Literature DB >> 21806813

Post-production protein stability: trouble beyond the cell factory.

Esther Vazquez1, José Luis Corchero, Antonio Villaverde.   

Abstract

Being protein function a conformation-dependent issue, avoiding aggregation during production is a major challenge in biotechnological processes, what is often successfully addressed by convenient upstream, midstream or downstream approaches. Even when obtained in soluble forms, proteins tend to aggregate, especially if stored and manipulated at high concentrations, as is the case of protein drugs for human therapy. Post-production protein aggregation is then a major concern in the pharmaceutical industry, as protein stability, pharmacokinetics, bioavailability, immunogenicity and side effects are largely dependent on the extent of aggregates formation. Apart from acting at the formulation level, the recombinant nature of protein drugs allows intervening at upstream stages through protein engineering, to produce analogue protein versions with higher stability and enhanced therapeutic values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21806813      PMCID: PMC3162505          DOI: 10.1186/1475-2859-10-60

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Cell Fact        ISSN: 1475-2859            Impact factor:   5.328


Aggregation and associated conformational stress of cell factories (both prokaryotic and eukaryotic) are major concerns in recombinant protein production, resulting in low yields, unstable production and limited solubility and biological activity of the products [1-9]. Basic research on protein folding and the routine implementation of several analytical procedures such as circular dichroism, mass spectrometry and infrared spectroscopy (mostly incorporated from amyloid research) [4,10-16] have expanded our understanding of how polypeptide chains cross-interact and aggregate in vivo. In bacteria, probably the most studied cell factories, aggregation as inclusion bodies, a quite common event during production of heterologous polypeptides [17,18], is now observed as a complex physiological event in which cellular agents, including chaperones [6,19,20], proteases [21-23] and actin-like proteins [24] are coordinately acting [24,25] in the frame of the cell's protein quality control machinery [26-28]. Despite aggregation as inclusion bodies might represent a source of relatively pure proteins for further refolding or extraction [29-33], or unexpectedly, a new type of nano-microparticulate biomaterials for biotechnological and biomedical applications [34-39], the use of recombinant proteins for most of biotechnological and biomedical applications requires fully soluble protein versions. A particular issue in recombinant protein aggregation is the occurrence of soluble aggregates (less apparent that large aggregates), that are being progressively recognized in production processes. These soluble clusters adopt a spectrum of forms (mainly fibrilar, spherical or amorphous) [40,41] and might be the in vivo physiological precursors and structural components of bacterial inclusion bodies [24,42]. Very different approaches have been explored at upstream, midstream and downstream levels to minimize aggregation during recombinant protein production (Figure 1). Such strategies, eventhough being mostly a trial-and-error process, often result in significant improvements of protein solubility [43-46].
Figure 1

Tool boxes through which protein solubility can be enhanced at different stages of protein production and postproduction pipelines. Targets for improvement during in vivo administration are summarized in the red framed box, some of them being modulated by protein aggregation. Appropriate codon selection [82,83], using weak promoters or low copy number plasmids and protein engineering [84] are the most common upstream strategies (yellow box). Growth at sub-optimal temperatures [85,86], mild induction of gene expression, co-production of chaperones [87-89] or protein production in protease-deficient strains [90,91] or in mutants with altered redox properties [92] favor correct protein folding (orange box). Buffers and purification conditions should be optimized as per protein basis to prevent aggregation [93-97]. Alternatively, soluble protein species can be obtained by refolding inclusion body proteins [30-32] or by extracting functional proteins from inclusion bodies by mild procedures [29] (green box). Once purified, aggregation during storage or administration of protein drugs can be inhibited by appropriate excipient formulations or by chemical modification [50,60,62,98] (blue box). Also, the use of delivery systems, either through protein adsorption onto nanoparticles, nano and micro encapsulation or embedding in biocompatible materials stabilize proteins, expand their half-life in the body and permit a sustained release, resulting in enhanced bioavailability and reduced toxicity [63,64,99]. Upstream protein engineering strategies that enhance solubility during production can also affect aggregation and performance of protein drugs upon administration. Also, by this approach, novel functions that improve pharmacological performance of proteins can be gained without necessarily enhancing solubility (bottom, green framed box).

Tool boxes through which protein solubility can be enhanced at different stages of protein production and postproduction pipelines. Targets for improvement during in vivo administration are summarized in the red framed box, some of them being modulated by protein aggregation. Appropriate codon selection [82,83], using weak promoters or low copy number plasmids and protein engineering [84] are the most common upstream strategies (yellow box). Growth at sub-optimal temperatures [85,86], mild induction of gene expression, co-production of chaperones [87-89] or protein production in protease-deficient strains [90,91] or in mutants with altered redox properties [92] favor correct protein folding (orange box). Buffers and purification conditions should be optimized as per protein basis to prevent aggregation [93-97]. Alternatively, soluble protein species can be obtained by refolding inclusion body proteins [30-32] or by extracting functional proteins from inclusion bodies by mild procedures [29] (green box). Once purified, aggregation during storage or administration of protein drugs can be inhibited by appropriate excipient formulations or by chemical modification [50,60,62,98] (blue box). Also, the use of delivery systems, either through protein adsorption onto nanoparticles, nano and micro encapsulation or embedding in biocompatible materials stabilize proteins, expand their half-life in the body and permit a sustained release, resulting in enhanced bioavailability and reduced toxicity [63,64,99]. Upstream protein engineering strategies that enhance solubility during production can also affect aggregation and performance of protein drugs upon administration. Also, by this approach, novel functions that improve pharmacological performance of proteins can be gained without necessarily enhancing solubility (bottom, green framed box). Desirably, soluble versions of recombinant proteins should keep such soluble status in post-production stages, that is, during storage and use. This need is specially acute in the case of proteins intended for therapeutic uses [47,48]. Protein drugs are commonly administered parenterally [49], what makes protein aggregation in stocks or upon administration a main concern in the Pharma industry (see for instance, http://www.eahp.eu/content/download/25193/164355/.../CoverStory20-21.pdf.pd). The high concentration at which proteins drugs are stored and administered [50] specifically favors aggregation [51]. In this context, diverse analytical procedures have been developed and specifically adapted to the detection of therapeutic protein aggregation [52-54]. Importantly, aggregation does not only render drug inactivation during storage, and fast clearance, reduction of activity, limited bioavailability and proteolytic digestion upon administration, but it also stimulates undesired immunogenicity [55]. This is a critical issue in clinics as severe side effects observed upon prolonged protein administration (as in the case of insulins, interferons, erythropoietin and growth hormone) are antibody-dependent [56-59]. Chemical modification of proteins and the use of appropriate excipients (Figure 1) are the most taken approaches for protein drug stabilization [60-62]. Obviously, emerging concepts in Nanotechnology, Nanomedicine and in Material Sciences offer new biocompatible vehicles for protein encapsulation or embedding, mainly at the nanoscale, through which the stability, tissue targeting and bioavailability during drug delivery are dramatically enhanced [63,64]. Many among those such nanostructured materials are from bacterial origin [65]. Being proteins flexible molecules suitable to be re-designed by genetic methods, upstream protein engineering, one of the main approaches to prevent aggregation during production (Table 1, up), is also useful to stabilize protein drugs during use (Table 1, bottom). In addition, modification of the protein primary sequence permits a fine tuning of protein features such as oligomerization, activity, cell targeting and cell penetration, that represent additional values in the performance of a protein drug (Table 1; Figure 1, bottom). In this regard, protein engineering is revealed as an extremely flexible approach to enhance the stability of proteins during production, storage and use, but also to improve their performance in in vivo uses. Reduction of aggregation is expected to minimize immunogenicity, increase proteolytic stability, improve bioavailability and limit side-effects, as aggregation has a pivotal role in all these issues [55,59,66-69]. In addition, protein modification can offer added values to protein drugs, by conferring novel functions that improve pharmacological performance without necessarily enhancing solubility (Figure 1, green framed box). These include cell or tissue targeting or enhanced cell penetration by the fusion to a cell receptor ligand or an antibody [70-74], enhancing half-life and bioavailability by fusion to transferrin [75], albumin [76], or albumin-binding peptides [77] and crossing the brain-blood barrier (BBB) by the incorporation of cationic peptides [78]. Creating multifunctional proteins by the appropriate combination of protein domains in a single polypeptide chain is being especially explored for the construction of protein-only artificial viruses, in which the therapeutic nucleic acids are encapsulated by chimerical protein building blocks [72,79-81]. Further exploration of protein engineering focused on post-production issues is strongly required and it should allow the emergence of optimized drugs to fulfill their increasing demand.
Table 1

Protein engineering strategies to reduce aggregation or derived effects during either production or administration, illustrated by representative examples.

Protein engineering strategyResultProteinReference
Improving protein folding during production

Cys→Ser point mutationsReduced aggregation, enhanced proteolytic stabilitybFGFa[100]
Point mutations in an hydrophobic stretchReduced aggregation11 beta-HSD1[101]
Directed evolution/point mutationsReduced aggregationCytochrome P450sca-2[102]
Fusion of SUMO tagImproved refoldingFgf15[103]
Polycationic amino acid tag fusionReduced aggregationCandida antarctica lipase B[104]
Fusion to polylysines or polyargininesReduced aggregationBPTI-22[105]
Fusion to MBPReduced aggregationRibonuclease inhibitor[106]
Fusion to GrpEReduced aggregationhIL-3[107]
Fusion to NusAReduced aggregation, enhanced proteolytic stabilityE8R viral protein[108]
Improving protein folding, stability and performance during administration

Single amino acid substitutionInhibited oligomer formation; enhanced bioavailabilityInsulin Aspart ®[109]
Single amino acid substitutionImproved foldingINF-β-1b (Betaferon ®)[110]
N-terminal peptide deletionEnhanced stabilityKGF[111]
Fusion with albuminExtended half-lifeAlbinterferon α-2b[76]
Fusion with transferrinEnhanced gastrointestinal adsorptionhGH[75]
Artificial consensus protein sequenceEnhanced activityInterferon αcon-1 (Infergen ®)[112]
Fusion of a HIV Tat segmentEnhanced solubilityp53[113]
Fusion of a HIV Tat protein and ODDEnhanced stability and activity in hypoxic tumor cellsCasp-3[114]
Fusion of a HIV Tat protein and sequence modificationCell penetration and selective activation in HIV-infected cellsCasp-3[115]
Ligand incorporation (mainly antibody fragments)Enhanced stability and bioavailbilityIL-2[71]

a Abbreviations are: 11 beta-HSD1, 11 beta-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1; aFGF, acidic fibroblast growth factor; bFGF: Fgf15, Fibroblast growth factor 15; BPTI-22, Bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor variant 22; Casp-3, caspase 3; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; hFGF, Human basic fibroblast growth factor; BSA, bovine serum albumin; HAS, human serum albumin; hGH, human growth hormone; hIL-3, human interleukin-3; KGF, keratinocyte growth factor; IL, interleukin; MAGOH, Protein mago nashi homolog; MBP, maltose-binding protein; OOD, oxygen-dependent degradation domain of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha; rhDNase, recombinant human DNAse; SUMO, small ubiquitin-related modifier.

Protein engineering strategies to reduce aggregation or derived effects during either production or administration, illustrated by representative examples. a Abbreviations are: 11 beta-HSD1, 11 beta-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1; aFGF, acidic fibroblast growth factor; bFGF: Fgf15, Fibroblast growth factor 15; BPTI-22, Bovine pancreatic trypsin inhibitor variant 22; Casp-3, caspase 3; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; hFGF, Human basic fibroblast growth factor; BSA, bovine serum albumin; HAS, human serum albumin; hGH, human growth hormone; hIL-3, human interleukin-3; KGF, keratinocyte growth factor; IL, interleukin; MAGOH, Protein mago nashi homolog; MBP, maltose-binding protein; OOD, oxygen-dependent degradation domain of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha; rhDNase, recombinant human DNAse; SUMO, small ubiquitin-related modifier.

Conclusions

Stability and solubility of recombinant proteins is a critical issue at both production and post-production stages. For a biomedical use of proteins as pharmaceuticals, high solubility not only supports stability but it also enhances bioavailability and reduces immunogenicity and undesired toxic effects. Among other approaches to stabilize protein drugs, such as chemical modification, proper formulation and encapsulation, protein engineering is a very flexible route to improve protein folding during production and reduce aggregation during storage and in vivo. Furthermore, the modification of protein primary sequence permits to confer additional functional values, such as binding to serum albumin, binding to cell surface receptors and cell membrane (or BBB) crossing, thus improving biodistribution, expanding the half-life and enhancing the biological potential of the drug. The wide spectrum of possibilities of post-production-addressed protein engineering is probably to be yet realized.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
  112 in total

Review 1.  Nanostructured bacterial materials for innovative medicines.

Authors:  Escarlata Rodríguez-Carmona; Antonio Villaverde
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  2010-07-31       Impact factor: 17.079

2.  Recombinant protein solubility - does more mean better?

Authors:  Nuria González-Montalbán; Elena García-Fruitós; Antonio Villaverde
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 3.  Analytical approaches for assessing aggregation of protein biopharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Elena García-Fruitós; Esther Vazquez; Nuria Gonzalez-Montalbán; Neus Ferrer-Miralles; Antonio Villaverde
Journal:  Curr Pharm Biotechnol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.837

4.  Influence of growth temperature on the production of antibody Fab fragments in different microbes: a host comparative analysis.

Authors:  Martin Dragosits; Gianni Frascotti; Lise Bernard-Granger; Felícitas Vázquez; Maria Giuliani; Kristin Baumann; Escarlata Rodríguez-Carmona; Jaana Tokkanen; Ermenegilda Parrilli; Marilyn G Wiebe; Renate Kunert; Michael Maurer; Brigitte Gasser; Michael Sauer; Paola Branduardi; Tiina Pakula; Markku Saloheimo; Merja Penttilä; Pau Ferrer; Maria Luisa Tutino; Antonio Villaverde; Danilo Porro; Diethard Mattanovich
Journal:  Biotechnol Prog       Date:  2010-12-23

5.  High level soluble production of functional ribonuclease inhibitor in Escherichia coli by fusing it to soluble partners.

Authors:  Wanhua Guo; Lin Cao; Zhijun Jia; Gang Wu; Teng Li; Fengxia Lu; Zhaoxin Lu
Journal:  Protein Expr Purif       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 1.650

6.  Insulin aspart (B28 asp-insulin): a fast-acting analog of human insulin: absorption kinetics and action profile compared with regular human insulin in healthy nondiabetic subjects.

Authors:  S R Mudaliar; F A Lindberg; M Joyce; P Beerdsen; P Strange; A Lin; R R Henry
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 7.  Strategies for achieving high-level expression of genes in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  S C Makrides
Journal:  Microbiol Rev       Date:  1996-09

8.  Influence of production process design on inclusion bodies protein: the case of an Antarctic flavohemoglobin.

Authors:  Ermenegilda Parrilli; Maria Giuliani; Gennaro Marino; Maria Luisa Tutino
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 5.328

9.  Microbial factories for recombinant pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Neus Ferrer-Miralles; Joan Domingo-Espín; José Luis Corchero; Esther Vázquez; Antonio Villaverde
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 5.328

10.  Learning about protein solubility from bacterial inclusion bodies.

Authors:  Mónica Martínez-Alonso; Nuria González-Montalbán; Elena García-Fruitós; Antonio Villaverde
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 5.328

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  To fuse or not to fuse: what is your purpose?

Authors:  Mark R Bell; Mark J Engleka; Asim Malik; James E Strickler
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2013-09-17       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Aggregation and chemical modification of monoclonal antibodies under upstream processing conditions.

Authors:  Stefan Dengl; Marc Wehmer; Friederike Hesse; Florian Lipsmeier; Oliver Popp; Kurt Lang
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Overexpression and characterization of a novel GH16 β-agarase (Aga1) from Cellulophaga omnivescoria W5C.

Authors:  Kristine Rose M Ramos; Kris Niño G Valdehuesa; Angelo B Bañares; Grace M Nisola; Won-Keun Lee; Wook-Jin Chung
Journal:  Biotechnol Lett       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 2.461

4.  Biocatalytic potential of laccase-like multicopper oxidases from Aspergillus niger.

Authors:  Juan Antonio Tamayo-Ramos; Willem J H van Berkel; Leo H de Graaff
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 5.328

5.  The Aspergillus niger multicopper oxidase family: analysis and overexpression of laccase-like encoding genes.

Authors:  Juan A Tamayo Ramos; Sharief Barends; Raymond M D Verhaert; Leo H de Graaff
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 5.328

Review 6.  Innovative approach for improved rFVIII concentrate.

Authors:  Massimo Morfini
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 2.997

7.  Biophysical characterization of Met-G-CSF: effects of different site-specific mono-pegylations on protein stability and aggregation.

Authors:  Antonino Natalello; Diletta Ami; Maddalena Collini; Laura D'Alfonso; Giuseppe Chirico; Giancarlo Tonon; Silvia Scaramuzza; Rodolfo Schrepfer; Silvia Maria Doglia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Recombinant production of human interleukin 6 in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Henrik Nausch; Jana Huckauf; Roswitha Koslowski; Udo Meyer; Inge Broer; Heike Mikschofsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Intracellular CXCR4⁺ cell targeting with T22-empowered protein-only nanoparticles.

Authors:  Ugutz Unzueta; María Virtudes Céspedes; Neus Ferrer-Miralles; Isolda Casanova; Juan Cedano; José Luis Corchero; Joan Domingo-Espín; Antonio Villaverde; Ramón Mangues; Esther Vázquez
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2012-08-15

10.  Chemical glycosylation of cytochrome c improves physical and chemical protein stability.

Authors:  Yamixa Delgado; Moraima Morales-Cruz; José Hernández-Román; Yashira Martínez; Kai Griebenow
Journal:  BMC Biochem       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 4.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.