Literature DB >> 20489174

Development of stroke performance measures: definitions, methods, and current measures.

Mathew J Reeves1, Carol Parker, Gregg C Fonarow, Eric E Smith, Lee H Schwamm.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: In the United States and elsewhere, stroke performance measures have been developed to monitor and improve the quality of care. The process by which these measures are developed, implemented, and evaluated is complex, evolving, and not widely understood. We review the methodological development of stroke performance measures in the United States.
METHODS: A literature search identified articles that addressed the development and endorsement of performance measures for stroke care. Emphasis was given to articles specific to acute stroke, but when these were lacking, other cardiovascular diseases were included.
RESULTS: Ten process-based performance measures relevant to acute hospital-based stroke care have now been developed and endorsed. These measures include intravenous thrombolysis, deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis, dysphagia screening, stroke education, and discharge-related medications and assessments. There are currently at least 5 major US-based stroke quality improvement programs implementing stroke measures. Data indicate that rapid improvements in the quality of stroke care can be induced by the systematic collection and evaluation of stroke performance measures. However, current stroke measures are relatively limited, addressing only inpatient care and mostly patients with ischemic stroke.
CONCLUSIONS: Stroke quality improvement is still in its early stages, but data suggest that large-scale improvements in stroke care can result from the implementation of stroke performance measures. Performance measures that address multidisciplinary stroke unit care, outpatient-based care, and patient-oriented outcomes such as functional recovery should be considered. Ongoing challenges relevant to stroke quality improvement include the role of public reporting and the need to link better stroke care to improved patient outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20489174     DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.577171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  24 in total

1.  Estimating and reporting on the quality of inpatient stroke care by Veterans Health Administration Medical Centers.

Authors:  Greg Arling; Mathew Reeves; Joseph Ross; Linda S Williams; Salomeh Keyhani; Neale Chumbler; Michael S Phipps; Christianne Roumie; Laura J Myers; Amanda H Salanitro; Diana L Ordin; Jennifer Myers; Dawn M Bravata
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2011-12-06

2.  Stroke Performance Measures Do Not Predict Functional Outcome.

Authors:  Eric E Adelman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Melinda A Smith; Jonggyu Baek; Erin C Case; Brisa N Sánchez; James F Burke; Lesli E Skolarus; Darin B Zahuranec; William J Meurer; Devin L Brown; Kevin A Kerber; Deborah A Levine; Nelda M Garcia; Morgan S Campbell; Lewis B Morgenstern
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2016-10-26

3.  Comparison of Acute Ischemic Stroke Care and Outcomes Between Comprehensive Stroke Centers and Primary Stroke Centers in the United States.

Authors:  Shumei Man; Xin Zhao; Ken Uchino; M Shazam Hussain; Eric E Smith; Deepak L Bhatt; Ying Xian; Lee H Schwamm; Shreyansh Shah; Yosef Khan; Gregg C Fonarow
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2018-06

4.  Advancing performance measurement in oncology: quality oncology practice initiative participation and quality outcomes.

Authors:  Francis X Campion; Leanne R Larson; Pamela J Kadlubek; Craig C Earle; Michael N Neuss
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  Standard strategies for acute ischemic stroke within the rtPA therapeutic window: China.

Authors:  Yongjun Wang; Ruijun Ji
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2013-06

Review 6.  Swallowing screens after acute stroke: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sara K Schepp; David L Tirschwell; Robert M Miller; W T Longstreth
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Quality measures in stroke.

Authors:  Sharon N Poisson; S Andrew Josephson
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2011-04

Review 8.  Association between patient outcomes and key performance indicators of stroke care quality: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Gerard Urimubenshi; Peter Langhorne; Dominique A Cadilhac; Jeanne N Kagwiza; Olivia Wu
Journal:  Eur Stroke J       Date:  2017-10-05

9.  Defect-free care trends in the Paul Coverdell National Acute Stroke Program, 2008-2018.

Authors:  Katherine J Overwyk; Xiaoping Yin; Xin Tong; Sallyann M Coleman King; Jennifer L Wiltz
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Associations between the organisation of stroke services, process of care, and mortality in England: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Benjamin D Bray; Salma Ayis; James Campbell; Alex Hoffman; Michael Roughton; Pippa J Tyrrell; Charles D A Wolfe; Anthony G Rudd
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-05-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.