Literature DB >> 25196694

Experimental and finite element analysis of dynamic loading of the mouse forearm.

Ganesh Thiagarajan1, Yunkai Lu, Mark Dallas, Mark L Johnson.   

Abstract

Bone formation is reported to initiate in osteocytes by mechanotransduction due to dynamic loading of bone. The first step towards this is to characterize the dynamic strain fields in the overall bone. Here, the previously developed mouse forearm ulna-radius model, subjected to static loading, has been further enhanced by incorporating a loading cap and applying a cyclic dynamic load to more closely approximate experimental biological conditions. This study also incorporates data obtained from strain gauging both the ulna and radius simultaneously. Based on separate experiments, the elastic modulus of the ulna and radius were determined to be 13.8 and 9.9 GPa, respectively. Another novel aspect of the numerical model is the inclusion of the interosseous membrane in the FE model with membrane stiffness ranging from 5-15 N/mm that have been found to give strain values closer to that from the experiments. Interestingly, the inclusion of the interosseous membrane helped to equalize the peak strain magnitudes in the ulna and radius (∼1800 at 2 N load and ∼3200 at 3.5 N), which was also observed experimentally. This model represents a significant advance towards being able to simulate through FE analysis the strain fields generated in vivo upon mechanical loading of the mouse forearm.
© 2014 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dynamic load; experiments; finite element analysis; interosseous membrane; mouse forearm

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25196694      PMCID: PMC4356248          DOI: 10.1002/jor.22720

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  37 in total

1.  Effects of loading frequency on mechanically induced bone formation.

Authors:  Y F Hsieh; C H Turner
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Low-magnitude mechanical loading becomes osteogenic when rest is inserted between each load cycle.

Authors:  Sundar Srinivasan; David A Weimer; Steven C Agans; Steven D Bain; Ted S Gross
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 3.  Osteocytes, mechanosensing and Wnt signaling.

Authors:  Lynda F Bonewald; Mark L Johnson
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Noninvasive loading of the murine tibia: an in vivo model for the study of mechanotransduction.

Authors:  Ted S Gross; Sundar Srinivasan; Chung C Liu; Thomas L Clemens; Steven D Bain
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Validation of a technique for studying functional adaptation of the mouse ulna in response to mechanical loading.

Authors:  K C L Lee; A Maxwell; L E Lanyon
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Improved bone structure and strength after long-term mechanical loading is greatest if loading is separated into short bouts.

Authors:  Alexander G Robling; Felicia M Hinant; David B Burr; Charles H Turner
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Noninvasive fatigue fracture model of the rat ulna.

Authors:  A E Tami; P Nasser; M B Schaffler; M L Knothe Tate
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  A finite element model of the human knee joint for the study of tibio-femoral contact.

Authors:  Tammy L Haut Donahue; M L Hull; Mark M Rashid; Christopher R Jacobs
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  Evidence for a skeletal mechanosensitivity gene on mouse chromosome 4.

Authors:  Alexander G Robling; Jiliang Li; Kathryn L Shultz; Wesley G Beamer; Charles H Turner
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2002-12-18       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Experimental and finite element analysis of the rat ulnar loading model-correlations between strain and bone formation following fatigue loading.

Authors:  S P Kotha; Y-F Hsieh; R M Strigel; R Müller; M J Silva
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  6 in total

1.  Experimental studies of bone mechanoadaptation: bridging in vitro and in vivo studies with multiscale systems.

Authors:  Genevieve N Brown; Rachel L Sattler; X Edward Guo
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  In vivo mechanical loading rapidly activates β-catenin signaling in osteocytes through a prostaglandin mediated mechanism.

Authors:  N Lara-Castillo; N A Kim-Weroha; M A Kamel; B Javaheri; D L Ellies; R E Krumlauf; G Thiagarajan; M L Johnson
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Prolonged high force high repetition pulling induces osteocyte apoptosis and trabecular bone loss in distal radius, while low force high repetition pulling induces bone anabolism.

Authors:  Mary F Barbe; Vicky S Massicotte; Soroush Assari; M Alexandra Monroy; Nagat Frara; Michele Y Harris; Mamta Amin; Tamara King; Geneva E Cruz; Steve N Popoff
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 4.  Patient-Specific Bone Multiscale Modelling, Fracture Simulation and Risk Analysis-A Survey.

Authors:  Amadeus C S de Alcântara; Israel Assis; Daniel Prada; Konrad Mehle; Stefan Schwan; Lucia Costa-Paiva; Munir S Skaf; Luiz C Wrobel; Paulo Sollero
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-24       Impact factor: 3.623

5.  Non-contact strain measurement in the mouse forearm loading model using digital image correlation (DIC).

Authors:  Mark T Begonia; Mark Dallas; Bruno Vizcarra; Ying Liu; Mark L Johnson; Ganesh Thiagarajan
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 6.  Multiscale finite element modeling of mechanical strains and fluid flow in osteocyte lacunocanalicular system.

Authors:  Thiagarajan Ganesh; Loretta E Laughrey; Mohammadmehdi Niroobakhsh; Nuria Lara-Castillo
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 4.398

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.