Literature DB >> 10981601

Optimal outcome measures, research priorities, and international cooperation.

R Cox1, M Hyde, S Gatehouse, W Noble, H Dillon, R Bentler, D Stephens, S Arlinger, L Beck, D Wilkerson, S Kramer, P Kricos, J P Gagné, F Bess, L Hallberg.   

Abstract

The participants in the Eriksholm Workshop on "Measuring Outcomes in Audiological Rehabilitation Using Hearing Aids" debated three issues that are reported in this article. First, it was agreed that the characteristics of an optimal outcome measure vary as a function of the purpose of the measurement. Potential characteristics of outcome self-report tools for four common goals of outcome measurement are briefly presented to illustrate this point. Second, 10 important research priorities in outcome measurement were identified and ranked. They are presented with brief discussion of the top five. Third, the concept of generating a brief universally applicable outcome measure was endorsed. This brief data set is intended to supplement existing outcome measures and to promote data combination and comparison across different social, cultural, and health-care delivery systems. A set of seven core items is proposed for further study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10981601     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200008001-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  46 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for Best Practice in the Audiological Management of Adults with Severe and Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Laura Turton; Pamela Souza; Linda Thibodeau; Louise Hickson; René Gifford; Judith Bird; Maren Stropahl; Lorraine Gailey; Bernadette Fulton; Nerina Scarinci; Katie Ekberg; Barbra Timmer
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2020-12-16

2.  Preference for one or two hearing AIDS among adult patients.

Authors:  Robyn M Cox; Kathryn S Schwartz; Colleen M Noe; Genevieve C Alexander
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 3.  Effects of age on auditory and cognitive processing: implications for hearing aid fitting and audiologic rehabilitation.

Authors:  M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller; Gurjit Singh
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2006-03

4.  Timing and Impact of Hearing Healthcare in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients: A Rural-Urban Comparison.

Authors:  Brian Hixon; Stephen Chan; Margaret Adkins; Jennifer B Shinn; Matthew L Bush
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Stuart Gatehouse: the international perspective.

Authors:  Dianne J Van Tasell; Harry Levitt
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06

6.  Tinnitus outcomes assessment.

Authors:  Mary B Meikle; Barbara J Stewart; Susan E Griest; James A Henry
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-07-03

7.  Self-report outcome measures for adult hearing aid services: some uses, users, and options.

Authors:  S Gatehouse
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2001-09

8.  Detecting components of hearing aid fitting using a self-assessment-inventory.

Authors:  Hartmut Meister; Isabel Lausberg; Juergen Kiessling; Hasso von Wedel; Martin Walger
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2004-12-09       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Assessment of Hearing Aid Benefit Using Patient-Reported Outcomes and Audiologic Measures.

Authors:  James R Dornhoffer; Ted A Meyer; Judy R Dubno; Theodore R McRackan
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 1.854

10.  Stuart Gatehouse: a brief life.

Authors:  Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2008-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.