Literature DB >> 23682306

Masking Vegetable Bitterness to Improve Palatability Depends on Vegetable Type and Taste Phenotype.

Mastaneh Sharafi1, John E Hayes2, Valerie B Duffy1.   

Abstract

Consumption of dark green vegetables falls short of recommendations, in part, because of unpleasant bitterness. A laboratory-based study of 37 adults was used to determine bitter and hedonic responses to vegetables (asparagus, Brussels sprouts, kale) with bitter masking agents (1.33 M sodium acetate, 10 and 32 mM n class="Chemical">sodium chloride, and 3.2 mM aspartame) and then characterized by taste phenotype and vegetable liking. In repeated-measures ANOVA, aspartame was most effective at suppressing bitterness and improving hedonic responses for all sampled vegetables. Among the sodium salts, 32 mM sodium chloride decreased bitterness for kale and sodium acetate reduced bitterness across all vegetables with a tendency to increase liking for Brussels sprouts, as release from mixture suppression increased perceived sweetness. Participants were nearly equally divided into three 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) phenotype groups. Those tasting the least PROP bitterness (non-tasters) reported least vegetable bitterness, and the additives produced little change in vegetable liking. Aspartame persisted as the most effective bitter blocker for the PROP tasters (medium, supertasters), improving vegetable liking for the medium tasters but too much sweetness for supertasters. The sodium salts showed some bitter blocking for PROP tasters, particularly sodium acetate, without significant gains in vegetable liking. Via a survey, adults characterized as low vegetable likers reported greater increase in vegetable liking with the maskers than did vegetable likers. These results suggest that bitter masking agents (mainly sweeteners) can suppress bitterness to increase acceptance if they are matched to perceived vegetable bitterness or to self-reported vegetable disliking.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bitter; Food preference; Genetics; Salt; Sweet; Taste; Vegetables

Year:  2013        PMID: 23682306      PMCID: PMC3652488          DOI: 10.1007/s12078-012-9137-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chemosens Percept        ISSN: 1936-5802            Impact factor:   1.833


  58 in total

1.  Bitter taste markers explain variability in vegetable sweetness, bitterness, and intake.

Authors:  M E Dinehart; J E Hayes; L M Bartoshuk; S L Lanier; V B Duffy
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2005-12-20

2.  Decreasing dislike for sour and bitter in children and adults.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Capaldi; Gregory J Privitera
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 3.868

3.  Fruit and vegetable intake correlates during the transition to young adulthood.

Authors:  Nicole I Larson; Dianne R Neumark-Sztainer; Lisa J Harnack; Melanie M Wall; Mary T Story; Marla E Eisenberg
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Rocket salad (Diplotaxis and Eruca spp.) sensory analysis and relation with glucosinolate and phenolic content.

Authors:  Federica Pasini; Vito Verardo; Lorenzo Cerretani; Maria Fiorenza Caboni; Luigi Filippo D'Antuono
Journal:  J Sci Food Agric       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.638

Review 5.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of school-based interventions to improve daily fruit and vegetable intake in children aged 5 to 12 y.

Authors:  Charlotte E L Evans; Meaghan S Christian; Christine L Cleghorn; Darren C Greenwood; Janet E Cade
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Explaining variability in sodium intake through oral sensory phenotype, salt sensation and liking.

Authors:  John E Hayes; Bridget S Sullivan; Valerie B Duffy
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2010-04-07

7.  Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: use of nutritive and nonnutritive sweeteners.

Authors:  Cindy Fitch; Kathryn S Keim
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 4.910

8.  Decaying behavioral effects in a randomized, multi-year fruit and vegetable intake intervention.

Authors:  Jessica A Hoffman; Douglas R Thompson; Debra L Franko; Thomas J Power; Stephen S Leff; Virginia A Stallings
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Sensory characterization of the irritant properties of oleocanthal, a natural anti-inflammatory agent in extra virgin olive oils.

Authors:  Sara Cicerale; Paul A S Breslin; Gary K Beauchamp; Russell S J Keast
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2009-03-08       Impact factor: 3.160

10.  The perceived bitterness of beer and 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) taste sensitivity.

Authors:  L R Intranuovo; A S Powers
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1998-11-30       Impact factor: 5.691

View more
  17 in total

1.  Bitter taste phenotype and body weight predict children's selection of sweet and savory foods at a palatable test-meal.

Authors:  Kathleen L Keller; Annemarie Olsen; Terri L Cravener; Rachel Bloom; Wendy K Chung; Liyong Deng; Patricia Lanzano; Karol Meyermann
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 3.868

2.  Sodium, but not potassium, blocks bitterness in simple model chicken broths.

Authors:  Paul M Wise; Shashwat Damani; Paul A S Breslin
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 2.701

3.  E-cigarette palatability in smokers as a function of flavorings, nicotine content and propylthiouracil (PROP) taster phenotype.

Authors:  Erin L Mead; Valerie Duffy; Cheryl Oncken; Mark D Litt
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 3.913

4.  Comparing the portion size effect in women with and without extended training in portion control: A follow-up to the Portion-Control Strategies Trial.

Authors:  Faris M Zuraikat; Liane S Roe; Christine E Sanchez; Barbara J Rolls
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 3.868

5.  Adolescents perceive a low added sugar adequate fiber diet to be more satiating and equally palatable compared to a high added sugar low fiber diet in a randomized-crossover design controlled feeding pilot trial.

Authors:  Tanya M Halliday; Sarah V Liu; Lori B Moore; Valisa E Hedrick; Brenda M Davy
Journal:  Eat Behav       Date:  2018-05-05

Review 6.  The development of sweet taste: From biology to hedonics.

Authors:  Julie A Mennella; Nuala K Bobowski; Danielle R Reed
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.514

7.  Characterizing and improving the sensory and hedonic responses to polyphenol-rich aronia berry juice.

Authors:  Valerie B Duffy; Shristi Rawal; Jeeha Park; Mark H Brand; Mastaneh Sharafi; Bradley W Bolling
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.868

8.  Behavioral measures of risk tasking, sensation seeking and sensitivity to reward may reflect different motivations for spicy food liking and consumption.

Authors:  Nadia K Byrnes; John E Hayes
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 9.  Vegetable and Fruit Acceptance during Infancy: Impact of Ontogeny, Genetics, and Early Experiences.

Authors:  Julie A Mennella; Ashley R Reiter; Loran M Daniels
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 8.701

10.  Dietary behaviors of adults born prematurely may explain future risk for cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Mastaneh Sharafi; Valerie B Duffy; Robin J Miller; Suzy B Winchester; Tania B Huedo-Medina; Mary C Sullivan
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 3.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.