Literature DB >> 21805053

Detection accuracy of proximal caries by phosphor plate and cone-beam computerized tomography images scanned with different resolutions.

Jun-Ge Cheng1, Zhi-Ling Zhang, Xiao-Yan Wang, Zu-Yan Zhang, Xu-Chen Ma, Gang Li.   

Abstract

This study was carried out to assess whether the spatial resolution has an impact on the detection accuracy of proximal caries in flat panel CBCT (cone beam computerized tomography) images and if the detection accuracy can be improved by flat panel CBCT images scanned with high spatial resolution when compared to digital intraoral images. The CBCT test images of 45 non-restored human permanent teeth were respectively scanned with the ProMax 3D and the DCT Pro scanners at different resolutions. Digital images were obtained with a phosphor plate imaging system Digora Optime. Eight observers evaluated all the test images for carious lesion within the 90 proximal surfaces. With the histological examination serving as the reference standard, observer performances were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The areas under the ROC curves were analyzed with two-way analysis of variance. No significant differences were found among the CBCT images and between CBCT and digital images when only proximal enamel caries was detected (p = 0.989). With respect to the detection of proximal dentinal caries, significant difference was found between CBCT and digital images (p < 0.001) but not among CBCT images. The spatial resolution did not have an impact on the detection accuracy of proximal caries in flat panel CBCT images. The flat panel CBCT images scanned with high spatial resolution did not improve the detection accuracy of proximal enamel caries compared to digital intraoral images. CBCT images scanned with high spatial resolutions could not be used for proximal caries detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21805053     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-011-0599-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  19 in total

1.  Effective dose from radiation absorbed during a panoramic examination with a new generation machine.

Authors:  R A Danforth; D E Clark
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2000-02

2.  Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology.

Authors:  Nancy A Obuchowski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Statistical methods for comparing dental diagnostic procedures.

Authors:  C S Berkey; C W Douglass; R W Valachovic; H H Chauncey; B J McNeil
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.383

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography scans compared with intraoral image modalities for detection of caries lesions.

Authors:  F Haiter-Neto; A Wenzel; E Gotfredsen
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Influence of voxel size in the diagnostic ability of cone beam tomography to evaluate simulated external root resorption.

Authors:  Gabriela Salatino Liedke; Heloísa Emília Dias da Silveira; Heraldo Luis Dias da Silveira; Vinícius Dutra; José Antônio Poli de Figueiredo
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.171

6.  What is cone-beam CT and how does it work?

Authors:  William C Scarfe; Allan G Farman
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2008-10

Review 7.  Digital radiography and caries diagnosis.

Authors:  A Wenzel
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Effective radiation dose of ProMax 3D cone-beam computerized tomography scanner with different dental protocols.

Authors:  Xing-min Qu; Gang Li; John B Ludlow; Zu-yan Zhang; Xu-chen Ma
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2010-10-16

9.  Occlusal caries detection by using a cone-beam CT with different voxel resolutions and a digital intraoral sensor.

Authors:  Kivanç Kamburoğlu; Sema Murat; Selcen Pehlivan Yüksel; Ali Riza Ilker Cebeci; Candan Semra Paksoy
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2010-05

10.  Variable-resolution cone-beam computerized tomography with enhancement filtration compared with intraoral photostimulable phosphor radiography in detection of transverse root fractures in an in vitro model.

Authors:  Ann Wenzel; Fransisco Haiter-Neto; Morten Frydenberg; Lise-Lotte Kirkevang
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2009-10-28
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Impact of voxel size variation on CBCT-based diagnostic outcome in dentistry: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rubens Spin-Neto; Erik Gotfredsen; Ann Wenzel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Detecting Proximal Caries on Periapical Radiographs Using Convolutional Neural Networks with Different Training Strategies on Small Datasets.

Authors:  Xiujiao Lin; Dengwei Hong; Dong Zhang; Mingyi Huang; Hao Yu
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-21

3.  Detection accuracy of condylar bony defects in Promax 3D cone beam CT images scanned with different protocols.

Authors:  Z-L Zhang; J-G Cheng; G Li; X-Q Shi; J-Z Zhang; Z-Y Zhang; X-C Ma
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Comparison of CBCT with different voxel sizes and intraoral scanner for detection of periodontal defects: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Murat Icen; Kaan Orhan; Çiğdem Şeker; Gediz Geduk; Fethiye Cakmak Özlü; Murat İnanç Cengiz
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-03-10       Impact factor: 2.419

Review 5.  Radiographic modalities for diagnosis of caries in a historical perspective: from film to machine-intelligence supported systems.

Authors:  Ann Wenzel
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  Detection of root perforations using conventional and digital intraoral radiography, multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Abbas Shokri; Amir Eskandarloo; Maruf Noruzi-Gangachin; Samira Khajeh
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2014-11-13

7.  Diagnostic accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography, conventional and digital radiographs in detecting interproximal caries.

Authors:  Y Safi; N Shamloo Mahmoudi; M M Aghdasi; M Eslami Manouchehri; R Rahimian; S Valizadeh; Z Vasegh; Z Azizi
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2015

8.  A comparative study of the diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and intraoral radiographic modalities for the detection of noncavitated caries.

Authors:  J Krzyżostaniak; T Kulczyk; B Czarnecka; A Surdacka
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Comparison of Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional Radiographs Using Clinically Relevant Parameters.

Authors:  Julia C Schmidt; Claudia-Julie Gutekunst; Dorothea Dagassan-Berndt; Patrick R Schmidlin; Clemens Walter
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-01

10.  Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography scans with high- and low-resolution modes for the detection of root perforations.

Authors:  Abbas Shokri; Amir Eskandarloo; Marouf Norouzi; Jalal Poorolajal; Gelareh Majidi; Alireza Aliyaly
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2018-03-19
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.