Literature DB >> 15304886

The range of bone mineral density in healthy Canarian women by dual X-ray absorptiometry radiography and quantitative computer tomography.

M Sosa1, D Hernández, S Estévez, M Rodríguez, J M Limiñana, P Saavedra, P Láinez, P Diáz, P Betancor.   

Abstract

Bone mass measurements play a crucial role in the diagnosis of osteoporosis. According to a World Health Organization (WHO) Working Group, osteoporosis in women can be diagnosed if the value for bone mineral density (BMD) is 2.5 or more standard deviations below the mean value of a young reference population. This definition obviously requires the availability of normal data, which should ideally be obtained locally. The objective was establish normal values of BMD in the female Canarian population, by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in the lumbar spine and the proximal femur, and by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) in the lumbar spine, and to study the correlation between the results of both techniques and the changes with age. Seven hundred forty-four Healthy Canarian women, from 20-80 yr old were examined. Measurement of bone density was performed by an Hologic QDR 1000 densitometer (DXA) in the lumbar spine and proximal femur, and by a Toshiba scanner model 600 HQ in the lumbar spine. Both methods show that the peak bone mass is achieved in the fourth decade (30-39 yr). Bone density decreases thereafter with age in the lumbar spine (r = -0.3364 DXA and r = -0.6988 for QCT) and in the femoral neck (r = -0.3988). Bone density mean values obtained by DXA are very similar to those described in Spain and in other European female populations, using the same densitometer. The correlations between both techniques (DXA and QCT) were high and statistically significant (p < 0.001 in every case). Normal values in the normal Canarian women for DXA and QCT are provided. Our results are very similar to those previously described. These two techniques have a close correlation.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 15304886     DOI: 10.1385/jcd:1:4:385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.963


  5 in total

1.  Measurement of subregional vertebral bone mineral density in vitro using lateral projection dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: validation with peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Egon Perilli; Ian H Parkinson; Susan Kantor; Tim V Wrigley; Nicola L Fazzalari; John D Wark
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Poverty is a risk factor for osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  M C Navarro; M Sosa; P Saavedra; P Lainez; M Marrero; M Torres; C D Medina
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Comparison of Measurements of Bone Mineral Density in Young and Middle-Aged Adult Women in Relation to Dietary, Anthropometric and Reproductive Variables.

Authors:  Eloy Méndez-Gallegos; Graciela Caire-Juvera; Humberto Astiazarán-García; Rosa O Méndez-Estrada
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  Effect of obesity on fragility fractures, BMD and vitamin D levels in postmenopausal women. Influence of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  M J Gómez de Tejada-Romero; P Saavedra-Santana; F de la Rosa-Fernández; N Suárez-Ramírez; A Martín-Martínez; F Martín Del Rosario; M Sosa-Henríquez
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 4.087

5.  Prevalence of Poor Bone Quality in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery: A Comprehensive Approach.

Authors:  Ricardo Díaz-Romero Paz; Manuel Sosa Henríquez; Kevin Armas Melián; Claudia Balhen Martin
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-01-25
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.