Literature DB >> 17873817

Adult spinal deformity surgery: complications and outcomes in patients over age 60.

Michael D Daubs1, Lawrence G Lenke, Gene Cheh, Georgia Stobbs, Keith H Bridwell.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective analysis, including prospectively collected patient outcomes data.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of complications and outcomes in patients >or=60 years of age who underwent major spinal deformity surgery requiring a minimum 5-level arthrodesis procedure. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: As the population ages, an increasing number of older patients are presenting with spinal deformity disorders that may require major reconstructive procedures. Previous studies have reported complication rates as high as 80% in this age group for 1- and 2-level fusion procedures. The prevalence of complications was found to increase with the greater number of levels fused.
METHODS: Forty-six patients who were 60 years of age or older underwent a thoracic or lumbar arthrodesis procedure consisting of 5 levels or greater. Diagnosis, comorbidities, operative data, hospital data, major and minor complications, and deaths were recorded. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Scores were used to evaluate clinical outcomes.
RESULTS: Thirty-eight females and 8 males with a mean age of 67 years (range, 60-85 years) and a mean follow-up of 4.2 years (range, 2-11 years) had complete records. Thirty-six (78%) patients had at least 1 comorbidity. Twenty-nine (63%) patients had at least 1 prior spinal surgery. A mean of 9 levels (range, 5-16 levels) were fused in each patient. The overall complication rate was 37%. The major complication rate was 20%. ODI improved from 49 to 25 for a mean improvement of 24 (49%) (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION: The overall complication rate was 37% and the major complication rate was 20%. Increasing age was a significant factor (P < 0.05) in predicting the presence of a complication. Patients older than 69 years had more complications. The presence of a comorbidity had no association with complication rates and neither had an effect on final patient reported outcomes, which showed significant improvement (ODI preoperative, 49; postoperative, 25) (P < 0.0001).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17873817     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31814cf24a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  108 in total

Review 1.  Paradigm changes in spine surgery: evolution of minimally invasive techniques.

Authors:  Zachary A Smith; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 42.937

2.  Spinal surgery in patients with Parkinson's disease: experiences with the challenges posed by sagittal imbalance and the Parkinson's spine.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Frank Acosta; Juliane Zenner; Luis Ferraris; Wolfgang Hitzl; Oliver Meier; Steven Ondra; Tyler Koski; Rene Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The surgical vascular anatomy of the minimally invasive lateral lumbar interbody approach: a cadaveric and radiographic analysis.

Authors:  Mustafa Alkadhim; Carmine Zoccali; Salman Abbasifard; Mauricio J Avila; Apar S Patel; Kamran Sattarov; Christina M Walter; Ali A Baaj
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  A decision analysis to identify the ideal treatment for adult spinal deformity: is surgery better than non-surgical treatment in improving health-related quality of life and decreasing the disease burden?

Authors:  Emre Acaroglu; Aysun Cetinyurek Yavuz; Umit Ozgur Guler; Selcen Yuksel; Yasemin Yavuz; Montse Domingo-Sabat; Ferran Pellise; Ahmet Alanay; Francesco Sanchez Perez Grueso; Frank Kleinstück; Ibrahim Obeid
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Is the lateral transpsoas approach feasible for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis?

Authors:  Carlos Castro; Leonardo Oliveira; Rodrigo Amaral; Luis Marchi; Luiz Pimenta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 6.  [Spinal surgery in the elderly: does age have an influence on the complication rate?].

Authors:  R Sobottke; G Csécsei; T Kaulhausen; S Delank; J Franklin; E Aghayev; T Zweig; P Eysel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 7.  Spinal pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance patients.

Authors:  Seung-Jae Hyun; Yongjung J Kim; Seung-Chul Rhim
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2013-11-16       Impact factor: 1.337

8.  Risk factors for positioning-related somatosensory evoked potential changes in 3946 spinal surgeries.

Authors:  Samyuktha R Melachuri; Jeffrey R Balzer; Manasa K Melachuri; David Ninaci; Katherine Anetakis; Jaspreet Kaur; Donald J Crammond; Parthasarathy D Thirumala
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.502

9.  Predictors of inpatient morbidity and mortality in adult spinal deformity surgery.

Authors:  Nancy Worley; Bryan Marascalchi; Cyrus M Jalai; Sun Yang; Bassel Diebo; Shaleen Vira; Anthony Boniello; Virginie Lafage; Peter G Passias
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Factors influencing radiographic and clinical outcomes in adult scoliosis surgery: a study of 448 European patients.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Conny Pfanz; Oliver Meier; Wolfgang Hitzl; Michael Mayer; Viola Bullmann; Tobias L Schulte
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.