Literature DB >> 21886517

Advancing performance measurement in oncology: quality oncology practice initiative participation and quality outcomes.

Francis X Campion1, Leanne R Larson, Pamela J Kadlubek, Craig C Earle, Michael N Neuss.   

Abstract

The American health care system, including the cancer care system, is under pressure to improve patient outcomes and lower the cost of care. Government payers have articulated an interest in partnering with the private sector to create learning communities to measure quality and improve the value of health care. In 2006, the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) unveiled the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI), which has become a key component of the measurement system to promote quality cancer care. QOPI is a physician-led, voluntary, practice-based, quality-improvement program, using performance measurement and benchmarking among oncology practices across the United States. Since its inception, ASCO's QOPI has grown steadily to include 973 practices as of November 2010. One key area that QOPI has addressed is end-of-life care. During the most recent data collection cycle in the Fall of 2010, those practices completing multiple data collection cycles had better performance on care of pain compared with sites participating for the first time (62.61% v 46.89%). Similarly, repeat QOPI participants demonstrated meaningfully better performance than their peers in the rate of documenting discussions of hospice and palliative care (62.42% v 54.65%) and higher rates of hospice enrollment. QOPI demonstrates how a strong performance measurement program can lead to improved quality and value of care for patients.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21886517      PMCID: PMC3092462          DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pract        ISSN: 1554-7477            Impact factor:   3.840


  19 in total

1.  Why observational studies should be among the tools used in comparative effectiveness research.

Authors:  Nancy A Dreyer; Sean R Tunis; Marc Berger; Dan Ollendorf; Pattra Mattox; Richard Gliklich
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Survival of Medicare patients after enrollment in hospice programs.

Authors:  N A Christakis; J J Escarce
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-07-18       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The triple aim: care, health, and cost.

Authors:  Donald M Berwick; Thomas W Nolan; John Whittington
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 4.  Development of stroke performance measures: definitions, methods, and current measures.

Authors:  Mathew J Reeves; Carol Parker; Gregg C Fonarow; Eric E Smith; Lee H Schwamm
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  A process for measuring the quality of cancer care: the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative.

Authors:  Michael N Neuss; Christopher E Desch; Kristen K McNiff; Peter D Eisenberg; Dean H Gesme; Joseph O Jacobson; Mohammad Jahanzeb; Jennifer J Padberg; John M Rainey; Jeff J Guo; Joseph V Simone
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Resource utilization for ovarian cancer patients at the end of life: how much is too much?

Authors:  Sharyn N Lewin; Barbara M Buttin; Matthew A Powell; Randall K Gibb; Janet S Rader; David G Mutch; Thomas J Herzog
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 7.  A framework for assessing quality indicators for cancer care at the end of life.

Authors:  Hsien Seow; Claire F Snyder; Richard A Mularski; Lisa R Shugarman; Jean S Kutner; Karl A Lorenz; Albert W Wu; Sydney M Dy
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.612

8.  Indicators of survival duration in ovarian cancer and implications for aggressiveness of care.

Authors:  Vivian von Gruenigen; Barbara Daly; Heidi Gibbons; Jessica Hutchins; Andrew Green
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Use of chemotherapy at end of life in oncology patients.

Authors:  S Kao; J Shafiq; J Vardy; D Adams
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-05-25       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Gynecologic oncology patients' satisfaction and symptom severity during palliative chemotherapy.

Authors:  Vivian E von Gruenigen; Jessica R Hutchins; Anne Marie Reidy; Heidi E Gibbons; Barbara J Daly; Elisa M Eldermire; Nancy L Fusco
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 3.186

View more
  42 in total

1.  Evolution of the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative supportive care quality measures portfolio and conformance at a Veterans Affairs medical center.

Authors:  Ryan D Nipp; Michael J Kelley; Christina D Williams; Arif H Kamal
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Physician inter-annotator agreement in the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative manual abstraction task.

Authors:  Jeremy L Warner; Peter Anick; Reed E Drews
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  Hospice Utilization in Elderly Patients With Brain Metastases.

Authors:  Elie K Mehanna; Paul J Catalano; Daniel N Cagney; Daphne A Haas-Kogan; Brian M Alexander; James A Tulsky; Ayal A Aizer
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Physician level reporting of surgical and pathology performance indicators: a regional study to assess feasibility and impact on quality.

Authors:  Craig McFadyen; Sara Lankshear; Dimitrios Divaris; Mark Berry; Amber Hunter; John Srigley; Jonathan Irish
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Use of care management practices in small- and medium-sized physician groups: do public reporting of physician quality and financial incentives matter?

Authors:  Jeffrey A Alexander; Daniel Maeng; Lawrence P Casalino; Diane Rittenhouse
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Clinical practice guidelines for cancer care: utilization and expectations of the practicing oncologist.

Authors:  Melissa Dillmon; John M Goldberg; Suresh S Ramalingam; Robert J Mayer; Patrick Loehrer; Catherine Van Poznak
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  The Victorian Lung Cancer Registry pilot: improving the quality of lung cancer care through the use of a disease quality registry.

Authors:  Rob G Stirling; S M Evans; P McLaughlin; M Senthuren; J Millar; J Gooi; L Irving; P Mitchell; A Haydon; J Ruben; M Conron; T Leong; N Watkins; J J McNeil
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 8.  Quality measures for palliative care in patients with cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Arif H Kamal; Margaret Gradison; Jennifer M Maguire; Donald Taylor; Amy P Abernethy
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 3.840

9.  Patient-centered and efficacious advance care planning in cancer: Protocol and key design considerations for the PEACe-compare trial.

Authors:  Judith M Resick; Robert M Arnold; Rebecca L Sudore; David Farrell; Shane Belin; Andrew D Althouse; Betty Ferrell; Bernard J Hammes; Edward Chu; Douglas B White; Kimberly J Rak; Yael Schenker
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 2.226

10.  Perspectives of quality care in cancer treatment: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Lisa M Hess; Gerhardt Pohl
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2013-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.