Literature DB >> 28642675

Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Reoperative Abdomen or Pelvis.

Amanda Feigel1, Patricia Sylla1.   

Abstract

Laparoscopy has become widely accepted as the preferred surgical approach in the management of benign and malignant colorectal diseases. Once considered a relative contraindication in patients with prior abdominal surgery (PAS), as surgeons have continued to gain expertise in advanced laparoscopy, minimally invasive approaches have been increasingly incorporated in the reoperative abdomen and pelvis. Although earlier studies have described conversion rates, most contemporary series evaluating the impact of PAS in laparoscopic colorectal resection have reported equivalent conversion and morbidity rates between reoperative and non-reoperative cases, and series evaluating the impact of laparoscopy in reoperative cases have demonstrated improved short-term outcomes with laparoscopy. The data overall highlight the importance of case selection, careful preoperative preparation and planning, and the critical role of surgeons' expertise in advanced laparoscopic techniques. Challenges to the widespread adoption of minimally invasive techniques in reoperative colorectal cases include the longer learning curve and longer operative time. However, with the steady increase in adoption of minimally invasive techniques worldwide, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is likely to continue to be applied in the management of increasingly complex reoperative colorectal cases in an effort to improve patient outcomes. In the hands of experienced MIS surgeons and in carefully selected cases, laparoscopy is both safe and efficacious for reoperative procedures in the abdomen and pelvis, with measurable short-term benefits.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colon and rectal surgery; minimally invasive surgery; previous abdominal surgery; reoperative

Year:  2016        PMID: 28642675      PMCID: PMC5477556          DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1580637

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg        ISSN: 1530-9681


  127 in total

Review 1.  Elective open versus laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticular disease: a meta-analysis with the Sigma trial.

Authors:  Muhammed R S Siddiqui; Muhammed S Sajid; Kamran Khatri; Elizabeth Cheek; Mirza K Baig
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Hand assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopy for colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Husein Moloo; Fatima Haggar; Doug Coyle; Brian Hutton; Suleena Duhaime; Joseph Mamazza; Eric C Poulin; Robin P Boushey; Jeremy Grimshaw
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-10-06

3.  Hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticular disease: 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  T J Wilhelm; A Refeidi; P Palma; T Neufang; S Post
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-21       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  SAGES TAVAC safety and effectiveness analysis: da Vinci ® Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA).

Authors:  Shawn Tsuda; Dmitry Oleynikov; Jon Gould; Dan Azagury; Bryan Sandler; Matthew Hutter; Sharona Ross; Eric Haas; Fred Brody; Richard Satava
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark Buunen; Ruben Veldkamp; Wim C J Hop; Esther Kuhry; Johannes Jeekel; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio Lacy; Hendrik J Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Does prior abdominal surgery influence conversion rates and outcomes of laparoscopic right colectomy in patients with neoplasia?

Authors:  Anaeze C Offodile; Sang W Lee; James Yoo; Richard L Whelan; Dovid Moradi; Raymond Baxter; Tracey D Arnell; Abu Nasar; Toyooki Sonoda; Jeffrey W Milsom; Daniel L Feingold
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-07-12       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Prophylactic ureteric catheters in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Authors:  S Tsujinaka; S D Wexner; G DaSilva; D R Sands; E G Weiss; J J Nogueras; J Efron; A M Vernava
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2008-05-30       Impact factor: 3.781

View more
  2 in total

1.  Predictors and Consequences of Unplanned Conversion to Open During Robotic Colectomy: An ACS-NSQIP Database Analysis.

Authors:  Andrew N Mueller; John D Vossler; Nicholas H Yim; Gregory J Harbison; Kenric M Murayama
Journal:  Hawaii J Health Soc Welf       Date:  2021-11

2.  Minimally invasive surgery techniques in pelvic exenteration: a systematic and meta-analysis review.

Authors: 
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 4.584

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.