Literature DB >> 29801077

Determination of Elastic Modulus in Mouse Bones Using a Nondestructive Micro-Indentation Technique Using Reference Point Indentation.

Ganesh Thiagarajan1, Mark T Begonia2, Mark Dallas3, Nuria Lara-Castillo3, JoAnna M Scott3, Mark L Johnson3.   

Abstract

The determination of the elastic modulus of bone is important in studying the response of bone to loading and is determined using a destructive three-point bending method. Reference point indentation (RPI), with one cycle of indentation, offers a nondestructive alternative to determine the elastic modulus. While the elastic modulus could be determined using a nondestructive procedure for ex vivo experiments, for in vivo testing, the three-point bending technique may not be practical and hence RPI is viewed as a potential alternative and explored in this study. Using the RPI measurements, total indentation distance (TID), creep indentation distance, indentation force, and the unloading slope, we have developed a numerical analysis procedure using the Oliver-Pharr (O/P) method to estimate the indentation elastic modulus. Two methods were used to determine the area function: (1) Oliver-Pharr (O/P-based on a numerical procedure) and (2) geometric (based on the calculation of the projected area of indentation). The indentation moduli of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) calculated by the O/P (3.49-3.68 GPa) and geometric (3.33-3.49 GPa) methods were similar to values in literature (3.5-4 GPa). In a study using femurs from C57Bl/6 mice of different ages and genders, the three-point bending modulus was lower than the indentation modulus. In femurs from 4 to 5 months old TOPGAL mice, we found that the indentation modulus from the geometric (5.61 ± 1.25 GPa) and O/P (5.53 ± 1.27 GPa) methods was higher than the three-point bending modulus (5.28 ± 0.34 GPa). In females, the indentation modulus from the geometric (7.45 ± 0.86 GPa) and O/P (7.46 ± 0.92 GPa) methods was also higher than the three-point bending modulus (7.33 ± 1.13 GPa). We can conclude from this study that the RPI determined values are relatively close to three-point bending values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29801077      PMCID: PMC6056200          DOI: 10.1115/1.4039982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  29 in total

1.  In vivo mechanical loading rapidly activates β-catenin signaling in osteocytes through a prostaglandin mediated mechanism.

Authors:  N Lara-Castillo; N A Kim-Weroha; M A Kamel; B Javaheri; D L Ellies; R E Krumlauf; G Thiagarajan; M L Johnson
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Reference-point indentation correlates with bone toughness assessed using whole-bone traditional mechanical testing.

Authors:  Maxime A Gallant; Drew M Brown; Jason M Organ; Matthew R Allen; David B Burr
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Comparison of cyclic and impact-based reference point indentation measurements in human cadaveric tibia.

Authors:  Lamya Karim; Miranda Van Vliet; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Toughness and damage susceptibility in human cortical bone is proportional to mechanical inhomogeneity at the osteonal-level.

Authors:  Orestis L Katsamenis; Thomas Jenkins; Philipp J Thurner
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Bone biomechanical properties in prostaglandin EP1 and EP2 knockout mice.

Authors:  M P Akhter; D M Cullen; G Gong; R R Recker
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  Load/strain distribution between ulna and radius in the mouse forearm compression loading model.

Authors:  Yunkai Lu; Ganesh Thiagarajan; Daniel P Nicolella; Mark L Johnson
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 2.242

7.  Non-contact strain measurement in the mouse forearm loading model using digital image correlation (DIC).

Authors:  Mark T Begonia; Mark Dallas; Bruno Vizcarra; Ying Liu; Mark L Johnson; Ganesh Thiagarajan
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Comparison of three-point bending test and peripheral quantitative computed tomography analysis in the evaluation of the strength of mouse femur and tibia.

Authors:  T Jämsä; P Jalovaara; Z Peng; H K Väänänen; J Tuukkanen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Reference point indentation is insufficient for detecting alterations in traditional mechanical properties of bone under common experimental conditions.

Authors:  John B Krege; Mohammad W Aref; Erin McNerny; Joseph M Wallace; Jason M Organ; Matthew R Allen
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-04-09       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  The inferomedial femoral neck is compromised by age but not disease: Fracture toughness and the multifactorial mechanisms comprising reference point microindentation.

Authors:  T Jenkins; O L Katsamenis; O G Andriotis; L V Coutts; B Carter; D G Dunlop; R O C Oreffo; C Cooper; N C Harvey; P J Thurner
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2017-06-30
View more
  1 in total

1.  The Cortical Bone Metabolome of C57BL/6J Mice Is Sexually Dimorphic.

Authors:  Hope D Welhaven; Ghazal Vahidi; Seth T Walk; Brian Bothner; Stephen A Martin; Chelsea M Heveran; Ronald K June
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2022-06-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.