Literature DB >> 9554349

Quantifying risk of penile prosthesis infection with elevated glycosylated hemoglobin.

S K Wilson1, C C Carson, M A Cleves, J R Delk.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Elevation of glycosylated hemoglobin above levels of 11.5 mg.% has been considered a contraindication to penile prosthesis implantation in diabetic patients. We determine the predictive value of glycosylated hemoglobin A1C in penile prosthesis infections in diabetic and nondiabetic patients to confirm or deny this prevalent opinion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a 2-year prospective study of 389 patients, including 114 diabetics, who underwent 3-piece penile prosthesis implantation. All patients had similar preoperative preparation without regard to diabetic status, control or glycosylated hemoglobin A1C level. Risk of infection was statistically analyzed for diabetics versus nondiabetics, glycosylated hemoglobin A1C values above and below 11.5 mg.%, insulin dependent versus oral medication diabetics, and fasting blood sugars above and below 180 mg.%.
RESULTS: Prosthesis infections developed in 10 diabetics (8.7%) and 11 nondiabetics (4.0%). No increased infection rate was observed in diabetics with high fasting sugars or diabetics on insulin. There was no statistically significant increased infection risk with increased levels of glycosylated hemoglobin A1C among all patients or among only the diabetics. In fact, there was no meaningful difference in the median or mean level of glycosylated hemoglobin A1C in the infected and noninfected patients regardless of diabetes.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of glycosylated hemoglobin A1C values to identify and exclude surgical candidates with increased risk of infections is not proved by this study. Elevation of fasting sugar or insulin dependence also does not increase risk of infection in diabetics undergoing prosthesis implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9554349     DOI: 10.1097/00005392-199805000-00034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  34 in total

Review 1.  Radiological assessment of penile prosthesis: the role of magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ignacio Moncada; José Jara; Ramiro Cabello; Juan Ignacio Monzo; Carlos Hernández
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2004-10-30       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Penile implant infections: prevention and treatment.

Authors:  John J Mulcahy
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Current approach to the treatment of penile implant infections.

Authors:  John J Mulcahy
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2010-04

Review 4.  Minimizing Penile Implant Infection: A Literature Review of Patient and Surgical Factors.

Authors:  Bradley Holland; Tobias Kohler
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Conservative Therapy is an Effective Option in Patients With Localized Infection After Penile Implant Surgery.

Authors:  Mohamad Habous; Mohammed Farag; Ben Williamson; Osama Laban; Saad Mahmoud; Osama Abdelwahab; Mohamed Elkhouly; Usama Kamil; Saleh Binsaleh; Raanan Tal; David Ralph; John P Mulhall
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Penile prosthesis infection: progress in prevention and treatment.

Authors:  John J Mulcahy
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 7.  Infection Prevention Considerations for Complex Penile Prosthesis Recipients.

Authors:  Robert J Carrasquillo; Ricardo M Munarriz; Martin S Gross
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Risk factors for penile prosthetic infection.

Authors:  M Cakan; F Demirel; O Karabacak; F Yalçinkaya; U Altuğ
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 9.  Surgical management of erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Aaron J Milbank; Drogo K Montague
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.633

10.  Risk factors associated with penile prosthesis infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alejandro Carvajal; Johana Benavides; Herney Andrés García-Perdomo; Gerard D Henry
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 2.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.