Literature DB >> 11128900

Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research.

E M Andresen1.   

Abstract

To recommend instrument assessment criteria, deriving from psychometric textbooks and articles and disability and research experts, for reviewing and assessing surveys and questionnaires for disability outcomes research. Traditional criteria are recommended, including psychometric properties of validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change, as are newer statistical methods for assessing scaling properties, such as Rasch analysis. Special consideration is needed for generic instruments that may be poorly scaled for disability research. Pragmatic aspects of data collection, including acceptability and disability accommodation, also are recommended.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11128900     DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2000.20619

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  198 in total

1.  Proxy reliability: health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures for people with disability.

Authors:  E M Andresen; V J Vahle; D Lollar
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  The SIP68: an abbreviated sickness impact profile for disability outcomes research.

Authors:  Upasana Nanda; Patricia M McLendon; Elena M Andresen; Eric Armbrecht
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Measurement properties of performance-based assessment of functional capacity.

Authors:  Douglas P Gross
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2004-09

4.  Cross-cultural adaptation and assessment of the reliability and validity of the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) for the Brazilian-Portuguese language.

Authors:  L H F Damasceno; P A G Rocha; E S Barbosa; C A M Barros; F T Canto; H L A Defino; A F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Development of the computer-adaptive version of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument.

Authors:  Christine M McDonough; Feng Tian; Pengsheng Ni; Ilona M Kopits; Richard Moed; Poonam K Pardasaney; Alan M Jette
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 6.053

6.  Validity and reliability of the Chinese translation of the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE).

Authors:  Kristine Vaughan; William C Miller
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 3.033

7.  Reliability and validity of the telephone administration of the wheelchair outcome measure (WhOM) for middle-aged and older users of power mobility devices.

Authors:  Claudine Auger; Louise Demers; Isabelle Gélinas; François Routhier; W Ben Mortenson; William C Miller
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.912

Review 8.  A review of instruments assessing participation in persons with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  V K Noonan; W C Miller; L Noreau
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 2.772

9.  Interchangeability of the EQ-5D and the SF-6D, and comparison of their psychometric properties in a spinal postoperative Spanish population.

Authors:  Carmen Selva-Sevilla; Paula Ferrara; Manuel Gerónimo-Pardo
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2020-02-17

10.  Understanding Health-Related Quality of Life of Caregivers of Civilians and Service Members/Veterans With Traumatic Brain Injury: Establishing the Reliability and Validity of PROMIS Social Health Measures.

Authors:  Noelle E Carlozzi; Phillip A Ianni; Rael T Lange; Tracey A Brickell; Michael A Kallen; Elizabeth A Hahn; Louis M French; David Cella; Jennifer A Miner; David S Tulsky
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 3.966

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.