Literature DB >> 3584685

Recognition of nonsense syllables by hearing-impaired listeners and by noise-masked normal hearers.

L E Humes, D D Dirks, T S Bell, G E Kincaid.   

Abstract

In the present study, speech-recognition performance was measured in four hearing-impaired subjects and twelve normal hearers. The normal hearers were divided into four groups of three subjects each. Speech-recognition testing for the normal hearers was accomplished in a background of spectrally shaped noise in which the noise was shaped to produce masked thresholds identical to the quiet thresholds of one of the hearing-impaired subjects. The question addressed in this study is whether normal hearers with a hearing loss simulated through a shaped masking noise demonstrate speech-recognition difficulties similar to those of listeners with actual hearing impairment. Regarding overall percent-correct scores, the results indicated that two of the four hearing-impaired subjects performed better than their corresponding subgroup of noise-masked normal hearers, whereas the other two impaired listeners performed like the noise-masked normal listeners. A gross analysis of the types of errors made suggested that subjects with actual and simulated losses frequently made different types of errors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3584685     DOI: 10.1121/1.394845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  5 in total

1.  Speech reception by listeners with real and simulated hearing impairment: effects of continuous and interrupted noise.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Temporal masking functions for listeners with real and simulated hearing loss.

Authors:  Joseph G Desloge; Charlotte M Reed; Louis D Braida; Zachary D Perez; Lorraine A Delhorne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effect of fundamental-frequency and sentence-onset differences on speech-identification performance of young and older adults in a competing-talker background.

Authors:  Jae Hee Lee; Larry E Humes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Consonant recognition loss in hearing impaired listeners.

Authors:  Sandeep A Phatak; Yang-Soo Yoon; David M Gooler; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Recognition of synthetic speech by hearing-impaired elderly listeners.

Authors:  L E Humes; K J Nelson; D B Pisoni
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1991-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.