantly experience longer hospital stay, later fluid intake, and delayed urinary catheter removal. Male, larger tumor volume, and more EBL were significant risk factors for laparoscopic colorectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24840635     DOI: 10.1007/s13277-014-2016-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tumour Biol        ISSN: 1010-4283


  26 in total

1.  Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme.

Authors:  P M King; J M Blazeby; P Ewings; P J Franks; R J Longman; A H Kendrick; R M Kipling; R H Kennedy
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  W I Law; K W Chu; J W Ho; C W Chan
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy).

Authors:  M Jacobs; J C Verdeja; H S Goldstein
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc       Date:  1991-09

5.  Outcome in elderly patients with severe infection is influenced by sex hormones but not gender.

Authors:  Matthias W A Angstwurm; Roland Gaertner; Jochen Schopohl
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Anastomotic leakage is predictive of diminished survival after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kenneth G Walker; Stephen W Bell; Matthew J F X Rickard; Daniel Mehanna; Owen F Dent; Pierre H Chapuis; E Leslie Bokey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Grading of complications and risk factor evaluation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Ziv Asa; Ron Greenberg; Ronen Ghinea; Roy Inbar; Nir Wasserberg; Shmuel Avital
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Advanced tumor stage is an independent risk factor of postoperative infectious complications after colorectal surgery: arguments from a case-matched series.

Authors:  Jérôme Bot; Guillaume Piessen; William B Robb; Vianney Roger; Christophe Mariette
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Intraoperative blood pressure changes as a risk factor for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  I L Post; P M Verheijen; A Pronk; I Siccama; P L Houweling
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.