Literature DB >> 26719047

The Effect of Publicized Quality Information on Home Health Agency Choice.

Jeah Kyoungrae Jung1, Bingxiao Wu2, Hyunjee Kim3, Daniel Polsky4.   

Abstract

We examine consumers' use of publicized quality information in Medicare home health care markets, where consumer cost sharing and travel costs are absent. We report two findings. First, agencies with high quality scores are more likely to be preferred by consumers after the introduction of a public reporting program than before. Second, consumers' use of publicized quality information differs by patient group. Community-based patients have slightly larger responses to public reporting than hospital-discharged patients. Patients with functional limitations at the start of their care, at least among hospital-discharged patients, have a larger response to the reported functional outcome measure than those without functional limitations. In all cases of significant marginal effects, magnitudes are small. We conclude that the current public reporting approach is unlikely to have critical impacts on home health agency choice. Identifying and releasing quality information that is meaningful to consumers may help increase consumers' use of public reports.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Medicare home health care; consumer choice; public reporting; quality information

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26719047      PMCID: PMC5144737          DOI: 10.1177/1077558715623718

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care Res Rev        ISSN: 1077-5587            Impact factor:   3.929


  17 in total

1.  Quality information and consumer health plan choices.

Authors:  Nancy Dean Beaulieu
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Do consumers respond to publicly reported quality information? Evidence from nursing homes.

Authors:  Rachel M Werner; Edward C Norton; R Tamara Konetzka; Daniel Polsky
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Information and consumer choice: the value of publicized health plan ratings.

Authors:  Ginger Zhe Jin; Alan T Sorensen
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  Start spreading the news: a structural estimate of the effects of New York hospital report cards.

Authors:  David Dranove; Andrew Sfekas
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 3.883

5.  Are healthcare quality "report cards" reaching consumers? Awareness in the chronically ill population.

Authors:  Dennis P Scanlon; Yunfeng Shi; Neerai Bhandari; Jon B Christianson
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  Shipping out instead of shaping up: rehospitalization from nursing homes as an unintended effect of public reporting.

Authors:  R Tamara Konetzka; Daniel Polsky; Rachel M Werner
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  Public reporting and market area exit decisions by home health agencies.

Authors:  Kyoungrae Jung; Roger Feldman
Journal:  Medicare Medicaid Res Rev       Date:  2012-07-30

8.  Does information matter? Competition, quality, and the impact of nursing home report cards.

Authors:  David C Grabowski; Robert J Town
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  The effect of publicly reporting hospital performance on market share and risk-adjusted mortality at high-mortality hospitals.

Authors:  David W Baker; Doug Einstadter; Charles Thomas; Scott Husak; Nahida H Gordon; Randall D Cebul
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Do markets respond to quality information? The case of fertility clinics.

Authors:  M Kate Bundorf; Natalie Chun; Gopi Shah Goda; Daniel P Kessler
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 3.883

View more
  4 in total

1.  Consumer selection and home health agency quality and patient experience stars.

Authors:  Margot L Schwartz; Momotazur Rahman; Kali S Thomas; R Tamara Konetzka; Vincent Mor
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Entry regulation and the effect of public reporting: Evidence from Home Health Compare.

Authors:  Bingxiao Wu; Jeah Jung; Hyunjee Kim; Daniel Polsky
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Evidence for Action: Addressing Systemic Racism Across Long-Term Services and Supports.

Authors:  Tetyana Pylypiv Shippee; Chanee D Fabius; Shekinah Fashaw-Walters; John R Bowblis; Manka Nkimbeng; Taylor I Bucy; Yinfei Duan; Weiwen Ng; Odichinma Akosionu; Jasmine L Travers
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 4.669

4.  Accounting for past patient composition in evaluations of quality reporting.

Authors:  Katherine I Tierney; Samuel Fishman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.734

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.