Literature DB >> 11147237

The impact of quality report cards on choice of physicians, hospitals, and HMOs: a midcourse evaluation.

D B Mukamel1, A I Mushlin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increasing competition in health care markets and ongoing pressures to contain costs raise concerns about possible deterioration in the quality of medical care. Publicly disseminated quality report cards are designed to inform consumers' choice of providers and health plans, thus counteracting incentives to provide low-quality care and improving the functioning of health care markets.
METHODS: This article reviews and evaluates the published evidence on the impact of quality report cards on patients' choice of health care providers and health plans.
RESULTS: Studies found only minimal effect of quality report cards on patient referral choices. These findings can be explained by several study design issues and by the economic forces governing health care markets. They cannot be construed to imply that quality report cards are not effective. DISCUSSION: Whether report cards are effective or not is still an unanswered question. Further efforts to improve the information contained in report cards and to make them more understandable could increase their effectiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11147237     DOI: 10.1016/s1070-3241(01)27003-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Improv        ISSN: 1070-3241


  15 in total

1.  Physician performance information and consumer choice: a survey of subjects with the freedom to choose between doctors.

Authors:  S-H Cheng; H-Y Song
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-04

Review 2.  Improving the quality of long-term care with better information.

Authors:  Vincent Mor
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Is there any ideal of 'high quality care' opposing 'low quality care'? A deconstructionist reading.

Authors:  Stephen Buetow; Peter Adams
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2006-06

Review 4.  Development of quality indicators for colorectal cancer surgery, using a 3-step modified Delphi approach.

Authors:  Anna R Gagliardi; Marko Simunovic; Bernard Langer; Hartley Stern; Adalsteinn D Brown
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Do report cards influence hospital choice? The case of kidney transplantation.

Authors:  David H Howard; Bruce Kaplan
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.730

6.  Is there evidence of cream skimming among nursing homes following the publication of the Nursing Home Compare report card?

Authors:  Dana B Mukamel; Heather Ladd; David L Weimer; William D Spector; Jacqueline S Zinn
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  2009-06-02

7.  Translating disparities research to policy: a qualitative study of state mental health policymakers' perceptions of mental health care disparities report cards.

Authors:  Anne Valentine; Darcie DeAngelo; Margarita Alegría; Benjamin L Cook
Journal:  Psychol Serv       Date:  2014-11

8.  Does information matter? Competition, quality, and the impact of nursing home report cards.

Authors:  David C Grabowski; Robert J Town
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Publication of quality report cards and trends in reported quality measures in nursing homes.

Authors:  Dana B Mukamel; David L Weimer; William D Spector; Heather Ladd; Jacqueline S Zinn
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 10.  Determinants of patient choice of healthcare providers: a scoping review.

Authors:  Aafke Victoor; Diana M J Delnoij; Roland D Friele; Jany J D J M Rademakers
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 2.908

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.