Literature DB >> 21903442

Load/strain distribution between ulna and radius in the mouse forearm compression loading model.

Yunkai Lu1, Ganesh Thiagarajan, Daniel P Nicolella, Mark L Johnson.   

Abstract

Finite element analysis (FEA) of the mouse forearm compression loading model is used to relate strain distributions with downstream changes in bone formation and responses of bone cells. The objective of this study was to develop two FEA models - the first one with the traditional ulna only and the second one in which both the ulna and radius are included, in order to examine the effect of the inclusion of the radius on the strain distributions in the ulna. The entire mouse forearm was scanned using microCT and images were converted into FEA tetrahedral meshes using a suite of software programs. The performance of both linear and quadratic tetrahedral elements and coarse and fine meshes were studied. A load of 2N was applied to the ulna/radius model and a 1.3N load (based on previous investigations of load sharing between the ulna and radius in rats) was applied to the ulna only model for subsequent simulations. The results showed differences in the cross sectional strain distributions and magnitude within the ulna for the combined ulna/radius model versus the ulna only model. The maximal strain in the combined model occurred about 4mm toward the distal end from the ulna mid-shaft in both models. Results from the FEA model simulations were also compared to experimentally determined strain values. We conclude that inclusion of the radius in FE models to predict strains during in vivo forearm loading increases the magnitude of the estimated ulna strains compared to those predicted from a model of the ulna alone but the distribution was similar. This has important ramifications for future studies to understand strain thresholds needed to activate bone cell responses to mechanical loading. Copyright Â
© 2011 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21903442      PMCID: PMC3251705          DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2011.07.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  38 in total

1.  Mechanotransduction in bone: genetic effects on mechanosensitivity in mice.

Authors:  A G Robling; C H Turner
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Regulation of bone formation by applied dynamic loads.

Authors:  C T Rubin; L E Lanyon
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Mechanical properties in long bones of rat osteopetrotic mutations.

Authors:  Timo Jämsä; Jae-Young Rho; Zaifeng Fan; Carole A MacKay; Sandy C Marks; Juha Tuukkanen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Modulation of appositional and longitudinal bone growth in the rat ulna by applied static and dynamic force.

Authors:  A G Robling; K M Duijvelaar; J V Geevers; N Ohashi; C H Turner
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Noninvasive loading of the murine tibia: an in vivo model for the study of mechanotransduction.

Authors:  Ted S Gross; Sundar Srinivasan; Chung C Liu; Thomas L Clemens; Steven D Bain
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  In vivo fatigue loading of the rat ulna induces both bone formation and resorption and leads to time-related changes in bone mechanical properties and density.

Authors:  Yeou-Fang Hsieh; Matthew J Silva
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Nanoindentation and whole-bone bending estimates of material properties in bones from the senescence accelerated mouse SAMP6.

Authors:  Matthew J Silva; Michael D Brodt; Zaifeng Fan; Jae-Young Rho
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Noninvasive fatigue fracture model of the rat ulna.

Authors:  A E Tami; P Nasser; M B Schaffler; M L Knothe Tate
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  A finite element model of the human knee joint for the study of tibio-femoral contact.

Authors:  Tammy L Haut Donahue; M L Hull; Mark M Rashid; Christopher R Jacobs
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.097

10.  Experimental and finite element analysis of the rat ulnar loading model-correlations between strain and bone formation following fatigue loading.

Authors:  S P Kotha; Y-F Hsieh; R M Strigel; R Müller; M J Silva
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  9 in total

1.  In vivo mechanical loading rapidly activates β-catenin signaling in osteocytes through a prostaglandin mediated mechanism.

Authors:  N Lara-Castillo; N A Kim-Weroha; M A Kamel; B Javaheri; D L Ellies; R E Krumlauf; G Thiagarajan; M L Johnson
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Determination of Elastic Modulus in Mouse Bones Using a Nondestructive Micro-Indentation Technique Using Reference Point Indentation.

Authors:  Ganesh Thiagarajan; Mark T Begonia; Mark Dallas; Nuria Lara-Castillo; JoAnna M Scott; Mark L Johnson
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Non-contact strain measurement in the mouse forearm loading model using digital image correlation (DIC).

Authors:  Mark T Begonia; Mark Dallas; Bruno Vizcarra; Ying Liu; Mark L Johnson; Ganesh Thiagarajan
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Magnitude of loads influences the site of failure of highly curved bones.

Authors:  James Macione; Robert Sterling Nesbitt; Shiva Kotha
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2013-12-02

Review 5.  Multiscale finite element modeling of mechanical strains and fluid flow in osteocyte lacunocanalicular system.

Authors:  Thiagarajan Ganesh; Loretta E Laughrey; Mohammadmehdi Niroobakhsh; Nuria Lara-Castillo
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Experimental and finite element analysis of dynamic loading of the mouse forearm.

Authors:  Ganesh Thiagarajan; Yunkai Lu; Mark Dallas; Mark L Johnson
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Osteocyte lacunar strain determination using multiscale finite element analysis.

Authors:  Sravan K Kola; Mark T Begonia; LeAnn M Tiede-Lewis; Loretta E Laughrey; Sarah L Dallas; Mark L Johnson; Thiagarajan Ganesh
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2020-05-19

8.  Kindlin-2 mediates mechanotransduction in bone by regulating expression of Sclerostin in osteocytes.

Authors:  Lei Qin; Xuekun Fu; Jing Ma; Manxia Lin; Peijun Zhang; Yishu Wang; Qinnan Yan; Chu Tao; Wen Liu; Bin Tang; Di Chen; Xiaochun Bai; Huiling Cao; Guozhi Xiao
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-03-25

9.  Effects of Stellate Ganglion Block on Healing of Fractures Induced in Rats.

Authors:  Hasan Kizilay; Husamettin Cakici; Erkan Kilinc; Tulin Firat; Tolgahan Kuru; A Alper Sahin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-08-16       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.