PURPOSE: To propose a quality assurance procedure for routine clinical diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) using the widely available American College of Radiology (ACR) head phantom. METHODS: Analysis was performed on the data acquired at 1.5 and 3.0 T on whole body clinical MRI scanners using the ACR phantom and included the following: (1) the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at the center and periphery of the phantom, (2) image distortion by EPI readout relative to spin echo imaging, (3) distortion of high-b images relative to the b= 0 image caused by diffusion encoding, and (4) determination of fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) measured with region-of-interest (ROI) and pixel-based approaches. Reproducibility of the measurements was assessed by five repetitions of data acquisition on each scanner. RESULTS: The SNR at the phantom center was approximately half of that near the periphery at both 1.5 and 3 T. The image distortion by the EPI readout was up to 7 mm at 1.5 T and 10 mm at 3 T. The typical distortion caused by eddy currents from diffusion encoding was on the order of 0.5 mm. The difference between ROI-based and pixel-based MD quantification was 1.4% at 1.5 T and 0.3% at 3 T. The ROI-based MD values were in close agreement (within 2%) with the reference values. The ROI-based FA values were approximately a factor of 10 smaller than pixel-based values and less than 0.01. The measurement reproducibility was sufficient for quality assurance (QA) purposes. CONCLUSIONS: This QA approach is simple to perform and evaluates key aspects of the scanner performance for DTI data acquisition using a widely available phantom.
PURPOSE: To propose a quality assurance procedure for routine clinical diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) using the widely available American College of Radiology (ACR) head phantom. METHODS: Analysis was performed on the data acquired at 1.5 and 3.0 T on whole body clinical MRI scanners using the ACR phantom and included the following: (1) the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at the center and periphery of the phantom, (2) image distortion by EPI readout relative to spin echo imaging, (3) distortion of high-b images relative to the b= 0 image caused by diffusion encoding, and (4) determination of fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) measured with region-of-interest (ROI) and pixel-based approaches. Reproducibility of the measurements was assessed by five repetitions of data acquisition on each scanner. RESULTS: The SNR at the phantom center was approximately half of that near the periphery at both 1.5 and 3 T. The image distortion by the EPI readout was up to 7 mm at 1.5 T and 10 mm at 3 T. The typical distortion caused by eddy currents from diffusion encoding was on the order of 0.5 mm. The difference between ROI-based and pixel-based MD quantification was 1.4% at 1.5 T and 0.3% at 3 T. The ROI-based MD values were in close agreement (within 2%) with the reference values. The ROI-based FA values were approximately a factor of 10 smaller than pixel-based values and less than 0.01. The measurement reproducibility was sufficient for quality assurance (QA) purposes. CONCLUSIONS: This QA approach is simple to perform and evaluates key aspects of the scanner performance for DTI data acquisition using a widely available phantom.
Authors: Seppo Mattila; Ville Renvall; Jaana Hiltunen; Douglas Kirven; Raimo Sepponen; Riitta Hari; Antti Tarkiainen Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Jonathan A D Farrell; Bennett A Landman; Craig K Jones; Seth A Smith; Jerry L Prince; Peter C M van Zijl; Susumu Mori Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Olaf Dietrich; José G Raya; Scott B Reeder; Michael Ingrisch; Maximilian F Reiser; Stefan O Schoenberg Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2008-04-28 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Peter Kochunov; Erin W Dickie; Joseph D Viviano; Jessica Turner; Peter B Kingsley; Neda Jahanshad; Paul M Thompson; Meghann C Ryan; Els Fieremans; Dmitry Novikov; Jelle Veraart; Elliot L Hong; Anil K Malhotra; Robert W Buchanan; Sofia Chavez; Aristotle N Voineskos Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2017-11-27 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Kurt G Schilling; Fang-Cheng Yeh; Vishwesh Nath; Colin Hansen; Owen Williams; Susan Resnick; Adam W Anderson; Bennett A Landman Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2019-01-22 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Sofia Chavez; Joseph Viviano; Mojdeh Zamyadi; Peter B Kingsley; Peter Kochunov; Stephen Strother; Aristotle Voineskos Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-10-17 Impact factor: 2.546