Literature DB >> 21830141

The reliance on visual feedback control by older adults is highlighted in tasks requiring precise endpoint placement and precision grip.

Rachel O Coats1, John P Wann.   

Abstract

There is an ongoing debate as to whether a greater degree of sensory-motor control is required to maintain skills as humans progress to be septuagenarians. Here, we investigate the dependence of older participants upon vision to execute skilled prehension movements. In a first experiment, participants were required to place a small, round peg in one of three randomly cued holes. A mirror apparatus was used to create conditions where they could always see the target locations, but vision of their hand approaching the target could be removed, and we explored end position accuracy. In a second experiment, we examined the ability of participants to precisely control their grasp action under conditions where they could see the objects but not their hands completing the action. The results showed that in Experiment 1, the older adults undershot the target in their primary submovement and hence had to move further in their secondary movement to achieve their goal. In Experiment 2, the older adults spent longer in the final adjustment phase (a near zero velocity phase at the end of the reach) when vision of the hand was unavailable. These findings suggest that older adults are indeed more reliant on visual feedback than the young in tasks that require precise manual control, and this clarifies conflicting accounts in the prior literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21830141     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2813-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  12 in total

Review 1.  A century later: Woodworth's (1899) two-component model of goal-directed aiming.

Authors:  D Elliott; W F Helsen; R Chua
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Aging and the detection of observer and moving object collisions.

Authors:  George J Andersen; AnnJudel Enriquez
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2006-03

3.  Aging and the visual, haptic, and cross-modal perception of natural object shape.

Authors:  J Farley Norman; Charles E Crabtree; Hideko F Norman; Brandon K Moncrief; Molly Herrmann; Noah Kapley
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Age-related differences in prehension: the influence of task goals.

Authors:  P L Weir; B J Mallat; J L Leavitt; E A Roy; J R Macdonald
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.328

5.  Stereopsis and aging.

Authors:  J Farley Norman; Hideko F Norman; Amy E Craft; Crystal L Walton; Ashley N Bartholomew; Cory L Burton; Elizabeth Y Wiesemann; Charles E Crabtree
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Prehension with trunk assisted reaching.

Authors:  M Saling; G E Stelmach; S Mescheriakov; M Berger
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Persistence in visual feedback control by the elderly.

Authors:  R D Seidler-Dobrin; G E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Optical flow, spatial orientation, and the control of posture in the elderly.

Authors:  M G Wade; R Lindquist; J R Taylor; D Treat-Jacobson
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.077

9.  Rapid aimed limb movements: age differences and practice effects in component submovements.

Authors:  J Pratt; A L Chasteen; R A Abrams
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1994-06

10.  The role of sight of the hand in the development of prehension in childhood.

Authors:  Mary M Smyth; Kirsty A Peacock; Janet Katamba
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2004-02
View more
  12 in total

1.  Factors underlying age-related changes in discrete aiming.

Authors:  Florian Van Halewyck; Ann Lavrysen; Oron Levin; Matthieu P Boisgontier; Digby Elliott; Werner F Helsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Manual aiming in healthy aging: does proprioceptive acuity make the difference?

Authors:  Werner F Helsen; Florian Van Halewyck; Oron Levin; Matthieu P Boisgontier; Ann Lavrysen; Digby Elliott
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2016-04-04

3.  Age-related differentiation of sensorimotor control strategies during pursuit and compensatory tracking.

Authors:  Megan Heenan; Robert A Scheidt; Scott A Beardsley
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2014

4.  To throw or to place: does onward intention affect how a child reaches for an object?

Authors:  Kate Wilmut; Maia Byrne; Anna L Barnett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-03-02       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Eye and hand movement strategies in older adults during a complex reaching task.

Authors:  Rachel O Coats; Aaron J Fath; Sarah L Astill; John P Wann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Mental images across the adult lifespan: a behavioural and fMRI investigation of motor execution and motor imagery.

Authors:  L Zapparoli; P Invernizzi; M Gandola; M Verardi; M Berlingeri; M Sberna; A De Santis; A Zerbi; G Banfi; G Bottini; E Paulesu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-25       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Bimanual reach to grasp movements after cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Laura Britten; Rachel Coats; Ronaldo Ichiyama; Wajid Raza; Firas Jamil; Sarah Astill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The effect of task symmetry on bimanual reach-to-grasp movements after cervical spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Laura Britten; R O Coats; R M Ichiyama; W Raza; F Jamil; S L Astill
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Reaching a better understanding of the control of bimanual movements in older adults.

Authors:  Rachel O Coats; John P Wann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The effects of ageing and visual field loss on pointing to visual targets.

Authors:  Nikki J Rubinstein; Andrew J Anderson; Anna Ma-Wyatt; Mark J Walland; Allison M McKendrick
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.