Literature DB >> 21873343

A critical review of audiological outcome measures for infants and children.

Marlene P Bagatto1, Sheila T Moodie, Richard C Seewald, Doreen J Bartlett, Susan D Scollie.   

Abstract

Outcome evaluation is an important stage in the pediatric hearing aid fitting process, however a systematic way of evaluating outcome in the pediatric audiology population is lacking. This is in part due to the need for an evidence-based outcome evaluation guideline for infants and children with hearing loss who wear hearing aids. As part of the development of a guideline, a critical review of the existing pediatric audiology outcome evaluation tools was conducted. Subjective outcome evaluation tools that measure auditory-related behaviors in children from birth to 6 years of age were critically appraised using a published grading system (Andresen, 2000). Of the tools that exist, 12 were appraised because they met initial criteria outlined by the Network of Pediatric Audiologists of Canada as being appropriate for children birth to 6 years of age who wear hearing aids. Tools that were considered for the guideline scored high in both statistical and feasibility criteria. The subjective outcome evaluation tools that were ultimately chosen to be included in the guideline were the LittlEARS Auditory Questionnaire (Tsiakpini et al., 2004) and the Parents' Evaluation of Aural/Oral Performance of Children (PEACH) Rating Scale (Ching & Hill, 2005b) due to the high grades they received in the critical review and their target age ranges. Following this critical review of pediatric outcome evaluation tools, the next step was for the Network Clinicians to evaluate the guideline (Moodie et al., 2011b).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21873343      PMCID: PMC4040835          DOI: 10.1177/1084713811412056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Amplif        ISSN: 1084-7138


  15 in total

Review 1.  Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research.

Authors:  E M Andresen
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international cooperation.

Authors:  R Cox; M Hyde; S Gatehouse; W Noble; H Dillon; R Bentler; D Stephens; S Arlinger; L Beck; D Wilkerson; S Kramer; P Kricos; J P Gagné; F Bess; L Hallberg
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 3.  Knowledge translation in audiology: promoting the clinical application of best evidence.

Authors:  Sheila T Moodie; Anita Kothari; Marlene P Bagatto; Richard Seewald; Linda T Miller; Susan D Scollie
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2011 Mar-Jun

4.  The relationship between obligatory cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) and functional measures in young infants.

Authors:  Maryanne Golding; Wendy Pearce; John Seymour; Alison Cooper; Teresa Ching; Harvey Dillon
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 5.  A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies.

Authors:  Maria J Grant; Andrew Booth
Journal:  Health Info Libr J       Date:  2009-06

6.  Evaluation of the NAL-NL1 and the DSL v.4.1 prescriptions for children: Paired-comparison intelligibility judgments and functional performance ratings.

Authors:  Teresa Y C Ching; Susan D Scollie; Harvey Dillon; Richard Seewald; Louise Britton; Jane Steinberg; Megan Gilliver; Katrina A King
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  An integrated knowledge translation experience: use of the Network of Pediatric Audiologists of Canada to facilitate the development of the University of Western Ontario Pediatric Audiological Monitoring Protocol (UWO PedAMP v1.0).

Authors:  Sheila T Moodie; Marlene P Bagatto; Linda T Miller; Anita Kothari; Richard Seewald; Susan D Scollie
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2011 Mar-Jun

Review 8.  Measures of outcomes for children and youth.

Authors:  D J Lollar; R J Simeonsson; U Nanda
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.966

9.  A parental questionnaire to evaluate children's Auditory Behavior in Everyday Life (ABEL).

Authors:  Suzanne C Purdy; Denise R Farrington; Carolyn A Moran; Linda L Chard; Shirley-Anne Hodgson
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 1.493

10.  The national protocol for paediatric amplification in Australia.

Authors:  Alison M King
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.117

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Knowledge translation in audiology: promoting the clinical application of best evidence.

Authors:  Sheila T Moodie; Anita Kothari; Marlene P Bagatto; Richard Seewald; Linda T Miller; Susan D Scollie
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2011 Mar-Jun

2.  Consumer preferences for hearing aid attributes: a comparison of rating and conjoint analysis methods.

Authors:  John F P Bridges; Angela T Lataille; Christine Buttorff; Sharon White; John K Niparko
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-04-17

3.  Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Reveal Changes in Audibility with Nonlinear Frequency Compression in Hearing Aids for Children: Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Teresa Y C Ching; Vicky W Zhang; Sanna Hou; Patricia Van Buynder
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2016-02

4.  Linguistic input, electronic media, and communication outcomes of toddlers with hearing loss.

Authors:  Sophie E Ambrose; Mark VanDam; Mary Pat Moeller
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  The University of Western Ontario Pediatric Audiological Monitoring Protocol (UWO PedAMP).

Authors:  Marlene P Bagatto; Sheila T Moodie; April C Malandrino; Frances M Richert; Debbie A Clench; Susan D Scollie
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2011 Mar-Jun

6.  An integrated knowledge translation experience: use of the Network of Pediatric Audiologists of Canada to facilitate the development of the University of Western Ontario Pediatric Audiological Monitoring Protocol (UWO PedAMP v1.0).

Authors:  Sheila T Moodie; Marlene P Bagatto; Linda T Miller; Anita Kothari; Richard Seewald; Susan D Scollie
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2011 Mar-Jun

7.  Early prelingual auditory development in Italian infants and toddlers analysed through the Italian version of the Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (IT-MAIS).

Authors:  S Cavicchiolo; F Mozzanica; L Guerzoni; A Murri; I Dall'Ora; F Ambrogi; S Barozzi; D Cuda; A Schindler
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Modification and verification of the Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale: a psychometric analysis combining item response theory with classical test theory.

Authors:  Fengling Yang; Fei Zhao; Yun Zheng; Gang Li
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Slow cortical potentials and amplification-part I: n1-p2 measures.

Authors:  Susan Marynewich; Lorienne M Jenstad; David R Stapells
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-10-18

10.  Dartanan: Prototype evaluations of a serious game to engage children in the calibration of their hearing aid functionalities.

Authors:  Madeline Hallewell; Davide Salanitri; Mirabelle D'Cruz; Sue Cobb; Lorenzo Picinali; Emily Frost; Stefano Tamascelli; Harshada Patel
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2021-07-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.