Literature DB >> 18771680

Stereopsis and aging.

J Farley Norman1, Hideko F Norman, Amy E Craft, Crystal L Walton, Ashley N Bartholomew, Cory L Burton, Elizabeth Y Wiesemann, Charles E Crabtree.   

Abstract

Three experiments investigated whether and to what extent increases in age affect the functionality of stereopsis. The observers' ages ranged from 18 to 83 years. The overall goal was to challenge the older stereoscopic visual system by utilizing high magnitudes of binocular disparity, ambiguous binocular disparity [cf., Julesz, B., & Chang, J. (1976). Interaction between pools of binocular disparity detectors tuned to different disparities. Biological Cybernetics, 22, 107-119], and by making binocular matching more difficult. In particular, Experiment 1 evaluated observers' abilities to discriminate ordinal depth differences away from the horopter using standing disparities of 6.5-46 min arc. Experiment 2 assessed observers' abilities to discriminate stereoscopic shape using line-element stereograms. The direction (crossed vs. uncrossed) and magnitude of the binocular disparity (13.7 and 51.5 min arc) were manipulated. Binocular matching was made more difficult by varying the orientations of corresponding line elements across the two eyes' views. The purpose of Experiment 3 was to determine whether the aging stereoscopic system can resolve ambiguous binocular disparities in a manner similar to that of younger observers. The results of all experiments demonstrated that older observers' stereoscopic vision is functionally comparable to that of younger observers in many respects. For example, both age groups exhibited a similar ability to discriminate depth and surface shape. The results also showed, however, that age-related differences in stereopsis do exist, and they become most noticeable when the older stereoscopic system is challenged by multiple simultaneous factors.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18771680     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.08.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  15 in total

1.  The reliance on visual feedback control by older adults is highlighted in tasks requiring precise endpoint placement and precision grip.

Authors:  Rachel O Coats; John P Wann
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The effects of age and workload on 3D spatial attention in dual-task driving.

Authors:  Russell S Pierce; George J Andersen
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2014-02-16

3.  Residual stereopsis in age-related macular degeneration patients and its impact on vision-related abilities: a pilot study.

Authors:  Kathy Y Cao; Samuel N Markowitz
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2014-01-24

4.  Age-related changes in processing faces from detection to identification: ERP evidence.

Authors:  Sharon Daniel; Shlomo Bentin
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 4.673

5.  Perceptual learning, aging, and improved visual performance in early stages of visual processing.

Authors:  George J Andersen; Rui Ni; Jeffrey D Bower; Takeo Watanabe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 6.  Aging and vision: changes in function and performance from optics to perception.

Authors:  George J Andersen
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-02-16

7.  Multisensory integration, aging, and the sound-induced flash illusion.

Authors:  Denton J DeLoss; Russell S Pierce; George J Andersen
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2013-08-26

8.  Aging and the haptic perception of 3D surface shape.

Authors:  J Farley Norman; Astrid M L Kappers; Amanda M Beers; A Kate Scott; Hideko F Norman; Jan J Koenderink
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Effects of horizontal acceleration on human visual acuity and stereopsis.

Authors:  Chi-Ting Horng; Yih-Shou Hsieh; Ming-Ling Tsai; Wei-Kang Chang; Tzu-Hung Yang; Chien-Han Yauan; Chih-Hung Wang; Wu-Hsien Kuo; Yi-Chang Wu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 10.  What is binocular disparity?

Authors:  Joseph S Lappin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-08-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.