Literature DB >> 20037022

Age-related differences in prehension: the influence of task goals.

P L Weir1, B J Mallat, J L Leavitt, E A Roy, J R Macdonald.   

Abstract

A single study is reported in which the influence of age and task goal on reaching and grasping movements were examined. Ten young and 10 elderly subjects reached and grasped a disk (4.5-cm diameter) and then either (a) placed it in a well, (b) placed It in a box, or (c) threw it in a box, all located 30 cm to the left of the disk. The reach-to-grasp movements were analyzed over two phases: the approach to capture the disk and the transporting of the disk. Differential effects were observed over the two phases as a function of age. Over the approach, the movement times of the elderly subjects were comparable with those of the young subjects, but their relative deceleration and hand enclosing times took longer. During object transport, however, the elderly subjects moved more slowly than the young subjects did, but there were no differences in relative timing. In both phases, the precision required of the task influenced the duration of movement and the relative timing of arm deceleration, suggesting that subjects accurately anticipated the demands of the task. Those results, which are discussed in relation to hardware and software limitations on performance, suggest that the age-related differences reflect changes in the use of software strategies over the two phases of movement.

Year:  1998        PMID: 20037022     DOI: 10.1080/00222899809601324

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  7 in total

1.  Movement planning reflects skill level and age changes in toddlers.

Authors:  Yu-ping Chen; Rachel Keen; Kerstin Rosander; Claes von Hofsten
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec

2.  The reliance on visual feedback control by older adults is highlighted in tasks requiring precise endpoint placement and precision grip.

Authors:  Rachel O Coats; John P Wann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Practice improves motor control in older adults by increasing the motor unit modulation from 13 to 30 Hz.

Authors:  Tanya Onushko; Harsimran S Baweja; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Tailoring reach-to-grasp to intended action: the role of motor practice.

Authors:  Kate Wilmut; Anna L Barnett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Trunk recruitment during spoon use in tetraparetic cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Dominique van Roon; Bert Steenbergen; Ruud G J Meulenbroek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-20       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Eye and hand movement strategies in older adults during a complex reaching task.

Authors:  Rachel O Coats; Aaron J Fath; Sarah L Astill; John P Wann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Reaching while walking: reaching distance costs more than walking distance.

Authors:  David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-12
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.