BACKGROUND: Despite increased focus on health care-associated infections (HAI), between 1.6 and 3.8 million HAI occur annually among the vulnerable population residing in US nursing homes (NH). This study characterized state department of health (DOH) activities and policies intended to improve quality and reduce HAI in NH. METHODS: We created a 17-item standardized data collection tool informed by 20 state DOH Web sites, reviewed by experts in the field and piloted by 2 independent reviewers (Cohen's κ .45-.73). The tool and corresponding protocol were used to systematically evaluate state DOH Web sites and related links. RESULTS: Three categories of data were abstracted: (1) consumer-directed information intended to increase accountability of and competition between NH, including mandatory HAI reporting and NH inspection reports; (2) surveyor training for federally-mandated NH inspections; and (3) guidance for NH providers to prevent HAI and monitor incidence. Only 5 states included HAI reporting in NH with differing HAI types and reporting requirements. CONCLUSION: State DOH information and activities focused on NH quality and reducing HAI were inconsistent. Systematically characterizing state DOH efforts to reduce HAI in NH is important to interpret the effects of these activities.
BACKGROUND: Despite increased focus on health care-associated infections (HAI), between 1.6 and 3.8 million HAI occur annually among the vulnerable population residing in US nursing homes (NH). This study characterized state department of health (DOH) activities and policies intended to improve quality and reduce HAI in NH. METHODS: We created a 17-item standardized data collection tool informed by 20 state DOH Web sites, reviewed by experts in the field and piloted by 2 independent reviewers (Cohen's κ .45-.73). The tool and corresponding protocol were used to systematically evaluate state DOH Web sites and related links. RESULTS: Three categories of data were abstracted: (1) consumer-directed information intended to increase accountability of and competition between NH, including mandatory HAI reporting and NH inspection reports; (2) surveyor training for federally-mandated NH inspections; and (3) guidance for NH providers to prevent HAI and monitor incidence. Only 5 states included HAI reporting in NH with differing HAI types and reporting requirements. CONCLUSION: State DOH information and activities focused on NH quality and reducing HAI were inconsistent. Systematically characterizing state DOH efforts to reduce HAI in NH is important to interpret the effects of these activities.
Authors: Craig A Umscheid; Matthew D Mitchell; Jalpa A Doshi; Rajender Agarwal; Kendal Williams; Patrick J Brennan Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Nicholas G Castle; Laura M Wagner; Jamie C Ferguson-Rome; Aiju Men; Steven M Handler Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Katherine L Kahn; Peter Mendel; Daniel A Weinberg; Kristin J Leuschner; Elizabeth M Gall; Sari Siegel Journal: Med Care Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Catherine C Cohen; John Engberg; Carolyn T A Herzig; Andrew W Dick; Patricia W Stone Journal: Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol Date: 2015-09-09 Impact factor: 3.254
Authors: Catherine Crawford Cohen; Monika Pogorzelska-Maziarz; Carolyn T A Herzig; Eileen J Carter; Ragnhildur Bjarnadottir; Patricia Semeraro; Jasmine L Travers; Patricia W Stone Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2015-05-22 Impact factor: 7.035