Literature DB >> 20347368

Novel assessment of subregional bone mineral density using DXA and pQCT and subregional microarchitecture using micro-CT in whole human vertebrae: applications, methods, and correspondence between technologies.

Andrew M Briggs1, Egon Perilli, Ian H Parkinson, Tim V Wrigley, Nicola L Fazzalari, Susan Kantor, John D Wark.   

Abstract

In the clinical environment dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the current tool of first choice for assessing and monitoring skeletal integrity. A major drawback of standard DXA is that the bone mineral density (BMD) data cannot be used with certainty to predict who will sustain a vertebral fracture. However, measurement of BMD within vertebral subregions, instead of relying on a gross estimate of vertebral BMD, may improve diagnostic sensitivity. The aim of this article was to describe a validation study for subregional BMD measurement using lateral-projection DXA and to present preliminary data. Concurrent validity of measuring subregional BMD with DXA was established against measures of volumetric subregional BMD from peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) and subregional bone volume fraction from microCT at the L2 vertebral body in 8 cadaver spine specimens. The novel approaches for measuring subregional parameters with each imaging modality are described. Significant differences in bone parameters between vertebral subregions were observed for each imaging modality (p<0.05). Correspondence ranged from R(2)=0.01-0.79 and R(2)=0.06-0.80 between "DXA vs. pQCT" and "DXA vs. micro-CT," respectively. For both imaging modalities, correspondence with DXA was high for centrally and anteriorly positioned subregions. These data provide a basis for larger studies to examine the biological significance of heterogeneity in vertebral BMD. The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20347368     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2010.01.120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  8 in total

1.  Locally measured microstructural parameters are better associated with vertebral strength than whole bone density.

Authors:  J Hazrati Marangalou; F Eckstein; V Kuhn; K Ito; M Cataldi; F Taddei; B van Rietbergen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Measurement of subregional vertebral bone mineral density in vitro using lateral projection dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: validation with peripheral quantitative computed tomography.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Egon Perilli; Ian H Parkinson; Susan Kantor; Tim V Wrigley; Nicola L Fazzalari; John D Wark
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Modic (endplate) changes in the lumbar spine: bone micro-architecture and remodelling.

Authors:  Egon Perilli; Ian H Parkinson; Le-Hoa Truong; Kuan C Chong; Nicola L Fazzalari; Orso L Osti
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Vertebral bone mineral measures and psychological wellbeing among individuals with modic changes.

Authors:  Andrew M Briggs; Peter B O'Sullivan; Deryck Foulner; John D Wark
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Case Rep       Date:  2012-03-27

5.  Bone mineral density and bone remodeling markers in chronic low back pain patients with active discopathy: A case-control exploratory study.

Authors:  Stéphanie Teboul-Coré; Christian Roux; Didier Borderie; Sami Kolta; Marie-Martine Lefèvre-Colau; Serge Poiraudeau; François Rannou; Christelle Nguyen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Glucocorticoid-induced bone loss is associated with abnormal intravertebral areal bone mineral density distribution.

Authors:  Louise I Manning; Andrew M Briggs; Sharon Van Doornum; Ashwini Kale; Susan Kantor; John D Wark
Journal:  Int J Endocrinol       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 3.257

7.  Governing Equations of Tissue Modelling and Remodelling: A Unified Generalised Description of Surface and Bulk Balance.

Authors:  Pascal R Buenzli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The Segond fracture occurs at the site of lowest sub-entheseal trabecular bone volume fraction on the tibial plateau.

Authors:  William Mullins; Gavin E Jarvis; Daniel Oluboyede; Linda Skingle; Ken Poole; Tom Turmezei; Cecilia Brassett
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 2.610

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.