Literature DB >> 23598844

Clinical practice guidelines for cancer care: utilization and expectations of the practicing oncologist.

Melissa Dillmon1, John M Goldberg, Suresh S Ramalingam, Robert J Mayer, Patrick Loehrer, Catherine Van Poznak.   

Abstract

ASCO produces guidelines for oncologists, utilizing a systematic review process. Although this resource-intense process results in authoritative and widely cited guidelines, they can cover only a few specific clinical issues. Hence, the ASCO guidelines presently do not fully address many clinical situations. Expanding the scope of ASCO guidelines will require major revisions to the guidelines development process. Changes likely to improve the process include establishing disease-specific committees composed of content experts, improving methods to resolve conflicts of interest, simplifying steps to engage members to suggest topics for new guidelines, and linking guidelines utilization with quality indices. In a time of rapid change in practice and research in cancer, ASCO can play a pivotal role in patient care through major revisions to guideline development, accessibility, and integration with quality metrics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23598844      PMCID: PMC3500479          DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2012.000599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oncol Pract        ISSN: 1554-7477            Impact factor:   3.840


  8 in total

1.  Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions.

Authors:  J M Grimshaw; L Shirran; R Thomas; G Mowatt; C Fraser; L Bero; R Grilli; E Harvey; A Oxman; M A O'Brien
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Perspectives on the value of American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical guidelines as reported by oncologists and health maintenance organizations.

Authors:  Charles L Bennett; Mark R Somerfield; David G Pfister; Cecilia Tomori; Sofia Yakren; Peter B Bach
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Managed care & medical oncology: the focus is on value.

Authors:  Elizabeth Danielson; Jessica Demartino; Jill A Mullen
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 11.908

4.  American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guidelines: opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  Mark R Somerfield; Kaitlin Einhaus; Karen L Hagerty; Melissa C Brouwers; Jerome Seidenfeld; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Advancing performance measurement in oncology: quality oncology practice initiative participation and quality outcomes.

Authors:  Francis X Campion; Leanne R Larson; Pamela J Kadlubek; Craig C Earle; Michael N Neuss
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Level of scientific evidence underlying recommendations arising from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Thejaswi K Poonacha; Ronald S Go
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on fertility preservation in cancer patients.

Authors:  Stephanie J Lee; Leslie R Schover; Ann H Partridge; Pasquale Patrizio; W Hamish Wallace; Karen Hagerty; Lindsay N Beck; Lawrence V Brennan; Kutluk Oktay
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  A cluster randomized controlled trial comparing three methods of disseminating practice guidelines for children with croup [ISRCTN73394937].

Authors:  David W Johnson; William Craig; Rollin Brant; Craig Mitton; Larry Svenson; Terry P Klassen
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 7.327

  8 in total
  5 in total

1.  Multidisciplinary Treatment of Non-Spine Bone Metastases: Results of a Modified Delphi Consensus Process.

Authors:  Erin F Gillespie; Noah J Mathis; Max Vaynrub; Ernesto Santos Martin; Rupesh Kotecha; Joseph Panoff; Andrew L Salner; Alyson F McIntosh; Ranju Gupta; Amitabh Gulati; Divya Yerramilli; Amy J Xu; Meredith Bartelstein; David M Guttmann; Yoshiya J Yamada; Diana Lin; Kaitlyn Lapen; Deborah Korenstein; David G Pfister; Allison Lipitz-Snyderman; Jonathan T Yang
Journal:  Clin Transl Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-04-26

2.  Personal Payments from Pharmaceutical Companies to Authors of Oncology Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Aaron P Mitchell; Akriti Mishra; Pranam Dey; Michael A Curry; Niti U Trivedi; Michael Haddadin; Mohammed W Rahman; Aaron N Winn; Stacie B Dusetzina; Peter B Bach
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-05-26

3.  Assessment of guideline adherence in breast cancer management among oncologists in Nigeria.

Authors:  Bolanle C Adegboyega; Adewumi O Alabi; Adedayo O Joseph; Nwamaka Lasebikan; Luther A Agaga; Kehinde O Ololade; Anthonia C Sowunmi
Journal:  Ecancermedicalscience       Date:  2021-09-23

4.  A quantitative method for assessment of prescribing patterns using electronic health records.

Authors:  Dukyong Yoon; Inwhee Park; Martijn J Schuemie; Man Young Park; Ju Han Kim; Rae Woong Park
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Improving communication between the general practitioner and the oncologist: a key role in coordinating care for patients suffering from cancer.

Authors:  Vladimir Druel; Laetitia Gimenez; Kim Paricaud; Jean-Pierre Delord; Pascale Grosclaude; Nathalie Boussier; Marie-Eve Rougé Bugat
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.