Literature DB >> 9697796

Penile prosthetic infection: management by delayed and immediate salvage techniques.

L D Knoll1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A retrospective review was performed to determine success rates using explantation plus delayed (3 days) versus immediate reimplantation in managing an infected penile prosthesis.
METHODS: During a 9-year period, 41 patients who presented with an infected penile prosthesis underwent a salvage procedure. Group A (n = 31) underwent a delayed salvage procedure and group B (n = 10) underwent an immediate salvage procedure.
RESULTS: Successful salvage occurred in 71% in group A (delayed) and 80% in group B (immediate). Follow-up ranged from 30 to 108 months in group A and 5 to 16 months in group B. Analysis showed no statistically significant difference between the two treatment groups (P = 0.58). Failed salvage procedures were managed with device explantation and later reimplantation at 4 to 6 months.
CONCLUSIONS: In proper patient selection, immediate salvage appears as successful as delayed salvage procedures. Significant savings of healthcare dollars can be realized by an immediate salvage procedure if success rates prevail with longer term follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9697796     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(98)00187-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  11 in total

Review 1.  A practical overview of considerations for penile prosthesis placement.

Authors:  Landon Trost; Philip Wanzek; George Bailey
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Penile implant infections: prevention and treatment.

Authors:  John J Mulcahy
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Current approach to the treatment of penile implant infections.

Authors:  John J Mulcahy
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2010-04

4.  Penile prosthesis infection: progress in prevention and treatment.

Authors:  John J Mulcahy
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Salvage penile prosthetic surgery utilizing temporary malleable implants.

Authors:  Michael Lao; R James Graydon; Jared M Bieniek
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-11

Review 6.  Penile prosthesis implant in the special populations: diabetics, neurogenic conditions, fibrotic cases, concurrent urinary continence surgery, and salvage implants.

Authors:  Eric Chung
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 7.  Tips and tricks in the management of inflatable penile prosthesis infection: A review.

Authors:  Scott C Brimley; Ayad Yousif; Joseph Kim; Wayne J G Hellstrom
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2021-07-05

Review 8.  Penile implant infection prevention part II: device coatings have changed the game.

Authors:  John J Mulcahy; Tobias S Köhler; Lexiaochuan Wen; Steven K Wilson
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 9.  Current status of penile prosthesis implantation.

Authors:  D K Montague; K W Angermeier
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.862

10.  Penile prosthesis: what should we do about complications?

Authors:  C Bettocchi; P Ditonno; F Palumbo; G Lucarelli; G Garaffa; B Giammusso; M Battaglia
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2008-11-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.