Literature DB >> 15201759

Penile prosthesis cultures during revision surgery: a multicenter study.

Gerard D Henry1, Steven K Wilson, John R Delk, Culley C Carson, Ari Silverstein, Mario A Cleves, Craig F Donatucci.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Initial implantation of inflatable penile prosthesis has a 3% risk of infection. Reoperation of penile implants has a higher rate of infection, estimated between 10% and 18%. To explain the higher risk in revision surgery in this prospective study we cultured clinically uninfected prostheses requiring revision. Prosthesis pain was also investigated as a predictor of positive culture.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: At 3 institutions cultures were prospectively obtained from 77 clinically uninfected penile prostheses at revision surgery. Immediately upon surgical exposure of the pump cultures were obtained. If a bacterial biofilm was noted on any component it was additionally cultured. All culture isolates positive for a staphylococcus species were tested for sensitivity to rifampin and tetracycline (minocycline). An implant is now available that is coated with these antibiotics. Patient history of chronic prosthesis pain was ascertained.
RESULTS: Culture positive bacteria were found in 54 of 77 (70%) patients with clinically uninfected penile prostheses. In some patients more than 1 organism grew and, occasionally, the pump culture was negative but the biofilm was positive. Of 54 patients 49 had positive (90%) culture for staphylococcus genus with 10 different species. All staphylococcal species were sensitive to rifampin and/or tetracycline. We did not find a significant association between prosthesis related pain and culture laboratory results.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of clinically uninfected penile prostheses have organisms growing in the implant spaces at reoperation. Most of these organisms are staphylococcal species that are sensitive to rifampin/minocycline.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15201759     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000132141.48587.f1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  26 in total

Review 1.  A practical overview of considerations for penile prosthesis placement.

Authors:  Landon Trost; Philip Wanzek; George Bailey
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Penile implant infections: prevention and treatment.

Authors:  John J Mulcahy
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Current approach to the treatment of penile implant infections.

Authors:  John J Mulcahy
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2010-04

Review 4.  Minimizing Penile Implant Infection: A Literature Review of Patient and Surgical Factors.

Authors:  Bradley Holland; Tobias Kohler
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  A technique for improved skin isolation and a more visible operative field during penile prosthesis surgery.

Authors:  N A Faure Walker; D Eldred-Evans; S Willis; P K Hegarty
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 6.  Significance of biofilm for the prosthetic surgeon.

Authors:  R Charles Welliver; Brittney L Hanerhoff; Gerard D Henry; Tobias S Köhler
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Conservative Therapy is an Effective Option in Patients With Localized Infection After Penile Implant Surgery.

Authors:  Mohamad Habous; Mohammed Farag; Ben Williamson; Osama Laban; Saad Mahmoud; Osama Abdelwahab; Mohamed Elkhouly; Usama Kamil; Saleh Binsaleh; Raanan Tal; David Ralph; John P Mulhall
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 3.802

8.  Penile prosthesis implantation for the treatment for male erectile dysfunction: clinical outcomes and lessons learnt after 955 procedures.

Authors:  E Chung; C T Van; I Wilson; R A Cartmill
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  Infection Prevention Considerations for Complex Penile Prosthesis Recipients.

Authors:  Robert J Carrasquillo; Ricardo M Munarriz; Martin S Gross
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  Prospective analysis of cultures from the Furlow insertion tool: a possible etiology for penile prosthesis infections.

Authors:  Faysal A Yafi; James Furr; Farouk M El-Khatib; Koenraad van Renterghem; Luca Venturino; Robert Andrianne; Daniar Osmonov; David Ralph; Javier Romero Otero; Maxime Sempels; Georgios Hatzichristodoulou; Aaron Lentz; Steven K Wilson
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 2.896

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.