Literature DB >> 18440746

Influence of multichannel combination, parallel imaging and other reconstruction techniques on MRI noise characteristics.

Olaf Dietrich1, José G Raya, Scott B Reeder, Michael Ingrisch, Maximilian F Reiser, Stefan O Schoenberg.   

Abstract

The statistical properties of background noise such as its standard deviation and mean value are frequently used to estimate the original noise level of the acquired data. This requires the knowledge of the statistical intensity distribution of the background signal, that is, the probability density of the occurrence of a certain signal intensity. The influence of many new MRI techniques and, in particular, of various parallel-imaging methods on the noise statistics has neither been rigorously investigated nor experimentally demonstrated yet. In this study, the statistical distribution of background noise was analyzed for MR acquisitions with a single-channel and a 32-channel coil, with sum-of-squares (SoS) and spatial-matched-filter (SMF) data combination, with and without parallel imaging using k-space and image-domain algorithms, with real-part and conventional magnitude reconstruction and with several reconstruction filters. Depending on the imaging technique, the background noise could be described by a Rayleigh distribution, a noncentral chi-distribution or the positive half of a Gaussian distribution. In particular, the noise characteristics of SoS-reconstructed multichannel acquisitions (with k-space-based parallel imaging or without parallel imaging) differ substantially from those with image-domain parallel imaging or SMF combination. These effects must be taken into account if mean values or standard deviations of background noise are employed for data analysis such as determination of local noise levels. Assuming a Rayleigh distribution as in conventional MR images or a noncentral chi-distribution for all multichannel acquisitions is invalid in general and may lead to erroneous estimates of the signal-to-noise ratio or the contrast-to-noise ratio.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18440746     DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2008.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  74 in total

1.  Single image signal-to-noise ratio estimation for magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  K S Sim; M A Lai; C P Tso; C C Teo
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  High resolution navigated three-dimensional T₁-weighted hepatobiliary MRI using gadoxetic acid optimized for 1.5 Tesla.

Authors:  Scott K Nagle; Reed F Busse; Anja C Brau; Jean H Brittain; Alex Frydrychowicz; Yuji Iwadate; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-05-30       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Super-resolution reconstruction to increase the spatial resolution of diffusion weighted images from orthogonal anisotropic acquisitions.

Authors:  Benoit Scherrer; Ali Gholipour; Simon K Warfield
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  Arterial spin labeling at 3.0 Tesla in subacute ischemia: comparison to dynamic susceptibility perfusion.

Authors:  S Huck; H U Kerl; M Al-Zghloul; C Groden; I Nölte
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 3.649

5.  Late gadolinium MRI enhancement of colorectal liver metastases is associated with overall survival among nonsurgical patients.

Authors:  Helen M C Cheung; Jin K Kim; John Hudson; Natalie Coburn; Paul J Karanicolas; Calvin Law; Laurent Milot
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Optimized high-resolution contrast-enhanced hepatobiliary imaging at 3 tesla: a cross-over comparison of gadobenate dimeglumine and gadoxetic acid.

Authors:  Alex Frydrychowicz; Scott K Nagle; Sharon L D'Souza; Karl K Vigen; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 7.  Pitfalls in FMRI.

Authors:  Sven Haller; Andreas J Bartsch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Evaluation of statistical inference on empirical resting state fMRI.

Authors:  Xue Yang; Hakmook Kang; Allen T Newton; Bennett A Landman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  A majorize-minimize framework for Rician and non-central chi MR images.

Authors:  Divya Varadarajan; Justin P Haldar
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  A quality assurance protocol for diffusion tensor imaging using the head phantom from American College of Radiology.

Authors:  Zhiyue J Wang; Youngseob Seo; Jonathan M Chia; Nancy K Rollins
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.