Literature DB >> 27044301

Manual aiming in healthy aging: does proprioceptive acuity make the difference?

Werner F Helsen1, Florian Van Halewyck1, Oron Levin2, Matthieu P Boisgontier1, Ann Lavrysen1, Digby Elliott3,4.   

Abstract

The present study examines whether non-active older adults are more dependent on visual information when executing aiming movements and whether age-related declines in proprioception play a mediating role herein. Young (N = 40) and older adults (N = 38) were divided into physically active and non-active subgroups based on self-reported sports participation levels. In experiment 1, participants executed wrist-aiming movements with and without visual feedback. In experiment 2, passive proprioceptive acuity was assessed using wrist motion detection and position matching tests. Results showed similar aiming accuracy across age groups both with and without visual feedback, but older adults exhibited longer movement times, prolonged homing-in phase, and made more corrective submovements. Passive proprioceptive acuity was significantly affected by physical activity level and age, with participants in the active group scoring better than their non-active peers. However, these declines did not predict performance changes on the aiming task. Taken together, our observations suggest that decline in proprioceptive acuity did not predict performance changes on the aiming task and older adults were able to compensate for their decreased motion and position sense when allowed sufficient time. In line with these observations, we proposed that older adults are able to compensate for their decline in proprioception by increasing their reliance on predictive models.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aging; Aiming performance; Motor control; Physical activity; Proprioception; Visual feedback

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27044301      PMCID: PMC5005912          DOI: 10.1007/s11357-016-9908-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Age (Dordr)        ISSN: 0161-9152


  61 in total

1.  Is there a difference in hip joint position sense between young and older groups?

Authors:  Christine M Pickard; Patricia E Sullivan; Garry T Allison; Kevin P Singer
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.053

2.  Field evaluation of cycled coupled movements of hand and foot in older individuals.

Authors:  Laura Capranica; Antonio Tessitore; Berardo Olivieri; Carlo Minganti; Caterina Pesce
Journal:  Gerontology       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.140

3.  Eye-hand coordination asymmetries in manual aiming.

Authors:  A Lavrysen; D Elliott; M J Buekers; P Feys; W F Helsen
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.328

Review 4.  Age-related differences in attentional cost associated with postural dual tasks: increased recruitment of generic cognitive resources in older adults.

Authors:  Matthieu P Boisgontier; Iseult A M Beets; Jacques Duysens; Alice Nieuwboer; Ralf T Krampe; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 5.  Proprioceptive sensibility in the elderly: degeneration, functional consequences and plastic-adaptive processes.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; James P Coxon; Nicole Wenderoth; Annouchka Van Impe; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-08-26       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  Persistence in visual feedback control by the elderly.

Authors:  R D Seidler-Dobrin; G E Stelmach
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Factors underlying age-related changes in discrete aiming.

Authors:  Florian Van Halewyck; Ann Lavrysen; Oron Levin; Matthieu P Boisgontier; Digby Elliott; Werner F Helsen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Peripheral vision and perceptual asymmetries in young and older martial arts athletes and nonathletes.

Authors:  Mónica Muiños; Soledad Ballesteros
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Age-related kinematic differences as influenced by task difficulty, target size, and movement amplitude.

Authors:  Caroline J Ketcham; Rachael D Seidler; Arend W A Van Gemmert; George E Stelmach
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.077

10.  Humans use continuous visual feedback from the hand to control fast reaching movements.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Saunders; David C Knill
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-06       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  9 in total

1.  Lifestyle Matters: Effects of Habitual Physical Activity on Driving Skills in Older Age.

Authors:  Evrim Gökçe; Robert Stojan; Melanie Mack; Otmar Bock; Claudia Voelcker-Rehage
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-05-06

2.  Assessing kinesthetic proprioceptive function of the upper limb: a novel dynamic movement reproduction task using a robotic arm.

Authors:  Kristof Vandael; Tasha R Stanton; Ann Meulders
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Quantitative evaluation of age-related decline in control of preprogramed movement.

Authors:  Naoshi Shimoda; Jongho Lee; Mitsuhiko Kodama; Shinji Kakei; Yoshihisa Masakado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Age-Related Decline of Wrist Position Sense and its Relationship to Specific Physical Training.

Authors:  Ann Van de Winckel; Yu-Ting Tseng; Daniel Chantigian; Kaitlyn Lorant; Zinat Zarandi; Jeffrey Buchanan; Thomas A Zeffiro; Mia Larson; Becky Olson-Kellogg; Jürgen Konczak; Manda L Keller-Ross
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Motor errors lead to enhanced performance in older adults.

Authors:  S Levy-Tzedek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Physical Activity Predicts Performance in an Unpracticed Bimanual Coordination Task.

Authors:  Matthieu P Boisgontier; Leen Serbruyns; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-02-20

7.  Trajectory formation principles are the same after mild or moderate stroke.

Authors:  Denis Mottet; Liesjet Elisabeth Henriette van Dokkum; Jérôme Froger; Abdelkader Gouaïch; Isabelle Laffont
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Motor Planning of Vertical Arm Movements in Healthy Older Adults: Does Effort Minimization Persist With Aging?

Authors:  Gabriel Poirier; Charalambos Papaxanthis; France Mourey; Jeremie Gaveau
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 5.750

9.  Adaptation of reach action to a novel force-field is not predicted by acuity of dynamic proprioception in either older or younger adults.

Authors:  Nick M Kitchen; R Chris Miall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 1.972

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.