Literature DB >> 9737351

Vertebral bone density evaluated by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative computed tomography in vitro.

E N Ebbesen1, J S Thomsen, H Beck-Nielsen, H J Nepper-Rasmussen, L Mosekilde.   

Abstract

Vertebral bone density is evaluated mainly by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) or quantitative computed tomography (QCT). Densitometry is used as an estimator of bone strength and forms the basis for choice of treatment. DXA expresses bone density in grams per square centimeter (area density) and QCT expresses bone density in milligrams per cubic centimeter (volumetric density). The aim of this study was to identify the differences between the two techniques, DXA and QCT, when applied to a group of female and male subjects over a wide age range. The data consisted of 221 lumbar vertebral bodies (L3 and L4) excised at autopsy. There were 90 females with a mean age of 65.6 (range 18-94) years and 131 males with a mean age of 62.0 (range 21-94) years. The vertebrae were scanned en bloc in demineralized water in Plexiglas containers with both DXA and QCT. DXA was performed using posteroanterior (PA) and lateral projection. QCT was performed in the center of each vertebra with 1 cm slice thickness. Both methods showed decreasing bone density with age. Lateral DXA showed a decrease in bone density with age from approximately 0.8 g/cm2 to approximately 0.4 g/cm2. QCT showed a decrease in bone density with age from approximately 180 mg/cm3 to approximately 30 mg/cm3. Lateral DXA bone mineral densities (BMD) were correlated with QCT densities in both females (r2 = 0.68, p < 0.00001) and males (r2 = 0.53, p < 0.00001), but females had constantly lower DXA BMDs than males at a given QCT density. QCT and width-adjusted midlateral DXA (g/cm3) were significantly correlated, with r2 = 0.64 (p < 0.00001) for females and r2 = 0.61 (p < 0.00001) for males. In conclusion, age- and gender-related differences in human vertebral bone density were shown to be dependent on the scanning method used. DXA bone mineral content (BMC) and BMD showed that females had lower values than males at all ages. When the "volumetric" DXA measurements and QCT were used, the females had the highest densities in the younger decades and males had the highest densities in the oldest decades. Finally, the area density (BMD) measured by DXA was lower in females than in males with identical QCT volumetric bone densities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9737351     DOI: 10.1016/s8756-3282(98)00091-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of quantitative computed tomography-based measures in predicting vertebral compressive strength.

Authors:  Jenni M Buckley; Kenneth Loo; Julie Motherway
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Measurement of subregional vertebral bone mineral density in vitro using lateral projection dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: validation with peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Egon Perilli; Ian H Parkinson; Susan Kantor; Tim V Wrigley; Nicola L Fazzalari; John D Wark
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Assessment of vertebral wedge strength using cancellous textural properties derived from digital tomosynthesis and density properties from dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and high resolution computed tomography.

Authors:  Yener N Yeni; Woong Kim; Daniel Oravec; Mary Nixon; George W Divine; Michael J Flynn
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 4.  Background for studies on the treatment of male osteoporosis: state of the art.

Authors:  J M Kaufman; O Johnell; E Abadie; S Adami; M Audran; B Avouac; W B Sedrine; G Calvo; J P Devogelaer; V Fuchs; G Kreutz; P Nilsson; H Pols; J Ringe; L Van Haelst; J Y Reginster
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 19.103

5.  Analysis of bone mineral density distribution at trabecular bones in thoracic and lumbar vertebrae using X-ray CT images.

Authors:  Tatsuro Hayashi; Huayue Chen; Kei Miyamoto; Xiangrong Zhou; Takeshi Hara; Ryujiro Yokoyama; Masayuki Kanematsu; Hiroaki Hoshi; Hiroshi Fujita
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Regional variations of vertebral trabecular bone microstructure with age and gender.

Authors:  H Chen; S Shoumura; S Emura; Y Bunai
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-03-11       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Stochastic predictors from the DXA scans of human lumbar vertebrae are correlated with the microarchitecture parameters of trabecular bone.

Authors:  Xuanliang Neil Dong; Rajeshwar Pinninti; Amy Tvinnereim; Timothy Lowe; David Di Paolo; Mukul Shirvaikar
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Age-related changes in vertebral and iliac crest 3D bone microstructure--differences and similarities.

Authors:  J S Thomsen; M V Jensen; A S Niklassen; E N Ebbesen; A Brüel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Population-Stratified Analysis of Bone Mineral Density Distribution in Cervical and Lumbar Vertebrae of Chinese from Quantitative Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Yong Zhang; Zhuang Zhou; Cheng'ai Wu; Danhui Zhao; Chao Wang; Xiaoguang Cheng; Wei Cai; Ling Wang; Yangyang Duanmu; Chenxin Zhang; Wei Tian
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Contribution of the vertebral posterior elements in anterior-posterior DXA spine scans in young subjects.

Authors:  David C Lee; Patricia P Campbell; Vicente Gilsanz; Tishya Al Wren
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 6.741

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.