Literature DB >> 16107284

Information and consumer choice: the value of publicized health plan ratings.

Ginger Zhe Jin1, Alan T Sorensen.   

Abstract

We use data on the enrollment decisions of federal annuitants to estimate the influence of publicized ratings on health plan choice. We focus on the impact of ratings disseminated by the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA), and use our estimates to calculate the value of the information. Our approach exploits a novel feature of the data-the availability of non-public plan ratings-to correct for a source of bias that is inherent in studies of consumer responsiveness to information on product quality: since publicized ratings are correlated with other quality signals known to consumers (but unobserved by researchers), the estimated influence of ratings is likely to be overstated. We control for this bias by comparing the estimated impact of publicized ratings to the estimated impact of ratings that were never disclosed. The results indicate that NCQA's plan ratings had a meaningful influence on individuals' choices, particularly for individuals choosing a plan for the first time. Although we estimate that a very small fraction of individual decisions were materially affected by the information, for those that were affected the implied utility gains are substantial.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16107284     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Econ        ISSN: 0167-6296            Impact factor:   3.883


  18 in total

1.  Who values information from a health plan Internet-based decision tool and why: a demographic and utilization analysis.

Authors:  Song Chen; Pinar Karaca-Mandic; Regina Levin
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Using global ratings of health plans to improve the quality of health care.

Authors:  Jacob Glazer; Thomas G McGuire; Zhun Cao; Alan Zaslavsky
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  Consumers' interpretation and use of comparative information on the quality of health care: the effect of presentation approaches.

Authors:  Olga C Damman; Michelle Hendriks; Jany Rademakers; Peter Spreeuwenberg; Diana M J Delnoij; Peter P Groenewegen
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  A framework for guiding efforts to reward value instead of volume.

Authors:  Taylor J Christensen
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2015-11-07

5.  Is Anyone Paying Attention to Physician Report Cards? The Impact of Increased Availability on Consumers' Awareness and Use of Physician Quality Information.

Authors:  Yunfeng Shi; Dennis P Scanlon; Neeraj Bhandari; Jon B Christianson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Patient Navigators and Parent Use of Quality Data: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Sarah L Goff; Kathleen M Mazor; Penelope S Pekow; Katharine O White; Aruna Priya; Tara Lagu; Haley Guhn-Knight; Lorna Murphy; Yara Youssef Budway; Peter K Lindenauer
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  The Effect of Publicized Quality Information on Home Health Agency Choice.

Authors:  Jeah Kyoungrae Jung; Bingxiao Wu; Hyunjee Kim; Daniel Polsky
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 3.929

8.  Does information matter? Competition, quality, and the impact of nursing home report cards.

Authors:  David C Grabowski; Robert J Town
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-07-25       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Steering patients to safer hospitals? The effect of a tiered hospital network on hospital admissions.

Authors:  Dennis P Scanlon; Richard C Lindrooth; Jon B Christianson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-08-29       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  How do healthcare consumers process and evaluate comparative healthcare information? A qualitative study using cognitive interviews.

Authors:  Olga C Damman; Michelle Hendriks; Jany Rademakers; Diana M J Delnoij; Peter P Groenewegen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.