Literature DB >> 8222439

Effect of screw diameter, insertion technique, and bone cement augmentation of pedicular screw fixation strength.

R H Wittenberg1, K S Lee, M Shea, A A White, W C Hayes.   

Abstract

This study investigated (1) the effect of screw diameter and insertion technique in lumbar vertebrae, and insertion site in the sacrum, on the axial pullout force and transverse bending stiffness of pedicle screws, and (2) the effect of bone cement augmentation using polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) and the biodegradable composite, poly(propylene glycol-fumarate) on axial pullout force and transverse bending stiffness of pedicle screws inserted into lumbar vertebrae. The axial pullout force and transverse bending stiffness of a 6.25-mm Steffee screw and a 6-mm Kluger screw did not differ significantly in vertebral bodies of similar equivalent bone mineral density. The axial pullout force of Schanz screws was significantly increased with a 1-mm increase in screw diameter. However, there was no significant increase in transverse bending stiffness. In the sacrum, an approach through the S1 facet produced significantly higher axial pullout forces and transverse bending stiffness than the approach described by Harrington and Dickson. PMMA and a biodegradable composite bone cement poly(propylene glycol-fumarate) both increased the axial pullout force. PMMA also increased the transverse bending stiffness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8222439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  50 in total

1.  Factors affecting the interface of cervical spine facet screws placed in the technique by Roy-Camille et al.

Authors:  T R Pitzen; S Zenner; D Barbier; T Georg; W I Steudel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-03-27       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Biomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System® (TFAS®): loading as compared to a rigid posterior instrumentation system.

Authors:  Simon G Sjovold; Qingan Zhu; Anton Bowden; Chad R Larson; Peter M de Bakker; Marta L Villarraga; Jorge A Ochoa; David M Rosler; Peter A Cripton
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  [Pedicle screw augmentation from a biomechanical perspective].

Authors:  V Bullmann; U R Liljenqvist; R Rödl; T L Schulte
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Biomechanical evaluation of an expansive pedicle screw in calf vertebrae.

Authors:  Wei Lei; Zixiang Wu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-04-30       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  [Surgical anatomy of the lumbar spine].

Authors:  R E Willburger; J Krämer; M Wiese
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Unilateral augmented pedicle screw fixation for foraminal stenosis.

Authors:  Jeong-Gyun Kim; Yong-Jun Jin; Sang Ki Chung; Ki-Jeong Kim; Hyun-Jib Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-07-31

7.  Which salvage fixation technique is best for the failed initial screw fixation at the cervicothoracic junction? A biomechanical comparison study.

Authors:  Jae Taek Hong; Takigawa Tomoyuki; Ashish Jain; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Nozomu Inoue; Howard S An
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Analysis of bone cement distribution around fenestrated pedicle screws in low bone quality lumbosacral vertebrae.

Authors:  Sergio Gómez González; Gerard Cabestany Bastida; Maria Daniela Vlad; José López López; Pablo Buenestado Caballero; Luis Alvarez-Galovich; Maria Rodríguez-Arguisjuela; Enrique Fernández Aguado
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  [Operative treatment of traumatic fractures of the thorax and lumbar spine. Part II: surgical treatment and radiological findings].

Authors:  M Reinhold; C Knop; R Beisse; L Audigé; F Kandziora; A Pizanis; R Pranzl; E Gercek; M Schultheiss; A Weckbach; V Bühren; M Blauth
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Serious complication of cement augmentation for damaged pilot hole.

Authors:  Moon Young Jung; Dong Ah Shin; In Bo Hahn; Tae Gon Kim; Ryoong Huh; Sang Sup Chung
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.