Literature DB >> 6482414

Temporal gap detection in sensorineural and simulated hearing impairments.

M Florentine, S Buus.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to assess the effect of the configuration of a hearing loss on gap detection and to determine if hearing impairment affects temporal resolution, per se. The minimum detectable gap duration, MDG, in a low-pass (cut-off at 7 kHz) noise was measured monaurally as a function of sound pressure level in six listeners with normal hearing, seven with hearing impairments of primarily cochlear origin, and eight with impairments simulated by masking. The impaired listeners' MDGs at 80 and 90 dB vary from about 3.5 ms (equal to the normal MDG) to about 8 ms and show little correlation with their average HL. At lower levels, the MDG is enlarged for all impaired listeners owing to the decreased SL of the noise. Most of the enlargement of the MDG could be reproduced by presenting a normal listener with a masking noise spectrally shaped to simulate the impaired listener's audiogram. However, at high levels, some impaired listeners performed worse than their simulated-loss counterparts, indicating that temporal resolution per se may be reduced in some, but not all, impaired listeners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6482414     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.2703.449

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  25 in total

1.  Aspects of temporal information processing: a dimensional analysis.

Authors:  Thomas H Rammsayer; Susanne Brandler
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2004-01-31

2.  The role of temporal cues in word identification by younger and older adults: effects of sentence context.

Authors:  Sandra Gordon-Salant; Grace Yeni-Komshian; Peter Fitzgibbons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Discrimination of time-reversed harmonic complexes by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Amanda M Lauer; Michelle Molis; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-08-25

4.  The effect of temporal gap identification on speech perception by users of cochlear implants.

Authors:  Elad Sagi; Adam R Kaiser; Ted A Meyer; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2008-09-19       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Temporal masking functions for listeners with real and simulated hearing loss.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Temporal discrimination as a function of marker duration.

Authors:  T H Rammsayer; D Leutner
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-11

7.  Predicting Speech Recognition Using the Speech Intelligibility Index and Other Variables for Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Sungmin Lee; Lisa Lucks Mendel; Gavin M Bidelman
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Intelligibility and Clarity of Reverberant Speech: Effects of Wide Dynamic Range Compression Release Time and Working Memory.

Authors:  Paul N Reinhart; Pamela E Souza
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Sensorineural hearing loss and neural correlates of temporal acuity in the inferior colliculus of the C57BL/6 mouse.

Authors:  Joseph P Walton; Kathy Barsz; Willard W Wilson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-11-10

Review 10.  Review article: review of the literature on temporal resolution in listeners with cochlear hearing impairment: a critical assessment of the role of suprathreshold deficits.

Authors:  Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Patrick M Zurek
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-12-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.