Literature DB >> 25399345

Assessing the accuracy of patient-specific guides for total knee arthroplasty.

Jong-Keun Seon1, Hyeong-Won Park2, Seung-Hyun Yoo1, Eun-Kyoo Song1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patient-specific guides have been introduced recently as a means of making accurate bone cuts through custom cutting blocks constructed based on pre-operative three-dimensional imaging. However, the controversy concerning the improved results of patient-specific guides have not been resolved yet; in addition, there have been no studies to investigate the causes of variable with inconsistent results and solutions for the causes.
METHODS: Thirty eight patients (38 knees) underwent total knee arthroplasty with patient-specific guides. The mean age of the patients was 68 years (SD ± 6.3), and all patients had a minimum 2-year follow-up. An intra-operative alignment using navigation and the causes of outliers were evaluated.
RESULTS: An average coronal alignment of PSI jigs was 0.5° (SD ± 0.9°) in femur and 0.1° (SD ± 0.8°) in tibia, and the number of outliers was two and three cases, respectively. An average sagittal alignment was 0.6° (SD ± 0.9°) in femur and 5.5° (SD ± 1.1°) in tibia, and the number of outliers was three and five cases, respectively. All outliers resulted from large osteophytes near the contact point of patient-specific guides which disturb sitting of the guide.
CONCLUSION: It was suggested that patient-specific guides were an effective and safe method to achieve accurate alignments, with no additional intra-operative complication. It is important to note that surgeons need to be precautious using the patient-specific instrumentation in patients with severe varus deformity. In addition, existing osteophytes which disturb sitting of the guides should be carefully evaluated pre-operatively and intra-operatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Navigation; Outlier; Patient-specific guides; Total knee arthroplasty; Verification

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25399345     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3429-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  22 in total

1.  Accuracy of a computer-assisted navigation system for total knee replacement.

Authors:  R P Pitto; A J Graydon; L Bradley; S F Malak; C G Walker; I A Anderson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-05

2.  Computer-assisted surgery versus manual total knee arthroplasty: a case-controlled study.

Authors:  S David Stulberg; Mark A Yaffe; Samuel S Koo
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty (OtisKnee) results in malalignment.

Authors:  Brian A Klatt; Nitin Goyal; Matthew S Austin; William J Hozack
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Reliability of lower extremity alignment measurement using radiographs and PACS.

Authors:  R G Marx; P Grimm; K A Lillemoe; C M Robertson; O R Ayeni; S Lyman; E A Bogner; H Pavlov
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-03-23       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Evaluation of the accuracy of a patient-specific instrumentation by navigation.

Authors:  Fabio Conteduca; Raffaele Iorio; Daniele Mazza; Ludovico Caperna; Gabriele Bolle; Giuseppe Argento; Andrea Ferretti
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Do patient-specific guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Ryan M Nunley; Bradley S Ellison; Jinjun Zhu; Erin L Ruh; Stephen M Howell; Robert L Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA.

Authors:  Vincent Y Ng; Jeffrey H DeClaire; Keith R Berend; Bethany C Gulick; Adolph V Lombardi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Can computer assistance improve the clinical and functional scores in total knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Daniel Hernández-Vaquero; Abelardo Suarez-Vazquez; Susana Iglesias-Fernandez
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Residual varus alignment does not compromise results of TKAs in patients with preoperative varus.

Authors:  Robert A Magnussen; Florent Weppe; Guillaume Demey; Elvire Servien; Sébastien Lustig
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty does not match the pre-operative plan as assessed by intra-operative computer-assisted navigation.

Authors:  Corey Scholes; Varun Sahni; Sebastien Lustig; David A Parker; Myles R J Coolican
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 4.342

View more
  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of the accuracy of resected bone thickness based on patient-specific instrumentation during total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kazumasa Yamamura; Fumiaki Inori; Sadahiko Konishi
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-02-06       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  The accuracy of bony resection from patient-specific guides during total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yadin D Levy; Vincent V G An; Christopher J W Shean; Floris R Groen; Peter M Walker; Warwick J M Bruce
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  The influence of osteophyte depiction in CT for patient-specific guided hip resurfacing procedures.

Authors:  M Kunz; S Balaketheeswaran; R E Ellis; J F Rudan
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  [Research progress on comparison of the application effects between personal specific instrumentation and computer-assisted navigation surgery in total knee arthroplasty].

Authors:  Ziyang Dong; Yang Li; Hua Tian
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-11-15

Review 5.  Clinical applications and prospects of 3D printing guide templates in orthopaedics.

Authors:  Meng Meng; Jinzuo Wang; Tianze Sun; Wentao Zhang; Jing Zhang; Liming Shu; Zhonghai Li
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 4.889

6.  Clinical Outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed Using Patient-Specific Cutting Guides.

Authors:  Murat Çalbıyık
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2017-12-29

7.  Patient-specific positioning guides for total knee arthroplasty: no significant difference between final component alignment and pre-operative digital plan except for tibial rotation.

Authors:  Bert Boonen; Martijn G M Schotanus; Bart Kerens; Frans-Jan Hulsmans; Wim E Tuinebreijer; Nanne P Kort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  No improvement in reducing outliers in coronal axis alignment with patient-specific instrumentation.

Authors:  Uwe Maus; Carlos J Marques; David Scheunemann; Frank Lampe; Djordje Lazovic; Hagen Hommel; Dennis Vogel; Martin Haunschild; Tilman Pfitzner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Three-dimensional ultrasound for knee osteophyte depiction: a comparative study to computed tomography.

Authors:  Valeria Vendries; Tamas Ungi; Jordan Harry; Manuela Kunz; Jana Podlipská; Les MacKenzie; Gabriel Venne
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 2.924

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.