Literature DB >> 2027196

In situ replacement of vascular prostheses infected by bacterial biofilms.

D F Bandyk1, T M Bergamini, E V Kinney, G R Seabrook, J B Towne.   

Abstract

Late prosthetic graft infections are commonly the result of coagulase-negative staphylococci that survive within a biofilm on prosthetic surfaces and provoke perigraft inflammation. The indolent nature and microbiologic characteristics of bacterial biofilm infections coupled with the morbidity of graft excision and extraanatomic bypass grafting prompted us to use in situ graft replacement in 15 patients admitted to the hospital with 17 infected graft segments at a mean (+/- SEM) time interval of 70 +/- 16 months after graft implantation (n = 6) or revision (n = 9). Since 1986, 17 grafts (14 aortofemoral, 2 axillofemoral, and 1 femoropopliteal) infected by bacterial biofilms have been treated. Signs on admission included femoral pseudoaneurysm (n = 7), perigraft abscess (n = 6), or graft-cutaneous sinus tract (n = 4). No patient exhibited septicemia. At operation graft incorporation was absent and Gram's stain of perigraft exudate showed polymorphonuclear leukocytes but no bacteria. Culture of explanted graft material isolated coagulase-negative staphylococci (n = 12), Staphylococcus aureus (n = 1), and no growth (n = 2). All patients were successfully treated by a regimen that included parenteral antibiotics, removal of involved graft material, excision of inflamed perigraft tissue, and in situ replacement with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene prosthesis. No deaths, graft thromboses, or deep wound infections occurred after operation. Recurrent graft infection did not develop during a follow-up interval that ranged from 5 to 50 months (mean, 21 months). Diagnosis of vascular prosthesis infection caused by bacterial biofilms can be based on signs at admission and operative findings. Complications of this perigraft infection can be eradicated by antibiotic administration, local debridement, and in situ graft replacement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2027196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  8 in total

1.  Penile implant infections: prevention and treatment.

Authors:  John J Mulcahy
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Current approach to the treatment of penile implant infections.

Authors:  John J Mulcahy
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2010-04

3.  Neutrophil adhesion to vascular prosthetic surfaces triggers nonapoptotic cell death.

Authors:  G S Nadzam; C De La Cruz; R S Greco; B Haimovich
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Biofilms in device-related infections.

Authors:  N Khardori; M Yassien
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol       Date:  1995-09

5.  Small intestinal submucosa for vascular reconstruction in the presence of gastrointestinal contamination.

Authors:  T Wright Jernigan; Martin A Croce; Catherine Cagiannos; Daniel H Shell; Charles R Handorf; Timothy C Fabian
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Selective preservation of infected prosthetic arterial grafts. Analysis of a 20-year experience with 120 extracavitary-infected grafts.

Authors:  K D Calligaro; F J Veith; M L Schwartz; J Goldsmith; R P Savarese; M J Dougherty; D A DeLaurentis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 7.  Update on clinical significance of coagulase-negative staphylococci.

Authors:  W E Kloos; T L Bannerman
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  First evidence of sternal wound biofilm following cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Haytham Elgharably; Ethan Mann; Hamdy Awad; Kasturi Ganesh; Piya Das Ghatak; Gayle Gordillo; Chittoor B Sai-Sudhakar; Sashwati Roy; Daniel J Wozniak; Chandan K Sen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.