Literature DB >> 34551920

Simplified Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures.

Nicolas Plais1, Charles Mengis2, Jesús Manuel Gallego Bustos2, Felix Tomé-Bermejo3, Alejandro Peiro-Garcia4, America Novoa Buitrago1, Luis Alvarez-Galovich2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVF) involving neurological symptoms and severe kyphosis, vertebral osteotomies are necessary but are associated with a high risk of complications.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective study. In 14 patients (mean age, 69.3 years old) with unstable thoracolumbar fractures associated with severe kyphosis, a posterior instrumentation with polymethylmethacrylate-augmented screws and a modified pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) at the fracture level were performed to stabilize the spine and correct the kyphosis. The underlying principle behind the osteotomy's technique was to exaggerate the defect caused by the fracture and shorten the spine: (1) completion of a wide laminoforaminotomy, (2) use of successive reamers rotated in the pedicle at a 25° angle in the axial plane to obtain its complete decancellation, (3) insertion of the reamers in a more medial orientation (55°) to collapse the posterior wall, and (4) breakage of the lateral wall. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were analyzed pre- and postoperatively. Complications were reported.
RESULTS: Functional scores improved after surgery. Oswestry disability index and visual analog scale scores decreased significantly (33 and 4 points, respectively). Patient satisfaction rate reached 93%. Average postoperative regional vertebral kyphosis was decreased to 3.79°. No dural tear or neurological injuries were observed. Blood loss of 920 mL (±350 mL) and two mechanical complications were reported.
CONCLUSIONS: OVF can lead to severe deformities. In osteoporotic bones, the use of sequential reamers can simplify the PSO technique, allowing for the shortening and stabilization of the spine without manipulating the dural sac. The risk of neurological injuries and blood loss is decreased. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery.
Copyright © 2021 ISASS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complications; decancellation technique; kyphosis; osteoporosis; osteoporotic vertebral fractures; pedicle subtraction osteotomy; spinal instability; spine trauma

Year:  2021        PMID: 34551920      PMCID: PMC8651195          DOI: 10.14444/8129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2211-4599


  38 in total

1.  Leakage of cement in percutaneous transpedicular vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic compression fractures.

Authors:  J S Yeom; W J Kim; W S Choy; C K Lee; B S Chang; J W Kang
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-01

2.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty: functional improvement in patients with osteoporotic compression fractures.

Authors:  Luis Alvarez; María Alcaraz; Antonio Pérez-Higueras; Juan J Granizo; Ignacio de Miguel; Roberto E Rossi; Diana Quiñones
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 3.  Osteoporotic vertebral body fractures of the thoracolumbar spine: indications and techniques of a 360°-stabilization.

Authors:  Ulrich Spiegl; J-S Jarvers; C-E Heyde; C Josten
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 4.  Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Fractures-How Are They Different?-Classification and Treatment Algorithm.

Authors:  Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran; Rishi M Kanna; Klaus J Schnake; Alexander R Vaccaro; Gregory D Schroeder; Said Sadiqi; Cumhur Oner
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.512

5.  Instrumented lumbar arthrodesis in elderly patients: prospective study using cannulated cemented pedicle screw instrumentation.

Authors:  Angel R Piñera; Camen Duran; Belen Lopez; Isabel Saez; Emmanuel Correia; Luis Alvarez
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Potential risks of using cement-augmented screws for spinal fusion in patients with low bone quality.

Authors:  M Martín-Fernández; A López-Herradón; A R Piñera; F Tomé-Bermejo; J M Duart; M D Vlad; M G Rodríguez-Arguisjuela; L Alvarez-Galovich
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Classification of vertebral compression fractures in the osteoporotic spine.

Authors:  Makoto Sugita; Nobuyoshi Watanabe; Yasuo Mikami; Hitoshi Hase; Toshikazu Kubo
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2005-08

8.  Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance.

Authors:  Scott L Parker; Stephen K Mendenhall; David N Shau; Owoicho Adogwa; William N Anderson; Clinton J Devin; Matthew J McGirt
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2012-02-10

9.  Different minimally important clinical difference (MCID) scores lead to different clinical prediction rules for the Oswestry disability index for the same sample of patients.

Authors:  Julie Schwind; Kenneth Learman; Bryan O'Halloran; Christopher Showalter; Chad Cook
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2013-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.