UNLABELLED: This study's goal was to determine associations among the intravertebral heterogeneity in bone density, bone strength, and intervertebral disc (IVD) health. Results indicated that predictions of vertebral strength can benefit from considering the magnitude of the density heterogeneity and the congruence between the spatial distribution of density and IVD health. INTRODUCTION: This study aims to determine associations among the intravertebral heterogeneity in bone density, bone strength, and IVD health METHODS: Regional measurements of bone density were performed throughout 30 L1 vertebral bodies using micro-computed tomography (μCT) and quantitative computed tomography (QCT). The magnitude of the intravertebral heterogeneity in density was defined as the interquartile range and quartile coefficient of variation in regional densities. The spatial distribution of density was quantified using ratios of regional densities representing different anatomical zones (e.g., anterior to posterior regional densities). Cluster analysis was used to identify groups of vertebrae with similar spatial distributions of density. Vertebral strength was measured in compression. IVD health was assessed using two scoring systems. RESULTS: QCT- and μCT-based measures of the magnitude of the intravertebral heterogeneity in density were strongly correlated with each other (p < 0.005). Accounting for the interquartile range in regional densities improved predictions of vertebral strength as compared to predictions based only on mean density (R (2) = 0.59 vs. 0.43; F-test p-value = 0.018). Specifically, after adjustment for mean density, vertebral bodies with greater heterogeneity in density exhibited higher strength. No single spatial distribution of density was associated with high vertebral strength. Analyses of IVD scores suggested that the health of the adjacent IVDs may modulate the effect of a particular spatial distribution of density on vertebral strength. CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive measurements of the intravertebral distribution of bone density, in conjunction with assessments of IVD health, can aid in predictions of bone strength and in elucidating biomechanical mechanisms of vertebral fracture.
UNLABELLED: This study's goal was to determine associations among the intravertebral heterogeneity in bone density, bone strength, and intervertebral disc (IVD) health. Results indicated that predictions of vertebral strength can benefit from considering the magnitude of the density heterogeneity and the congruence between the spatial distribution of density and IVD health. INTRODUCTION: This study aims to determine associations among the intravertebral heterogeneity in bone density, bone strength, and IVD health METHODS: Regional measurements of bone density were performed throughout 30 L1 vertebral bodies using micro-computed tomography (μCT) and quantitative computed tomography (QCT). The magnitude of the intravertebral heterogeneity in density was defined as the interquartile range and quartile coefficient of variation in regional densities. The spatial distribution of density was quantified using ratios of regional densities representing different anatomical zones (e.g., anterior to posterior regional densities). Cluster analysis was used to identify groups of vertebrae with similar spatial distributions of density. Vertebral strength was measured in compression. IVD health was assessed using two scoring systems. RESULTS: QCT- and μCT-based measures of the magnitude of the intravertebral heterogeneity in density were strongly correlated with each other (p < 0.005). Accounting for the interquartile range in regional densities improved predictions of vertebral strength as compared to predictions based only on mean density (R (2) = 0.59 vs. 0.43; F-test p-value = 0.018). Specifically, after adjustment for mean density, vertebral bodies with greater heterogeneity in density exhibited higher strength. No single spatial distribution of density was associated with high vertebral strength. Analyses of IVD scores suggested that the health of the adjacent IVDs may modulate the effect of a particular spatial distribution of density on vertebral strength. CONCLUSIONS: Noninvasive measurements of the intravertebral distribution of bone density, in conjunction with assessments of IVD health, can aid in predictions of bone strength and in elucidating biomechanical mechanisms of vertebral fracture.
Authors: Andrew M Briggs; Egon Perilli; Ian H Parkinson; Susan Kantor; Tim V Wrigley; Nicola L Fazzalari; John D Wark Journal: J Bone Miner Metab Date: 2011-09-13 Impact factor: 2.626
Authors: X G Cheng; P H Nicholson; S Boonen; G Lowet; P Brys; J Aerssens; G Van der Perre; J Dequeker Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 1997-10 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: T W O'Neill; W Cockerill; C Matthis; H H Raspe; M Lunt; C Cooper; D Banzer; J B Cannata; M Naves; B Felsch; D Felsenberg; J Janott; O Johnell; J A Kanis; G Kragl; A Lopes Vaz; G Lyritis; P Masaryk; G Poor; D M Reid; W Reisinger; C Scheidt-Nave; J J Stepan; C J Todd; A D Woolf; J Reeve; A J Silman Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2004-05-12 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Victor Y L Leung; Wilson C W Chan; Siu-Chun Hung; Kenneth M C Cheung; Danny Chan Journal: J Histochem Cytochem Date: 2008-11-11 Impact factor: 2.479
Authors: MeiLissa McKay; Timothy M Jackman; Amira I Hussein; Ali Guermazi; Jingjiang Liu; Elise F Morgan Journal: Bone Date: 2019-11-06 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Paul M Fein; Alexander DelMonaco; Timothy M Jackman; Cameron Curtiss; Ali Guermazi; Glenn D Barest; Elise F Morgan Journal: J Biomech Date: 2017-09-04 Impact factor: 2.712
Authors: Jarred Kaiser; Brett Allaire; Paul M Fein; Darlene Lu; Mohamed Jarraya; Ali Guermazi; Serkalem Demissie; Elizabeth J Samelson; Mary L Bouxsein; Elise F Morgan Journal: Arch Osteoporos Date: 2018-11-12 Impact factor: 2.617
Authors: Timothy M Jackman; Amira I Hussein; Cameron Curtiss; Paul M Fein; Anderson Camp; Lidia De Barros; Elise F Morgan Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2015-12-24 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Jarred Kaiser; Brett Allaire; Paul M Fein; Darlene Lu; Alexander Adams; Douglas P Kiel; Mohamed Jarraya; Ali Guermazi; Serkalem Demissie; Elizabeth J Samelson; Mary L Bouxsein; Elise F Morgan Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2020-01-16 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Timothy M Jackman; Amira I Hussein; Alexander M Adams; Kamil K Makhnejia; Elise F Morgan Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2014-04-02 Impact factor: 3.494