Literature DB >> 26828740

Bilateral cochlear implants in children: Effects of auditory experience and deprivation on auditory perception.

Ruth Y Litovsky1, Karen Gordon2.   

Abstract

Spatial hearing skills are essential for children as they grow, learn and play. These skills provide critical cues for determining the locations of sources in the environment, and enable segregation of important sounds, such as speech, from background maskers or interferers. Spatial hearing depends on availability of monaural cues and binaural cues. The latter result from integration of inputs arriving at the two ears from sounds that vary in location. The binaural system has exquisite mechanisms for capturing differences between the ears in both time of arrival and intensity. The major cues that are thus referred to as being vital for binaural hearing are: interaural differences in time (ITDs) and interaural differences in levels (ILDs). In children with normal hearing (NH), spatial hearing abilities are fairly well developed by age 4-5 years. In contrast, most children who are deaf and hear through cochlear implants (CIs) do not have an opportunity to experience normal, binaural acoustic hearing early in life. These children may function by having to utilize auditory cues that are degraded with regard to numerous stimulus features. In recent years there has been a notable increase in the number of children receiving bilateral CIs, and evidence suggests that while having two CIs helps them function better than when listening through a single CI, these children generally perform worse than their NH peers. This paper reviews some of the recent work on bilaterally implanted children. The focus is on measures of spatial hearing, including sound localization, release from masking for speech understanding in noise and binaural sensitivity using research processors. Data from behavioral and electrophysiological studies are included, with a focus on the recent work of the authors and their collaborators. The effects of auditory plasticity and deprivation on the emergence of binaural and spatial hearing are discussed along with evidence for reorganized processing from both behavioral and electrophysiological studies. The consequences of both unilateral and bilateral auditory deprivation during development suggest that the relevant set of issues is highly complex with regard to successes and the limitations experienced by children receiving bilateral cochlear implants. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled <Annual Reviews 2016>.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26828740      PMCID: PMC5647834          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2016.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  90 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of sound localization in mammals.

Authors:  Benedikt Grothe; Michael Pecka; David McAlpine
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 37.312

2.  Interregional brain interactions in children with unilateral hearing loss.

Authors:  Kathleen Tibbetts; Banan Ead; Amy Umansky; Rebecca Coalson; Bradley L Schlaggar; Jill B Firszt; Judith E C Lieu
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 3.497

3.  Speech intelligibility in free field: spatial unmasking in preschool children.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Auditory critical periods: a review from system's perspective.

Authors:  A Kral
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Effect of mismatched place-of-stimulation on binaural fusion and lateralization in bilateral cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Alan Kan; Corey Stoelb; Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Is adolescence a sensitive period for sociocultural processing?

Authors:  Sarah-Jayne Blakemore; Kathryn L Mills
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 24.137

7.  Of kittens and kids: altered cortical maturation following profound deafness and cochlear implant use.

Authors:  C W Ponton; J J Eggermont
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.854

8.  Auditory cortical responses in humans with profound unilateral sensorineural hearing loss from early childhood.

Authors:  J P Vasama; J P Mäkelä
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  B Robert Peters; Ruth Litovsky; Aaron Parkinson; Jennifer Lake
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Factors influencing consistent device use in pediatric recipients of bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Matthew B Fitzgerald; Janet E Green; Yixin Fang; Susan B Waltzman
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2013-03-18
View more
  30 in total

1.  The Effect of Cochlear Implant Interval on Spoken Language Skills of Pediatric Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Kaitlyn A Wenrich; Lisa S Davidson; Rosalie M Uchanski
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Binaural sensitivity in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Erica Ehlers; Matthew J Goupell; Yi Zheng; Shelly P Godar; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  [Bilateral cochlear implants].

Authors:  J Müller
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 4.  Innovative pharmaceutical approaches for the management of inner ear disorders.

Authors:  Umberto M Musazzi; Silvia Franzé; Francesco Cilurzo
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.617

5.  Unilateral Hearing Loss: Understanding Speech Recognition and Localization Variability-Implications for Cochlear Implant Candidacy.

Authors:  Jill B Firszt; Ruth M Reeder; Laura K Holden
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  A Longitudinal Study in Children With Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implants: Time Course for the Second Implanted Ear and Bilateral Performance.

Authors:  Ruth M Reeder; Jill B Firszt; Jamie H Cadieux; Michael J Strube
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Effects of Early Acoustic Hearing on Speech Perception and Language for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Ann E Geers; Rosalie M Uchanski; Jill B Firszt
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  The Effect of Simulated Interaural Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking.

Authors:  Matthew J Goupell; Corey A Stoelb; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Spectral-Temporal Modulated Ripple Discrimination by Children With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  David M Landsberger; Monica Padilla; Amy S Martinez; Laurie S Eisenberg
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 10.  Bilateral Cochlear Implantation: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2018-10-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.