Literature DB >> 2201479

Statistical methods for comparing dental diagnostic procedures.

C S Berkey1, C W Douglass, R W Valachovic, H H Chauncey, B J McNeil.   

Abstract

In dental diagnosis, there are typically two or more clinical diagnostic procedures which may be used either independently or jointly to reach a conclusion regarding the presence of a particular disease in a patient. To determine which of these diagnostic procedures are more accurate, statistical methods may be applied to research data in which the true health status as well as the diagnosis provided by each clinical procedure are available on each observation. Results arising from this type of analysis can be of great interest to clinicians when the diagnostic procedures themselves are costly, painful, or even potentially harmful to the patient. Considered here is the special situation encountered in dental research in which each patient can have multiple concurrent cases of a certain disease such as caries, for then the statistical evaluation of diagnostic procedures is even further complicated. This report describes several statistical approaches for comparing the efficacy of diagnostic tests and illustrates their application on data from a study of diagnostic radiographs for dental caries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2201479     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1990.tb00051.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol        ISSN: 0301-5661            Impact factor:   3.383


  5 in total

1.  Detection accuracy of proximal caries by phosphor plate and cone-beam computerized tomography images scanned with different resolutions.

Authors:  Jun-Ge Cheng; Zhi-Ling Zhang; Xiao-Yan Wang; Zu-Yan Zhang; Xu-Chen Ma; Gang Li
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-07-30       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Diagnostic thinking and information used in clinical decision-making: a qualitative study of expert and student dental clinicians.

Authors:  Gerardo Maupomé; Stuart Schrader; Saurabh Mannan; Lawrence Garetto; Hafsteinn Eggertsson
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 2.757

3.  Accuracy of Digital Bitewing Radiography versus Different Views of Digital Panoramic Radiography for Detection of Proximal Caries.

Authors:  Mehrdad Abdinian; Sayed Mohammad Razavi; Reyhaneh Faghihian; Amir Abbas Samety; Elham Faghihian
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2015-04

4.  Reliability of overbite depth indicator (ODI) and anteroposterior dysplasia indicator (APDI) in the assessment of different vertical and sagittal dental malocclusions: a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.

Authors:  Farheen Fatima; Mubassar Fida; Attiya Shaikh
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct

5.  Effect of Filtration and Thickness of Cross-Sections of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Images on Detection of Proximal Caries.

Authors:  Mehrdad Abdinian; Rahman Nazeri; Marzieh Ghaiour
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2017-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.