Literature DB >> 19775860

A framework for assessing quality indicators for cancer care at the end of life.

Hsien Seow1, Claire F Snyder, Richard A Mularski, Lisa R Shugarman, Jean S Kutner, Karl A Lorenz, Albert W Wu, Sydney M Dy.   

Abstract

Patients with advanced cancer often do not receive high-quality pain and symptom management or support with coordination of care, communication, and decision making. Implementing quality indicators that are reflective of the scope of care, feasible to implement, and supported by evidence might help to identify areas and settings most in need of improvement. However, recent reviews and policy initiatives identified only a few indicators that met these criteria. To help advance quality indicator development and implementation in this area, we developed a conceptual framework based on previous related initiatives, updated reviews of end-of-life cancer quality indicators and relevant data sources, and expert input. The framework describes five steps for developing and assessing a quality indicator for end-of-life care, defining the 1) population of focus, 2) broad quality domains, 3) specific target areas, 4) steps of the care process, and 5) evaluation criteria for quality indicators. The defined population includes seriously or terminally ill cancer patients, who are unlikely to recover or stabilize, and their families. Domains include the structure and processes of care; the physical, psychiatric, psychosocial, spiritual, and cultural aspects of care; as well as the care of the imminently dying, ethical and legal issues, and the delivery of care. Evaluation criteria include importance; scientific acceptability, including validity, evidence to improve outcomes, reliability, responsiveness, and variability; usability; and feasibility, including ready data sources. By using this conceptual framework, indicator developers, researchers, and policymakers can refine and implement indicator sets to effectively evaluate and improve care at the end of life.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19775860     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.04.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage        ISSN: 0885-3924            Impact factor:   3.612


  16 in total

1.  Palliative care quality indicators in Italy. What do we evaluate?

Authors:  Daniela D'Angelo; Chiara Mastroianni; Ercole Vellone; Rosaria Alvaro; Giuseppe Casale; Roberto Latina; Maria Grazia De Marinis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Developing successful models of cancer palliative care services.

Authors:  Marie Bakitas; Margaret Firer Bishop; Paula Caron; Lisa Stephens
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.315

3.  Advancing performance measurement in oncology: quality oncology practice initiative participation and quality outcomes.

Authors:  Francis X Campion; Leanne R Larson; Pamela J Kadlubek; Craig C Earle; Michael N Neuss
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.840

4.  A Survey to Evaluate Facilitators and Barriers to Quality Measurement and Improvement: Adapting Tools for Implementation Research in Palliative Care Programs.

Authors:  Sydney M Dy; Nebras Abu Al Hamayel; Susan M Hannum; Ritu Sharma; Sarina R Isenberg; Kamini Kuchinad; Junya Zhu; Katherine Smith; Karl A Lorenz; Arif H Kamal; Anne M Walling; Sallie J Weaver
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  Disparities in end of life care for elderly lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Preethy Nayar; Fang Qiu; Shinobu Watanabe-Galloway; Eugene Boilesen; Hongmei Wang; Lina Lander; Monirul Islam
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2014-10

6.  Nature of Discussions about Systemic Therapy Discontinuation or Hospice among Patients, Families, and Palliative Care Clinicians during Care for Incurable Cancer: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Lara Traeger; Chelsea Rapoport; Emily Wright; Areej El-Jawahri; Joseph A Greer; Elyse R Park; Vicki A Jackson; Jennifer S Temel
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 7.  Achieving Goal-Concordant Care: A Conceptual Model and Approach to Measuring Serious Illness Communication and Its Impact.

Authors:  Justin J Sanders; J Randall Curtis; James A Tulsky
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 8.  Outcome assessment instruments in palliative and hospice care--a review of the literature.

Authors:  Stephanie Stiel; T Pastrana; C Balzer; F Elsner; C Ostgathe; L Radbruch
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  How can we improve outcomes for patients and families under palliative care? Implementing clinical audit for quality improvement in resource limited settings.

Authors:  Lucy Selman; Richard Harding
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2010-01

10.  Towards a standardized method of developing quality indicators for palliative care: protocol of the Quality indicators for Palliative Care (Q-PAC) study.

Authors:  Kathleen Leemans; Joachim Cohen; Anneke L Francke; Robert Vander Stichele; Susanne Jj Claessen; Lieve Van den Block; Luc Deliens
Journal:  BMC Palliat Care       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 3.234

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.