Literature DB >> 14706322

Neural arch load-bearing in old and degenerated spines.

P Pollintine1, A S Przybyla, P Dolan, M A Adams.   

Abstract

We validate a technique for measuring neural arch load-bearing in cadaveric spines, and use it to test the hypothesis that such load-bearing rises to high levels in old and degenerated spines. Fifty-nine cadaveric lumbar motion segments, aged 19-92 yr, were subjected to compressive creep loading to reduce intervertebral disc water content and height to in vivo levels. The distribution of compressive "stress" within the disc was then measured by pulling a miniature pressure transducer, side-mounted in a 1.3mm-diameter needle, along its mid-sagittal diameter. During these measurements, the motion segment was subjected to a compressive load of 2 kN, and positioned in 2 degrees of extension to simulate erect standing. Measurements of compressive "stress" were integrated over disc area, and this force subtracted from the applied 2 kN to give the force resisted by the neural arch. An empirical calibration factor was applied to normalise results from each disc to values obtained under conditions when all of the compressive force could be assumed to pass through the disc. Disc degeneration was graded macroscopically on a scale of 1-4. Validation tests showed that calculated values of disc loading were proportional to actual applied load (r(2)>0.96) and predicted it with errors of 2-8%. Neural arch load-bearing in non-degenerated specimens was generally less than 20%, but averaged 49% for specimens aged over 70 yr. Multiple regression showed that neural arch load bearing (%)=14.4 x disc degeneration score+0.46 x age-35. These results indicate a substantial shift in vertebral load-bearing with increasing age and degeneration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14706322     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(03)00308-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  25 in total

1.  The internal mechanical properties of cervical intervertebral discs as revealed by stress profilometry.

Authors:  Daniel M Skrzypiec; Phillip Pollintine; Andrzej Przybyla; Patricia Dolan; Michael A Adams
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Measurement of subregional vertebral bone mineral density in vitro using lateral projection dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: validation with peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Egon Perilli; Ian H Parkinson; Susan Kantor; Tim V Wrigley; Nicola L Fazzalari; John D Wark
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  An increase in height of spinous process is associated with decreased heights of intervertebral disc and vertebral body in the degenerative process of lumbar spine.

Authors:  Permsak Paholpak; Zhuo Wang; Toshihiko Sakakibara; Yuichi Kasai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Intradiscal pressure depends on recent loading and correlates with disc height and compressive stiffness.

Authors:  Pieter-Paul A Vergroesen; Albert J van der Veen; Barend J van Royen; Idsart Kingma; Theo H Smit
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Ageing and degenerative changes of the intervertebral disc and their impact on spinal flexibility.

Authors:  Fabio Galbusera; Marc van Rijsbergen; Keita Ito; Jacques M Huyghe; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty Can Restore Normal Spine Mechanics following Osteoporotic Vertebral Fracture.

Authors:  Jin Luo; Michael A Adams; Patricia Dolan
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2010-06-20

Review 7.  Intervertebral disc degeneration: evidence for two distinct phenotypes.

Authors:  Michael A Adams; Patricia Dolan
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-08-12       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  The intravertebral distribution of bone density: correspondence to intervertebral disc health and implications for vertebral strength.

Authors:  A I Hussein; T M Jackman; S R Morgan; G D Barest; E F Morgan
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Mature runt cow lumbar intradiscal pressures and motion segment biomechanics.

Authors:  Glenn Robin Buttermann; Brian P Beaubien; Louis C Saeger
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Elastic Anisotropy of Trabecular Bone in the Elderly Human Vertebra.

Authors:  Ginu U Unnikrishnan; John A Gallagher; Amira I Hussein; Glenn D Barest; Elise F Morgan
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 2.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.