Literature DB >> 23254628

Impact of voxel size variation on CBCT-based diagnostic outcome in dentistry: a systematic review.

Rubens Spin-Neto1, Erik Gotfredsen, Ann Wenzel.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to make a systematic review on the impact of voxel size in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based image acquisition, retrieving evidence regarding the diagnostic outcome of those images. The MEDLINE bibliographic database was searched from 1950 to June 2012 for reports comparing diverse CBCT voxel sizes. The search strategy was limited to English-language publications using the following combined terms in the search strategy: (voxel or FOV or field of view or resolution) and (CBCT or cone beam CT). The results from the review identified 20 publications that qualitatively or quantitatively assessed the influence of voxel size on CBCT-based diagnostic outcome, and in which the methodology/results comprised at least one of the expected parameters (image acquisition, reconstruction protocols, type of diagnostic task, and presence of a gold standard). The diagnostic task assessed in the studies was diverse, including the detection of root fractures, the detection of caries lesions, and accuracy of 3D surface reconstruction and of bony measurements, among others. From the studies assessed, it is clear that no general protocol can be yet defined for CBCT examination of specific diagnostic tasks in dentistry. Rationale in this direction is an important step to define the utility of CBCT imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23254628      PMCID: PMC3705012          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-012-9562-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  45 in total

Review 1.  Perfusion CT for the assessment of tumour vascularity: which protocol?

Authors:  K A Miles
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Accuracy of linear measurements and visibility of the mandibular canal of cone-beam computed tomography images with different voxel sizes: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Karen Borges Waltrick; Murillo José Nunes de Abreu Junior; Márcio Corrêa; Michella Dinah Zastrow; Vinícius D'Avila Dutra
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 6.993

3.  Influence of voxel size in the diagnostic ability of cone beam tomography to evaluate simulated external root resorption.

Authors:  Gabriela Salatino Liedke; Heloísa Emília Dias da Silveira; Heraldo Luis Dias da Silveira; Vinícius Dutra; José Antônio Poli de Figueiredo
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 4.171

4.  What is cone-beam CT and how does it work?

Authors:  William C Scarfe; Allan G Farman
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2008-10

5.  Influence of CBCT exposure conditions on radiation dose.

Authors:  J Martin Palomo; Pejavar S Rao; Mark G Hans
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2008-04-18

6.  Accuracy assessment of three-dimensional surface reconstructions of teeth from cone beam computed tomography scans.

Authors:  B Al-Rawi; B Hassan; B Vandenberge; R Jacobs
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 3.837

7.  Effect of voxel size on the accuracy of 3D reconstructions with cone beam CT.

Authors:  D Maret; N Telmon; O A Peters; B Lepage; J Treil; J M Inglèse; A Peyre; J L Kahn; M Sixou
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Working with DICOM craniofacial images.

Authors:  Dan Grauer; Lucia S H Cevidanes; William R Proffit
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.650

Review 9.  Multi-detector row CT of acute non-traumatic abdominal pain: contrast and protocol considerations.

Authors:  Stephan W Anderson; Jorge A Soto
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 2.303

10.  Variable-resolution cone-beam computerized tomography with enhancement filtration compared with intraoral photostimulable phosphor radiography in detection of transverse root fractures in an in vitro model.

Authors:  Ann Wenzel; Fransisco Haiter-Neto; Morten Frydenberg; Lise-Lotte Kirkevang
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2009-10-28
View more
  38 in total

1.  The effect of scan parameters on cone beam CT trabecular bone microstructural measurements of the human mandible.

Authors:  N Ibrahim; A Parsa; B Hassan; P van der Stelt; I H A Aartman; D Wismeijer
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Comparison of the influence of FOV sizes and different voxel resolutions for the assessment of periodontal defects.

Authors:  M E Kolsuz; N Bagis; K Orhan; H Avsever; K Ö Demiralp
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Evaluation of the effective dose of cone beam CT and multislice CT for temporomandibular joint examinations at optimized exposure levels.

Authors:  N Kadesjö; D Benchimol; B Falahat; K Näsström; X-Q Shi
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Effect of voxel size on detection of fenestration, dehiscence and furcation defects using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Masoumeh Eftekhar; Hanieh Kaviani; Nina Rouzmeh; Aitin Torabinia; Alireza Akbarzadeh Baghban
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 1.852

5.  Digital implant planning and guided implant surgery - workflow and reliability.

Authors:  O Schubert; J Schweiger; M Stimmelmayr; E Nold; J-F Güth
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 6.  Efficacy of CBCT for assessment of impacted mandibular third molars: a review - based on a hierarchical model of evidence.

Authors:  L H Matzen; A Wenzel
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Accuracy of CBCT images in the assessment of buccal marginal alveolar peri-implant defects: effect of field of view.

Authors:  K Kamburoğlu; S Murat; C Kılıç; S Yüksel; H Avsever; A Farman; W C Scarfe
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 2.419

8.  Comparison of the accuracy of periapical radiography with CBCT taken at 3 different voxel sizes in detecting simulated endodontic complications: an ex vivo study.

Authors:  Cemre Koç; Gül Sönmez; Funda Yılmaz; Sevilay Karahan; Kıvanç Kamburoğlu
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 2.419

9.  Comparison of different methods to assess alveolar cleft defects in cone beam CT images.

Authors:  Gabriella Lopes de Rezende Barbosa; Jeyhan S Wood; Luiz A Pimenta; Solange Maria de Almeida; Donald A Tyndall
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 2.419

10.  Cone beam computed tomography-based models versus multislice spiral computed tomography-based models for assessing condylar morphology.

Authors:  Liliane Rosas Gomes; Marcelo Regis Gomes; João Roberto Gonçalves; Antônio Carlos O Ruellas; Larry M Wolford; Beatriz Paniagua; Erika Benavides; Lúcia Helena Soares Cevidanes
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2015-10-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.