Literature DB >> 26388521

Non-contact strain measurement in the mouse forearm loading model using digital image correlation (DIC).

Mark T Begonia1, Mark Dallas2, Bruno Vizcarra1, Ying Liu2, Mark L Johnson2, Ganesh Thiagarajan3.   

Abstract

This study investigates the use of a non-contact method known as digital image correlation (DIC) to measure strains in the mouse forearm during axial compressive loading. A two camera system was adapted to analyze the medial and lateral forearm displacements simultaneously, and the derived DIC strain measurements were compared to strain gage readings from both the ulna and radius. Factors such as region-of-interest (ROI) location, lens magnification, noise, and out-of-plane motion were examined to determine their influence on the DIC strain measurements. We confirmed that our DIC system can differentiate ROI locations since it detected higher average strains in the ulna compared to the radius and detected compressive strains on medial bone surfaces vs. tensile strains on lateral bone surfaces. Interestingly, the DIC method also captured heterogeneity in surface strain fields which are not detectable by strain gage based methods. A separate analysis of the noise intrinsic to the DIC system also revealed that the noise constituted less than 4.5% of all DIC strain measurements. Furthermore, finite element (FE) simulations of the forearm showed that out-of-plane motion was not a significant factor that influenced DIC measurements. Finally, we observed that average DIC strain measurements can be up to 1.5-2 times greater than average strain gage readings on the medial bone surfaces. These findings suggest that strain experienced in the mouse forearm model by loading is better captured through DIC as opposed to strain gages, which as a result of being glued to the bone surface artificially stiffen the bone and lead to an underestimation of the strain response.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Digital image correlation; Forearm; Radius; Strain; Ulna

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26388521      PMCID: PMC4640949          DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  22 in total

1.  FEBio: finite elements for biomechanics.

Authors:  Steve A Maas; Benjamin J Ellis; Gerard A Ateshian; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.097

2.  In vivo mechanical loading rapidly activates β-catenin signaling in osteocytes through a prostaglandin mediated mechanism.

Authors:  N Lara-Castillo; N A Kim-Weroha; M A Kamel; B Javaheri; D L Ellies; R E Krumlauf; G Thiagarajan; M L Johnson
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Effect of microstructure on the mechanical properties of Haversian cortical bone.

Authors:  T Hoc; L Henry; M Verdier; D Aubry; L Sedel; A Meunier
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2005-12-05       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  The Wnt co-receptor LRP5 is essential for skeletal mechanotransduction but not for the anabolic bone response to parathyroid hormone treatment.

Authors:  Kimihiko Sawakami; Alexander G Robling; Minrong Ai; Nathaniel D Pitner; Dawei Liu; Stuart J Warden; Jiliang Li; Peter Maye; David W Rowe; Randall L Duncan; Matthew L Warman; Charles H Turner
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Load/strain distribution between ulna and radius in the mouse forearm compression loading model.

Authors:  Yunkai Lu; Ganesh Thiagarajan; Daniel P Nicolella; Mark L Johnson
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 2.242

6.  Wnt/beta-catenin signaling is a normal physiological response to mechanical loading in bone.

Authors:  John A Robinson; Moitreyee Chatterjee-Kishore; Paul J Yaworsky; Diane M Cullen; Weiguang Zhao; Christine Li; Yogendra Kharode; Linda Sauter; Philip Babij; Eugene L Brown; Andrew A Hill; Mohammed P Akhter; Mark L Johnson; Robert R Recker; Barry S Komm; Frederick J Bex
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Using digital image correlation to determine bone surface strains during loading and after adaptation of the mouse tibia.

Authors:  Pavel Sztefek; Maximilien Vanleene; Robin Olsson; Rebecca Collinson; Andrew A Pitsillides; Sandra Shefelbine
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Adaptive and Injury Response of Bone to Mechanical Loading.

Authors:  Sarah H McBride; Matthew J Silva
Journal:  Bonekey Osteovision       Date:  2012-10-10

9.  Mechanical stimulation of bone in vivo reduces osteocyte expression of Sost/sclerostin.

Authors:  Alexander G Robling; Paul J Niziolek; Lee A Baldridge; Keith W Condon; Matthew R Allen; Imranul Alam; Sara M Mantila; Jelica Gluhak-Heinrich; Teresita M Bellido; Stephen E Harris; Charles H Turner
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-12-17       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Ex vivo determination of bone tissue strains for an in vivo mouse tibial loading model.

Authors:  Alessandra Carriero; Lisa Abela; Andrew A Pitsillides; Sandra J Shefelbine
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  6 in total

1.  Determination of Elastic Modulus in Mouse Bones Using a Nondestructive Micro-Indentation Technique Using Reference Point Indentation.

Authors:  Ganesh Thiagarajan; Mark T Begonia; Mark Dallas; Nuria Lara-Castillo; JoAnna M Scott; Mark L Johnson
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 2.  Mechanical Stimuli in the Local In Vivo Environment in Bone: Computational Approaches Linking Organ-Scale Loads to Cellular Signals.

Authors:  Graeme R Paul; Angad Malhotra; Ralph Müller
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Biomechanical coupling facilitates spinal neural tube closure in mouse embryos.

Authors:  Gabriel L Galea; Young-June Cho; Gauden Galea; Matteo A Molè; Ana Rolo; Dawn Savery; Dale Moulding; Lucy H Culshaw; Evanthia Nikolopoulou; Nicholas D E Greene; Andrew J Copp
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Estimation of load conditions and strain distribution for in vivo murine tibia compression loading using experimentally informed finite element models.

Authors:  Edmund Pickering; Matthew J Silva; Peter Delisser; Michael D Brodt; YuanTong Gu; Peter Pivonka
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2020-12-13       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Experimentally Achievable Accuracy Using a Digital Image Correlation Technique in measuring Small-Magnitude (<0.1%) Homogeneous Strain Fields.

Authors:  Alice Acciaioli; Giacomo Lionello; Massimiliano Baleani
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-05-08       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Age and gender related differences in load-strain response in C57Bl/6 mice.

Authors:  Hammad Mumtaz; Nuria Lara-Castillo; JoAnna M Scott; Mark Begonia; Mark Dallas; Mark L Johnson; Thiagarajan Ganesh
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 5.682

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.