Literature DB >> 20921481

Why observational studies should be among the tools used in comparative effectiveness research.

Nancy A Dreyer1, Sean R Tunis, Marc Berger, Dan Ollendorf, Pattra Mattox, Richard Gliklich.   

Abstract

Doctors, patients, and other decision makers need access to the best available clinical evidence, which can come from systematic reviews, experimental trials, and observational research. Despite methodological challenges, high-quality observational studies have an important role in comparative effectiveness research because they can address issues that are otherwise difficult or impossible to study. In addition, many clinical and policy decisions do not require the very high levels of certainty provided by large, rigorous randomized trials. This paper provides insights and a framework to guide good decision making that involves the full range of high-quality comparative effectiveness research techniques, including observational research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20921481     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  65 in total

1.  Transformative Use of an Improved All-Payer Hospital Discharge Data Infrastructure for Community-Based Participatory Research: A Sustainability Pathway.

Authors:  Jason L Salemi; Abraham A Salinas-Miranda; Roneé E Wilson; Hamisu M Salihu
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Comparative effectiveness research in urology.

Authors:  Amy T Wang; Jeffrey K Wang; Victor M Montori; Mohammad Hassan Murad
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Carrying out streamlined routine data analyses with reports for observational studies: introduction to a series of generic SAS ® macros.

Authors:  Yuan Liu; Dana C Nickleach; Chao Zhang; Jeffrey M Switchenko; Jeanne Kowalski
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-12-19

4.  Gender differences in the real-world effectiveness of smoking cessation medications: Findings from the 2010-2011 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey.

Authors:  Philip H Smith; Ju Zhang; Andrea H Weinberger; Carolyn M Mazure; Sherry A McKee
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 4.492

5.  The challenge of conducting comparative effectiveness research in cancer: the impact of a fragmented U.S. health-care system.

Authors:  Paul A Fishman; Mark C Hornbrook; Debra P Ritzwoller; Maureen C O'Keeffe-Rosetti; Jennifer Elston Lafata; Ramzi G Salloum
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2013

6.  Advancing performance measurement in oncology: quality oncology practice initiative participation and quality outcomes.

Authors:  Francis X Campion; Leanne R Larson; Pamela J Kadlubek; Craig C Earle; Michael N Neuss
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Evaluation of informatics systems: beyond RCTs and beyond the hospital.

Authors:  Harold Lehmannm; Lucila Ohno-Machado
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

8.  Perspective: NutriGrade: A Scoring System to Assess and Judge the Meta-Evidence of Randomized Controlled Trials and Cohort Studies in Nutrition Research.

Authors:  Lukas Schwingshackl; Sven Knüppel; Carolina Schwedhelm; Georg Hoffmann; Benjamin Missbach; Marta Stelmach-Mardas; Stefan Dietrich; Fabian Eichelmann; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Khalid Iqbal; Krasimira Aleksandrova; Stefan Lorkowski; Michael F Leitzmann; Anja Kroke; Heiner Boeing
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 9.  Comparative effectiveness research in the "real" world: lessons learned in a study of treatment-resistant hypertension.

Authors:  Marilyn A Laken; Rosalind Dawson; Otis Engelman; Oscar Lovelace; Charles Way; Brent M Egan
Journal:  J Am Soc Hypertens       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb

10.  Rationale and Design of the Registry for Stones of the Kidney and Ureter (ReSKU): A Prospective Observational Registry to Study the Natural History of Urolithiasis Patients.

Authors:  Helena C Chang; David T Tzou; Manint Usawachintachit; Brian D Duty; Ryan S Hsi; Jonathan D Harper; Mathew D Sorensen; Marshall L Stoller; Roger L Sur; Thomas Chi
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 2.942

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.