Literature DB >> 3724111

Masked and filtered simulation of hearing loss: effects on consonant recognition.

D A Fabry, D J Van Tasell.   

Abstract

Hearing threshold configuration of the impaired ear was simulated via two different methods in the normal ear of each of 6 subjects with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. The two hearing loss simulation methods were frequency-specific attenuation (filtering), and masking by shaped masking noise. Identification responses to 20 consonant-vowel nonsense syllables were obtained from the normal ear of each subject in the two hearing loss simulation conditions, as well as from the impaired ear. Speech data were scored both for overall percent correct consonant recognition and for error patterns on a set of eight consonant features. The computed correlation between gross error difference scores and a similarity metric for feature error pattern was essentially zero, indicating that these may be relatively independent measures of speech recognition, and thus may reflect different aspects of subjects' behavior. For 3 subjects, both masking and filtering successfully simulated the effects of sensorineural hearing loss on consonant feature error patterns. For 1 subject, only filtering produced feature error patterns similar to those of the impaired ear. For the remaining subjects, neither simulation was successful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3724111     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.2902.170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  4 in total

1.  Temporal masking functions for listeners with real and simulated hearing loss.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of degree and configuration of hearing loss on the contribution of high- and low-frequency speech information to bilateral speech understanding.

Authors:  Benjamin W Y Hornsby; Earl E Johnson; Erin Picou
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Within-consonant perceptual differences in the hearing impaired ear.

Authors:  Andrea Trevino; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Recognition of synthetic speech by hearing-impaired elderly listeners.

Authors:  L E Humes; K J Nelson; D B Pisoni
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1991-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.