Literature DB >> 16087948

A process for measuring the quality of cancer care: the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative.

Michael N Neuss1, Christopher E Desch, Kristen K McNiff, Peter D Eisenberg, Dean H Gesme, Joseph O Jacobson, Mohammad Jahanzeb, Jennifer J Padberg, John M Rainey, Jeff J Guo, Joseph V Simone.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) is a practice-based system of quality self-assessment sponsored by the participants and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). The process of quality evaluation, development of the pilot questionnaire, and preliminary results are reported.
METHODS: Physicians from seven oncology groups developed medical record abstraction measures based on practice guidelines and consensus-supported indicators of quality care. Each practice completed two rounds of records review and received practice and aggregate results. Mean frequencies of responses for each indicator were compared among practices.
RESULTS: Participants universally, if informally, find QOPI helpful, and results show statistically significant variation among practices for several indicators, including assessing pain in patients close to death, documentation of informed consent for chemotherapy, and concordance with granulocytic and erythroid growth factor administration guidelines. Measures with universally high concordance include the use of serotonin antagonist antiemetics according to the ASCO guideline; the presence of a pathology report in the record; the use of chemotherapy flow sheets; and adherence to standard chemotherapy recommendations for patients with certain stages of breast, colon, and rectal cancer. Concordance with quality indicators significantly changed between survey rounds for several measures.
CONCLUSION: Pilot results indicate that the QOPI process provides a rapid and objective measurement of practice quality that allows comparisons among practices and over time. It also provides a mechanism for measuring concordance with published guidelines. Most importantly, it provides a tool for practice self-examination that can promote excellence in cancer care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16087948     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.948

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  76 in total

1.  Improving quality and addressing the rising costs of cancer care: two birds, one stone.

Authors:  Jason Luke; Joshua Mirkin; Peter Bach
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Physicians Guided by First-Round Data From QOPI.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.840

3.  QOPI, EHRs, and Quality Measures.

Authors:  Joel W Goldwein; Christopher M Rose
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  QOPI, EHRs, and Quality Measurement.

Authors:  Joel W Goldwein; Christopher M Rose
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.840

5.  The quality oncology practice initiative: assessing and improving care within the medical oncology practice.

Authors:  Kristen McNiff
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Translating Evidence Into Practice (and back).

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; Christopher E Desch
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Physician perspectives on colorectal cancer surveillance care in a changing environment.

Authors:  Jane Zapka; Katherine R Sterba; Nancy LaPelle; Kent Armeson; Dana R Burshell; Marvella E Ford
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2015-04-15

8.  Leveraging Digital Data to Inform and Improve Quality Cancer Care.

Authors:  Tina Hernandez-Boussard; Douglas W Blayney; James D Brooks
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Cancer of the head and neck: a set of indicators based on register and administrative data.

Authors:  A Andreano; M Ansarin; D Alterio; R Bruschini; M G Valsecchi; A G Russo
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.124

10.  Selecting high priority quality measures for breast cancer quality improvement.

Authors:  Michael J Hassett; Melissa E Hughes; Joyce C Niland; Rebecca Ottesen; Stephen B Edge; Michael A Bookman; Robert W Carlson; Richard L Theriault; Jane C Weeks
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.