Literature DB >> 21789084

Current approach to the treatment of penile implant infections.

John J Mulcahy.   

Abstract

Modern penile implants, introduced to the market almost four decades ago, have provided a predictable and reliable treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) despite the development of less-invasive therapies. Infection associated with the placement of these devices does occur, and with prophylactic measures and protocols the incidence has decreased fortunately. In the presence of an infection the implant and all foreign material should be removed. A salvage procedure, during which the wound is thoroughly washed with antiseptic solutions after device removal and placement of a new implant during the same procedure, has a high success rate and is becoming a popular approach. The alternative, device removal with return at a later date for placing a new implant, entails a more difficult corporal dilation, and the resulting erection is noticeably shorter. Patient and partner satisfaction with a penile implant is the highest among all of the treatments for ED.

Entities:  

Keywords:  infected prostheses; penile implants; salvage procedures

Year:  2010        PMID: 21789084      PMCID: PMC3126071          DOI: 10.1177/1756287210370330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Adv Urol        ISSN: 1756-2872


  29 in total

1.  Surgical management of penile prosthesis complications.

Authors:  J J Mulcahy
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.896

2.  Revision washout decreases implant capsule tissue culture positivity: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Gerard D Henry; Culley C Carson; Steven K Wilson; Jeremy Wiygul; Chris Tornehl; Mario A Cleves; Caroline J Simmons; Craig F Donatucci
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-11-14       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Quantifying risk of penile prosthesis infection with elevated glycosylated hemoglobin.

Authors:  S K Wilson; C C Carson; M A Cleves; J R Delk
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Intracorporeal drainage after removal of infected penile prostheses.

Authors:  T J Maatman; D K Montague
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  In situ replacement of vascular prostheses infected by bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  D F Bandyk; T M Bergamini; E V Kinney; G R Seabrook; J B Towne
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Penile prosthesis cultures during revision surgery: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Gerard D Henry; Steven K Wilson; John R Delk; Culley C Carson; Ari Silverstein; Mario A Cleves; Craig F Donatucci
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Penile prosthetic infection: management by delayed and immediate salvage techniques.

Authors:  L D Knoll
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Penile prosthesis surgery in the treatment of impotence in the immunosuppressed man.

Authors:  A A Sidi; W Peng; C Sanseau; P H Lange
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Risk factors for penile prosthetic infection.

Authors:  J P Jarow
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Penile prosthetic surgery in neurologically impaired patients: long-term followup.

Authors:  Dirk-Henrik Zermann; Johannes Kutzenberger; Dieter Sauerwein; Jörg Schubert; Uwe Loeffler
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  14 in total

1.  Conservative Therapy is an Effective Option in Patients With Localized Infection After Penile Implant Surgery.

Authors:  Mohamad Habous; Mohammed Farag; Ben Williamson; Osama Laban; Saad Mahmoud; Osama Abdelwahab; Mohamed Elkhouly; Usama Kamil; Saleh Binsaleh; Raanan Tal; David Ralph; John P Mulhall
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.802

2.  Trends in penile prosthesis implantation and analysis of predictive factors for removal.

Authors:  Kai Li; Eileen R Brandes; Steven L Chang; Jeffrey J Leow; Benjamin I Chung; Ye Wang; Jairam R Eswara
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Clinical Outcome: Patient and Partner Satisfaction after Penile Implant Surgery.

Authors:  Cedric Jorissen; Helene De Bruyna; Evert Baten; Koenraad Van Renterghem
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2019-10-01

4.  Early history of inflatable penile prosthesis surgery: a view from someone who was there.

Authors:  David F Mobley
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  Patient and partner outcome of inflatable and semi-rigid penile prosthesis in a single institution.

Authors:  Ibrahim Halil Bozkurt; Burak Arslan; Tarik Yonguc; Zafer Kozacıoglu; Tansu Degirmenci; Bulent Gunlusoy; Suleyman Minareci
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

Review 6.  Penile prosthesis implant: scientific advances and technological innovations over the last four decades.

Authors:  Eric Chung
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-02

Review 7.  Recent advancements in penile prosthetics.

Authors:  Mathew Q Fakhoury; Joshua Halpern; Nelson Bennett
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-02-18

Review 8.  Narrative review of penile prosthetic implant technology and surgical results, including transgender patients.

Authors:  Michael Polchert; Brian Dick; Omer Raheem
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-06

9.  A novel approach for removal of an inflatable penile prosthesis reservoir using laparoscopic instruments.

Authors:  Angie L Staller; Courtney M Chang; Gavin N Wagenheim; Run Wang
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

10.  Inflatable Penile Prostheses Implantation: Does Antibiotic Exposure Matter?

Authors:  Ryan M Chanyi; Raidh Alzubaidi; Everett J Y Leung; Hannah B Wilcox; Gerald B Brock; Jeremy P Burton
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 2.491

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.