Literature DB >> 14742177

The role of sight of the hand in the development of prehension in childhood.

Mary M Smyth1, Kirsty A Peacock, Janet Katamba.   

Abstract

In two studies, children between 5 and 10 years of age were asked to reach to grasp an object without sight of the hand during the movement. The oldest children and adults were faster when they could see the hand and increased maximum grip aperture when they could not see the hand. The 10-year-olds were less able to integrate grasp and lift than adults when they could see their hands. Children aged 5 and 6 showed no increase in movement time when they could not see the hand and did not adapt maximum grip aperture to lack of sight. These effects remained when children were encouraged to reach for and lift the target as quickly as possible. The results indicate that younger children did not give preference to vision in the control of prehension, while older children used visual feedback to improve efficiency. Dependence on sight of the hand for the control of prehension does not simply decrease with age, but it may be integrated into an anticipatory control strategy where it contributes to the efficiency of control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14742177     DOI: 10.1080/02724980343000215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  11 in total

1.  Compensatory motor control after stroke: an alternative joint strategy for object-dependent shaping of hand posture.

Authors:  Preeti Raghavan; Marco Santello; Andrew M Gordon; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  The reliance on visual feedback control by older adults is highlighted in tasks requiring precise endpoint placement and precision grip.

Authors:  Rachel O Coats; John P Wann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Grasping with the left and right hand: a kinematic study.

Authors:  Alexandra Grosskopf; Johann P Kuhtz-Buschbeck
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Grasping future events: explicit knowledge of the availability of visual feedback fails to reliably influence prehension.

Authors:  Robert L Whitwell; Lisa M Lambert; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Eye-hand coordination skills in children with and without amblyopia.

Authors:  Catherine M Suttle; Dean R Melmoth; Alison L Finlay; John J Sloper; Simon Grant
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Auditory and visual information do not affect self-paced bilateral finger tapping in children with DCD.

Authors:  Renuka Roche; Anna Maria Wilms-Floet; Jane E Clark; Jill Whitall
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 2.161

7.  Age- and stereovision-dependent eye-hand coordination deficits in children with amblyopia and abnormal binocularity.

Authors:  Simon Grant; Catherine Suttle; Dean R Melmoth; Miriam L Conway; John J Sloper
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  The effect of removing visual information on reach control in young children.

Authors:  Erin Babinsky; Oliver Braddick; Janette Atkinson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-08-26       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Evaluation of the Leap Motion Controller during the performance of visually-guided upper limb movements.

Authors:  Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo; David Gonzalez; Mina Nouredanesh; James Tung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Bodily illusions in young children: developmental change in visual and proprioceptive contributions to perceived hand position.

Authors:  Andrew J Bremner; Elisabeth L Hill; Michelle Pratt; Silvia Rigato; Charles Spence
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.